[
Andersen, H., Casal, J., Dandrieux, A., Debray, B., De Dianous, V., Duijm, N. J., et al., 2004. ARAMIS - user guide. EC Contract number EVG1-CT-2001-00036.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bento, J.-P. 2003. Review from an MTO-perspective of five investigation reports from BP. Norway: Stavanger.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CCPS, 2001. Layer of protection analysis simplified process risk assessment. New York: Center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DoE, 1997. Implementation guide for use with DOE Order 225.1A, accident investigation, DOE G 225.1A-1, Rev. 1. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy (DOE).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dianous, V., Fiévez, C., 2006. ARAMIS project: A more explicit demonstration of risk control through the use of bow-tie diagrams and the evaluation of safety barrier performance, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 130, 220-233, doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.01010.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.01016107301
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Duijm, N. J., Andersen, H. B., Hale, A., Goossens, L., Hourtolou, D., 2004. Evaluating and managing safety barriers in major hazard plants, [In:] PSAM 7 - ESREL ’04, Berlin, Germany.10.1007/978-0-85729-410-4_18
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goossens, L., Hourtolou, D., 2003. What is a barrier? ARAMIS - working document.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hale, A., 2003. Note on barriers and delivery systems, [In:] PRISM conference, Athens.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harms-Ringdahl, L., 2003. Assessing safety functions - Results from a case study at an industrial workplace, Safety Science, 41(8), 701-720, doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(02)00019-X10.1016/S0925-7535(02)00019-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harms-Ringdahl, L., 2013. Guide to safety analysis for accident prevention, IRS Riskhantering, AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hauge, S., Krakenes, T., Habrekke, S., Johansen, G., Merz, M., Onshus, T., 2011. Barriers to Prevent and Limit Acute Releases to Sea – SINTEF A20727Report. SINTEF.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hollnagel, E., 2004. Barrier and accident prevention, Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hollnagel, E., 2008. Risk + barriers = Safety? Safety Science, 46, 221-229, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.02810.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.028
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, W. G., 1980. MORT safety assurance systems, New York: Marcel Dekker.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kang, J., Zhang, J., Gao, J., 2016. Analysis of the safety barrier function: Accident caused by the failure of safety berries and quantitative evaluation of their performance, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 43, 361-372, doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.06.01010.1016/j.jlp.2016.06.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kecklund, L. J., Edland, A., Wedin, P., Svenson, O., 1996. Safety barrier function analysis in a process industry: A nuclear power application, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 17(3), 275–284, doi: 10.1016/0169-8141(94)00112-X10.1016/0169-8141(94)00112-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Klimecka-Tatar, D., Niciejewska, M., 2016. The OSH management system in the “small-sized” production company, Production Engineering Archives,13(4), 49-52, DOI: 10.30657/pea.2016.13.1110.30657/pea.2016.13.11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neogy, P., Hanson, A. L., Davis, P. R., Fenstermacher, T. E., 1996. Hazard and Barrier analysis guidance document, Rev. 0. US Department of Energy (DoE), EH-33 Office of Operating Experience Analysis and Feedback.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NORSOK, 2008. S-001 Technical safety (edition 4, February 2008).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pitblado, R., Fisher, M., Nelson, B., FlØtaker, Molazemi, K., Stokke, A., 2016. Concepts for dynamic barrier management, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industry, 43, 741746, doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.07.00510.1016/j.jlp.2016.07.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PSA, 2013. Principles for Barrier Management in the Petroleum Industry. Norway Petroleum Safety Authority. www.ptil.no
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reason, J. 1997. Managing the risks of organizational accidents, Aldershot: Ashgate.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosness, R., 2005. Ten thumbs and zero accidents? About fault tolerance and accidents. Kjeller: Institute for Energy Technology.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sklet, S., Hauge, S., 2004. Reflections on the concept of safety barriers, [In:] PSAM7-ESREL 2004, Berlin.10.1007/978-0-85729-410-4_16
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sklet S., 2006. Safety barriers: Definition, classification, and performance, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industry, 19, 494-506, doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2005.12.00410.1016/j.jlp.2005.12.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sobral, J, Guedes Soares, C., 2019. Assessment of the adequacy of safety barriers to hazards, Safety Science, 114, 40-48, doi: 10.1016.j.ssci.2018.12.02110.1016/j.ssci.2018.12.021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tabor, J., 2015. Management of Technical Prevention Systems in Manufacturing Companies, Polish Journal of Management Studies, 12(1), 198-208.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ulewicz, R., Mazur, M., Klimecka-Tatar, D., Niciejewska, M., 2015. Wybrane aspekty zarządzania bezpieczeństwem i higiena pracy, Wyd. SMJiP, Częstochowa (in Polish).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vatn, J., 2001. SINTEF internal memo regarding safety critical functions in the railway system in Norway. Rev. 3. Trondheim: SINTEF.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Svenson, O., 1991. The accident evolution and barrier function (AEB) model applied to incident analysis in the processing industries, Risk Analysis, 11(3), 499-507, doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1991.tb00635.x10.1111/j.1539-6924.1991.tb00635.x1947355
]Search in Google Scholar