[
Brink, David 1989. Moral Realism and the Foundation of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511624612
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Foot, Philippa. 1978. “Morality as a system of hypothetical imperatives”. In Virtues and Vices Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ginsborg, Hannah. 2002. “Review of critique of the power of judgment by Immanuel Kant”. Translation by Paul Guyer, Eric Matthews. Paul Guyer (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000”. The Philosophical Review 111: 429–35.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kant, Immanuel. 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgement. Translation by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kant, Immanuel. 1928. Critique of Judgement. Translation by James Creed Meredith. Oxford: Clarendon.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zangwill, Nick. 1992. “UnKantian notions of disinterest”. British Journal of Aesthetics 32(2):149–52.10.1093/bjaesthetics/32.2.149
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zangwill, Nick. 1995: “Kant on pleasure in the agreeable”. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53(2): 167–76.10.1111/1540_6245.jaac53.2.0167
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zangwill, Nick. 2003. “Externalist moral motivation”. American Philosophical Quarterly 40(2):143–54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zangwill, Nick. 2008. “The indifference argument”. Philosophical Studies 138(1): 91–124.10.1007/s11098-006-9000-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zangwill, Nick. 2013. “Nietzsche on Kant on disinterestedness”. History of Philosophy Quarterly 30(1): 75–91.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zangwill, Nick. 2015. “Motivational externalism: formulation, methodology, rationality and indifference”. In Motivational Internalism. Gunnar Bjornson et al. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199367955.003.0003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zangwill, Nick. 2022. “Disinterestedness defended”. In Disinterested Pleasure and Beauty— Perspectives from Kantian and Contemporary Aesthetics. Larissa Berger (ed.). Berlin: De Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
