Descriptive Rules and Normativity

Alexander, L. and Sherwin, E. 1994. The deceptive nature of rules. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142(4): 1191–225.10.2307/3312452Search in Google Scholar

Alexander, L. and Sherwin, E. 2001. The Rule of Rules: Morality, Rules, and the Dilemmas of Law. Duke University Press.10.2307/j.ctv123x7fsSearch in Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. 1983. What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316499030Search in Google Scholar

Audi, R. 2008. Belief, faith, and acceptance. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 63(1/3): 87–102.10.1007/s11153-007-9137-6Search in Google Scholar

Baier, K. 1958. The Moral Point of View. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Black, M. 1962. Models and Metaphors. Cornell: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Broome, J. 2000. Normative requirements. In Normativity, ed. by Dancy, Jonathan. Blackwell, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, A. 2017. A theory of legitimate expectations. Journal of Political Philosophy 25(4): 435–60.10.1111/jopp.12135Search in Google Scholar

Bulygin, E. 1992. On norms of competence. Law and Philosophy 11: 201–16.10.1007/BF01000642Search in Google Scholar

Cartwright, N. 1983. How the laws of physics lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198247044.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Dancy, J. 2000. Practical Reality. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Darwall, S. 2003. Desires, reasons and causes. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67: 435–43.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00300.xSearch in Google Scholar

Davidson, D. 1980. Actions, reasons and causes. In Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dretske, F. 1977. Laws of nature. Philosophy of Science 44: 248–68.10.1086/288741Search in Google Scholar

Earman, J. 1978. The universality of laws. Philosophy of Science 45: 173–81.10.1086/288795Search in Google Scholar

Finnis, J. 1980. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Flathman, R. 1973. Concepts in Social and Political Philosophy. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Gilbert, M. 2006. A Theory of Political Obligation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0199274959.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Goldman, A. 1970. A Theory of Human Action. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Hare, R. 1952. The Language of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law (2nd Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. 1982. Essays on Bentham. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Korsgaard, C. 1996. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554476Search in Google Scholar

McClennen, E. 2004. The rationality of being guided by rules. In The Oxford Handbook of Rationality ed. by A. Mele and P. Rawling. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195145397.003.0012Search in Google Scholar

McClennen, E. and Shapiro, S. 1998. Rule-guided behavior. In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, ed. by Newman, Peter. New York: St Martin’s Press.Search in Google Scholar

Midgley, G. 1959. Linguistic rules. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society LIX: 271–90.10.1093/aristotelian/59.1.271Search in Google Scholar

Moore, G. E. 2004. Some Main Problems of Philosophy. Leicester: Blackfriars Press.Search in Google Scholar

Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Placani, A. 2017. Constitutive and regulative rules: a dispute and a resolution. Phenomenology and Mind 13: 56–62.Search in Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.10.1063/1.3060577Search in Google Scholar

Ramsey, F. 1978. Foundations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. 1955. Two concepts of rules. Philosophical Review 64: 3–32.10.2307/2182230Search in Google Scholar

Ross, A. 1968. Directives and Norms. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Scanlon, T. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schauer, F. 1991. Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. 1999. Mind, Language and Society. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Simmons, A. J. 1981. Reasonable expectations and obligations: a reply to Postow. Southern Journal of Philosophy 19(1): 123–7.10.1111/j.2041-6962.1981.tb01416.xSearch in Google Scholar

Smith, B. 2003. John Searle: from speech acts to social reality. In John Searle, ed. by B. Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613999Search in Google Scholar

Strawson, G. 1989. The Secret Connexion: Causation, Realism, and David Hume. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F. 1962. Freedom and resentment. Proceedings of the British Academy 48: 1–25. Reprinted in Fischer and Ravizza 1993, 45–66.Search in Google Scholar

Swoyer, C. 1982. The nature of natural laws. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60: 203–23.10.1080/00048408212340641Search in Google Scholar

Tooley, M. 1977. The nature of laws. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7: 667–98.10.1080/00455091.1977.10716190Search in Google Scholar

Ullman-Margalit, E. 1980. The Emergence of Norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Velleman, D. 2000. The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198238256.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Von Wright, G. H. 1963. Norm and Action. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, B. 1981. Internal and external reasons. Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar