<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>The paper offers a qualified endorsement of Terry Eagleton’s striking claim that “a work’s moral outlook … may be secreted as much in its form as its content”. A number of points are raised in defence of the claim: an argument for the inseparability, under certain conditions, of form and content in a literary work; an idea of moral content, not as derived moral principle, but as inward-facing interpretation grounded in an ethical vocabulary; the possibility of internal and external perspectives on fictional characters; and an emphasis on emotions expressed in, rather than caused by, narrative. Three literary examples are explored, to show how vocabulary, syntax, implicature, and tone, contribute to the emergence of moral salience. A consequence drawn is that the ethical stance readers take to a scene or incident is partially shaped by the narrative modes of its presentation. The overall perspective of the paper is that of aesthetic autonomism: the view that the aesthetic value of a work of literature is distinct from, and not reducible to, any instrumental moral values (positive or negative) attributed to the work.</p>
</abstract>

The paper offers a qualified endorsement of Terry Eagleton’s striking claim that “a work’s moral outlook … may be secreted as much in its form as its content”. A number of points are raised in defence of the claim: an argument for the inseparability, under certain conditions, of form and content in a literary work; an idea of moral content, not as derived moral principle, but as inward-facing interpretation grounded in an ethical vocabulary; the possibility of internal and external perspectives on fictional characters; and an emphasis on emotions expressed in, rather than caused by, narrative. Three literary examples are explored, to show how vocabulary, syntax, implicature, and tone, contribute to the emergence of moral salience. A consequence drawn is that the ethical stance readers take to a scene or incident is partially shaped by the narrative modes of its presentation. The overall perspective of the paper is that of aesthetic autonomism: the view that the aesthetic value of a work of literature is distinct from, and not reducible to, any instrumental moral values (positive or negative) attributed to the work.

Literary Form and Ethical Content

Disputatio

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

{"article-title":"Literary Form and Ethical Content"}

The paper offers a qualified endorsement of Terry Eagleton’s striking claim that “a work’s moral outlook … may be secreted as much in its form as its content”....

Literary Form and Ethical Content

Online veröffentlicht: 28. Nov. 2022

Seitenbereich: 245 - 263

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2021-0013

Schlüsselwörter
expressed vs felt emotion, form and content in literature, moral content and literary interpretation, opaque/transparent modes of reading, Terry Eagleton

© 2021 Peter Lamarque, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Literary Form and Ethical Content

Online veröffentlicht: 28. Nov. 2022

Seitenbereich: 245 - 263

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2021-0013

Schlüsselwörterexpressed vs felt emotion, form and content in literature, moral content and literary interpretation, opaque/transparent modes of reading, Terry Eagleton

© 2021 Peter Lamarque, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Schlüsselwörter
expressed vs felt emotion, form and content in literature, moral content and literary interpretation, opaque/transparent modes of reading, Terry Eagleton