Singular Reference in Fictional Discourse?

Alward, Peter. 2011. Description, disagreement, and fictional names. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41(3): 423–48.10.1353/cjp.2011.0028Search in Google Scholar

Asher, Nicholas. 2006. Things and their aspects. Philosophical Issues 16: 1–23.10.1111/j.1533-6077.2006.00100.xSearch in Google Scholar

Bertolet, Rod. 1984. On a fictional ellipsis. Erkenntnis 21: 189–94.10.1007/BF00166384Search in Google Scholar

Boër, S.E.; and Lycan, W. 1986. Knowing Who. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bonomi, Andrea. 2008. Fictional contexts. In Perspectives on Context, edited by P. Bouquet, L. Serafini and R. Thomason. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 213–48.Search in Google Scholar

Brock, S.; and Everett, A. 2015. Fictional Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735595.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Buchanan, Ray. 2014. Reference, understanding, and communication. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92(1): 55–70.10.1080/00048402.2013.788526Search in Google Scholar

Burge, Tyler. 2009. Five theses on de re states and attitudes. In The Philosophy of David Kaplan. Edited by J. Almog and P. Leonardi. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 246–324.Search in Google Scholar

Chalmers, David. 2011a. Propositions and attitude ascriptions: a Fregean account. Noûs 45(4): 595–639.10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00788.xSearch in Google Scholar

Chalmers, David. 2011b. Verbal disputes. Philosophical Review 120(4): 515–66.10.1215/00318108-1334478Search in Google Scholar

Currie, Gregory. 1990. The Nature of Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Devitt, Michael. 1981. Designation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7312/devi90836Search in Google Scholar

Dorsch, Fabian. 2016. Knowledge by imagination—how imaginative experience can ground factual knowledge. Teorema 35(3): 87–116.Search in Google Scholar

Everett, Anthony. 2013. The Nonexistent. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674794.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Everett, A.; and Schroeder, T. 2015. Ideas for stories. In Fictional Objects. Edited by S. Brock and A. Everett. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 275–93.Search in Google Scholar

Friend, Stacie. 2000. Real people in unreal contexts. In Empty Names, Fiction and the Puzzles of Non-existence. Edited by A. Everett and T. Hofweber, Stanford: CSLI, 183–203.Search in Google Scholar

Friend, Stacie. 2007. Fictional characters. Philosophy Compass 2(2): 141–56.10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00059.xSearch in Google Scholar

Friend, Stacie. 2011. The great beetle debate: a study in imagining with proper names. Philosophical Studies 153: 183–211.10.1007/s11098-009-9485-4Search in Google Scholar

Friend, Stacie. 2012. Fiction as a genre. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 92: 179–208.10.1111/j.1467-9264.2012.00331.xSearch in Google Scholar

Friend, Stacie. 2014. Notions of nothing. In Empty Representations: Reference and Non-Existence. Edited by M. García-Carpintero and G. Martí. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 307–32.Search in Google Scholar

Friend, Stacie. 2017. Elucidating the truth in criticism. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75: 387–99.10.1111/jaac.12397Search in Google Scholar

García-Carpintero, Manuel. 1998. Indexicals as token-reflexives. Mind 107: 529–63.10.1093/mind/107.427.529Search in Google Scholar

García-Carpintero, Manuel. 2000. A presuppositional account of reference-fixing. Journal of Philosophy 97(3): 109–47.10.2307/2678500Search in Google Scholar

García-Carpintero, Manuel. 2006a. Recanati on the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Crítica 38: 35–68.10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2006.466Search in Google Scholar

García-Carpintero, Manuel. 2006b. Two-dimensionalism: a neo-Fregean interpretation. In Two-Dimensional Semantics. Edited by M. García-Carpintero and J. Macià. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 181–204.Search in Google Scholar

García-Carpintero, Manuel. 2007. Fiction-making as an illocutionary act. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65: 203–16.10.1111/j.1540-594X.2007.00250.xSearch in Google Scholar

García-Carpintero, Manuel. 2010a. Fictional singular imaginings. In New Essays on Singular Thought. Edited by Robin Jeshion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 273–99.Search in Google Scholar

García-Carpintero, Manuel. 2010b. Fictional entities, theoretical models and figurative truth. In Beyond Mimesis and Convention—Representation in Art and Science. Edited by R. Frigg, and M. Hunter. Springer, 139-68.Search in Google Scholar

García-Carpintero, Manuel. 2013. Norms of fiction-making. British Journal of Aesthetics 53: 339–57, DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ayt021.10.1093/aesthj/ayt021Search in Google Scholar

García-Carpintero, Manuel. 2015. Is fictional reference rigid? Organon F 22: 145–68.Search in Google Scholar

García-Carpintero, Manuel. 2016. To tell what happened as invention: literature and philosophy on learning from fiction. In Literary Studies and the Philosophy of Literature: New Interdisciplinary Directions. Edited by Andrea Selleri and Philip Gaydon. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 123–47.Search in Google Scholar

García-Carpintero, Manuel. 2017. The Mill-Frege theory of proper names. Mind doi:10.1093/mind/fzx010.10.1093/mind/fzx010Search in Google Scholar

García-Carpintero, Manuel. 2018. Co-identification and fictional names. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Online First, DOI: 10.1111/phpr.12552.10.1111/phpr.12552Search in Google Scholar

García-Carpintero, Manuel. 2019a. State of the art: semantics of fictional terms. Teorema.Search in Google Scholar

García-Carpintero, Manuel. 2019b. Assertions in fictions: an indirect speech act account. Grazer Philosophische Studien.10.1163/18756735-09603013Search in Google Scholar

García-Carpintero, Manuel. 2019c. On the nature of fiction-making: Grice or Austin? British Journal of Aesthetics, doi: 10.1093/aesthj/ayy054.10.1093/aesthj/ayy054Search in Google Scholar

García-Carpintero, Manuel. 2019d. Normative fiction-making and the world of the fiction. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 77(3): 267–79, DOI: 10.1111/jaac.12660.10.1111/jaac.12660Search in Google Scholar

García-Carpintero, Manuel. 2020. Referential indeterminacy in fiction. Journal of Applied Logic 7(2): 177–90.Search in Google Scholar

Gendler, Tamar Szabó. 2000. The puzzle of imaginative resistance. Journal of Philosophy 97(2): 55–81.10.2307/2678446Search in Google Scholar

Gómez-Torrente, Mario. 2019. Roads to Reference. An Essay on Reference-ixing in Natural Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198846277.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Grzankowski, Alex. 2018. A relational theory of non-propositional attitudes. In Non-Propositional Intentionality. Edited by A. Grzankowski and M. Montague, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 134–51.Search in Google Scholar

Hoek, Daniel. 2018. Conversational exculpature. Philosophical Review 127(2): 151–96.10.1215/00318108-4326594Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, David. 1969. Quantifying in. In Words and Objections. Edited by D. Davidson and J. Hintikka. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 178–214.Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, David. 1989. Demonstratives. In Themes from Kaplan. Edited by J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 481–563.Search in Google Scholar

Kind, Amy. 2018. How imagination gives rise to knowledge. In Perceptual Memory and Perceptual Imagination. Edited by Fiona Macpherson and Fabian Dorsch. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 227–46.Search in Google Scholar

Kot’átko, Petr. 2010. Who is who in the fictional work. In Fictionality-Possibility-Reality. Edited by P. Koťátko, M. Pokorný and M. Sabatés. Aleph, Bratislava, 89-102.Search in Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul. 2011. Vacuous names and fictional entities. In his Philosophical Troubles. Oxford: Oxford UP, 52–74 (based on a talk given in 1973).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730155.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul. 2013. Reference and Existence. Oxford: Oxford University Press (based on the John Locke lectures originally delivered in 1973).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199928385.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kroon, Frederick. 1994. A problem about make-believe. Philosophical Studies 75: 201–29.10.1007/BF00989582Search in Google Scholar

Kroon, Frederick. 2004. Descriptivism, pretense, and the Frege-Russell problems. Philosophical Review 113: 1–30.Search in Google Scholar

Kroon, Frederick. 2005. Belief about nothing in particular. In Fictionalism in Metaphysics. Edited by M. Kalderon. Oxford: Oxford U.P., 178–203.Search in Google Scholar

Kroon, Fred; and Voltolini, Alberto. 2016. Fiction. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition). Edited by Edward N. Zalta. URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/fiction/.Search in Google Scholar

Lamarque, Peter. 2014. The Opacity of Literature, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lamarque, P.; and Olsen, S. H. 1994. Truth, Fiction and Literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Langland-Hassam, Peter. 2015. Imaginative attitudes. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90: 664–86.10.1111/phpr.12115Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1978. Truth in fiction. American Philosophical Quarterly 15: 37–46.Search in Google Scholar

Reprinted with postscripts in D. Lewis, Philosophical Papers, vol. 1, 261–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983, from which I quote.Search in Google Scholar

Loar, Brian. 1976. The semantics of singular terms. Philosophical Studies 30: 353–77.10.1007/BF00372537Search in Google Scholar

Ludlow, Peter. 2006. From Sherlock Holmes and Buffy to Klingon and Norrathian Platinum Pieces: pretence, contextualism, and the myth of fiction. Philosophical Issues 16: 162–83.Search in Google Scholar

Maier, Emar. 2010. Presupposing acquaintance: a unified semantics for de dicto, de re and de se belief reports. Linguistics and Philosophy 32(5): 429–74.10.1007/s10988-010-9065-2Search in Google Scholar

Maier, Emar. 2016. Attitudes and mental files in discourse representation theory. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7: 473–90.10.1007/s13164-015-0296-6Search in Google Scholar

Maier, Emar. 2017. Fictional names in psychologistic semantics. Theoretical Linguistics 43(1–2): 1–45.10.1515/tl-2017-0001Search in Google Scholar

Manning, Luke. 2014. Real representation of fictional objects. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72(1): 13–24.10.1111/jaac.12057Search in Google Scholar

Mole, Christopher. 2009. Fiction’s ontological commitments. The Philosophical Forum 40(4): 473–88.10.1111/j.1467-9191.2009.00340.xSearch in Google Scholar

Motoarca, Ioan-Radu. 2014. Fictional surrogates. Philosophia 42: 1033–53.10.1007/s11406-014-9522-1Search in Google Scholar

Motoarca, Ioan-Radu. 2018. Are fictional characters and literary works ontologically on a par? Paciic Philosophical Quarterly 99: 596–611. DOI: 10.1111/papq.12182.10.1111/papq.12182Search in Google Scholar

Orlando, Eleonora. 2017. Files for fiction. Acta Analytica 32: 55–71.10.1007/s12136-016-0298-8Search in Google Scholar

Parsons, Terence. 1980. Nonexistent Objects. New Haven: Yale U.P.Search in Google Scholar

Perry, John. 2009. Directing intentions. In The Philosophy of David Kaplan. Edited by J. Almog and P. Leonardi. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 187–201.Search in Google Scholar

Perry, John. 2012. Reference and Relexivity. 2nd Edition. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Pickel, Bryan. 2015. Variables and attitudes. Noûs 49(2): 333–56.10.1111/nous.12044Search in Google Scholar

Predelli, Stefano. 1997. Talk about fiction. Erkenntnis 46: 69–77.10.1023/A:1005341818171Search in Google Scholar

Predelli, Stefano. 2002. ‘Holmes’ and Holmes—a Millian analysis of names from fiction. Dialectica 56(3): 261–79.10.1111/j.1746-8361.2002.tb00242.xSearch in Google Scholar

Predelli, Stefano. 2017. Proper Names: A Millian Account. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198778158.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Predelli, Stefano. 2020. Fictional Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198854128.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Recanati, François. 2000. Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5163.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Recanati, François. 2018. Fictional, metafictional, parafictional. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 118: 25–54.Search in Google Scholar

Reimer, Marga. 2005. The ellipsis account of fiction-talk. In Ellipsis and Nonsentential Speech. Edited by R. Elugardo and R. Stainton. Dordrecht: Springer, 203–15.Search in Google Scholar

Riffaterre, Michael. 1990. Fictional Truth. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand. 1903. On meaning and denotation. In The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Volume 4: Foundations of Logic, 1903–05. Edited by Alasdair Urquhart. Routledge: London, 1994, 324–58.Search in Google Scholar

Sainsbury, Mark. 2018. Thinking about Things. Oxford: Oxford University Press,.10.1093/oso/9780198803348.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Salmon, Nathan. 1998. Nonexistence. Noûs 32: 277–319.10.1111/0029-4624.00101Search in Google Scholar

Salmon, Nathan. 2004. The good, the bad, and the ugly. In Descriptions and Beyond. Edited by M. Reimer and A. Bezuidenhout. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schiffer, Stephen. 2003. The Things We Mean. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0199257760.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Soames, Scott. 2002. Beyond Rigidity. New York: Oxford U.P.10.1093/0195145283.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert. 197. Assertion. In Syntax and Semantics 9. Edited by P. Cole. New York: Academic Press, 315–32.Search in Google Scholar

Stokke, Andreas. (Forthcoming.) Fictional names and individual concepts. Synthese.Search in Google Scholar

Szabó, Zoltan G. 2003. On qualification. Philosophical Perspectives 17: 385–414.10.1111/j.1520-8583.2003.00016.xSearch in Google Scholar

Thomasson, Amie L. 1999. Fiction and Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.10.1017/CBO9780511527463Search in Google Scholar

Thomasson, Amie L. 2003. Speaking of fictional characters. Dialectica 57: 205–23.10.1111/j.1746-8361.2003.tb00266.xSearch in Google Scholar

Thomasson, Amie L. 2010. Fiction, existence and indeterminacy. In Fictions and Models: New Essays. Edited by John Woods. Munich: Philosophia Verlag, 109–48.Search in Google Scholar

van Inwagen, Peter. 1977. Creatures of fiction. American Philosophical Quarterly 14: 299–308.Search in Google Scholar

Voltolini, Alberto. 2006a. How Ficta Follow Fiction. A Syncretistic Account of Fictional Entities. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-5147-6Search in Google Scholar

Voltolini, Alberto. 2006b. Fiction as a base of interpretation contexts. Synthese 153: 23–47.10.1007/s11229-006-0001-5Search in Google Scholar

Voltolini, Alberto. 2013. Probably the Charterhouse of Parma does not exist, possibly not even that Parma. Humana-Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies 25: 235–61.Search in Google Scholar

Voltolini, Alberto. 2016. The nature of fiction/al utterances. Humana-Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies 25: 28–55.10.1515/kjps-2016-0016Search in Google Scholar

Walters, Lee. 2017. Fictionality and imagination, revisited. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75(1): 15–21.10.1111/jaac.12341Search in Google Scholar

Walters, Lee. (ms.) Fictional names.Search in Google Scholar

Walton, Kendall. 1990. Mimesis and Make-Believe. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard U.P.Search in Google Scholar

Williamson, Timothy. 1996. Knowing and asserting. Philosophical Review 105: 489–523; included with some revisions as chapter 11 of his Knowledge and Its Limits, Oxford UP, New York, 2000, from which I quote.10.2307/2998423Search in Google Scholar

Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1980. Works and Worlds of Art. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Yablo, Stephen. 2001. Go figure: a path through fictionalism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 25. Edited by Peter A. French and Howard K. Wettstein. Oxford: Blackwell, 72–102.Search in Google Scholar

Yablo, Stephen. 2014a. Aboutness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Yablo, Stephen. 2014b. Carnap’s paradox and easy ontology. Journal of Philosophy 111(9/10) 470–501.10.5840/jphil20141119/1034Search in Google Scholar