Assessing Creativity in a Greek Sample: Reliability and Validity of Two Predictors and Two Criteria

Assessing creative potential. In M.A. Runco & S. Acar (Eds.), The handbook of creativity assessment. Edward Elgar Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

Abdulla Alabbasi, A.M., Runco, M.A., & Ayoub, A. (2024c). Creative activity and accomplishment as indicators of polymathy among gifted and nongifted students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1255508 Search in Google Scholar

Abdulla Alabbasi, A.M., Runco, M.A., Acar, S., & Aljasim, F.A. (2024a). Validation of Arabic version of Runco Ideational Behavior Scale. Creativity Research Journal, 36(2), 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2022.2110731 Search in Google Scholar

Abdulla Alabbasi, A.M., Runco. M.A., & Ayoub, A. (2024b). Is creativity expressed at home related to creativity expressed at school? A re-examination of the creativity gap with gifted and nongifted students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 58(3), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.656 Search in Google Scholar

Abdulla Alabbasi, A.M., Tadik, H., Acar, S., & Runco, M.A. (2021). Birth order and divergent thinking: A meta-analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 33(4), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2021.1913559 Search in Google Scholar

Acar, S., & Runco, M.A. (2015). Thinking in multiple directions: Hyperspace categories in divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038501 Search in Google Scholar

Agnoli S., Mastria S., Kirsch, C., & Corazza G.E. (2019) Creativity in the advertisement domain: The role of experience on creative achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1899, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01899 Search in Google Scholar

Al-Hassan, T. (2024). Validation of Arabic version of the Creative Attitudes and Values Scale in two different cultures [unpublished master’s thesis]. Arabian Gulf University. Search in Google Scholar

Cabra, J.F., & & Guerrero, C.D. (2022). Regional creativity: Cultural and socio-economic differences. Journal of Creativity, 32(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2022.100022 Search in Google Scholar

Davis, G. (1999). Barriers to creativity and creative attitudes. In M.A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (1st ed., pp. 165–174). Academic Press. Search in Google Scholar

Ercikan, K., & Lyons-Thomas, J. (2013). Adapting tests for use in other languages and cultures. In K.F. Geisinger, B.A. Bracken, J.F. Carlson, J.-I. C. Hansen, N.R. Kuncel, S.P. Reise, & M.C. Rodriguez (Eds.), APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology, Vol. 3. Testing and assessment in school psychology and education (pp. 545–569). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14049-026 Search in Google Scholar

Essiz, O., Yurteri, S., Mandrik, C., & Senyuz, A. (2022). Exploring the value-action gap in green consumption: Roles of risk aversion, subjective knowledge, and gender differences. Journal of Global Marketing, 36, 67–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2022.2116376 Search in Google Scholar

Essiz, O., Yurteri, S., Mandrik, C., & Senyuz, A. (2023). Exploring the value-action gap in green consumption: Roles of risk aversion, subjective knowledge, and gender differences. Journal of Global Marketing, 36(1), 67–92. publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2022.2116376 Search in Google Scholar

Feist G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5 Search in Google Scholar

Giannouli, V. (2017). Creativity and giftedness: A study of attitudes. In Nava R. Silton (Ed.), Exploring the benefits of creativity in education, media, and the arts (pp. 179–197). IGI Global. Search in Google Scholar

Hambleton, R.K., & Lee, M.K. (2013). Methods for translating and adapting tests to increase cross-language validity. In D.H. Saklofske, C.R. Reynolds, & V.L. Schwean (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of child psychological assessment (pp. 172–181). Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Hocevar, D. (1981). Measurement of creativity: review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45(5), 450–464. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4505_1 Search in Google Scholar

Holland, J.L. (1961). Creative and academic performance among talented adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 52(3), 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044058 Search in Google Scholar

Jankowska, D.M., & Karwowski, M. (2019). Family factors and development of creative thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 142, 202–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.030 Search in Google Scholar

Kharkhurin, A.V. (2014). Creativity.4in1: Four-criterion construct of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(3), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.929424 Search in Google Scholar

Mackinnon, D.W. (1965). Personality and the realization of creative potential. American Psychologist, 20(4), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022403 Search in Google Scholar

Mumford, M.D., & Gustafson, S.B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.1.27 Search in Google Scholar

Nunnally, J.C. (1972). Psychometric theory (2nd Ed.). McGraw-Hill. Search in Google Scholar

OECD (2024), PISA 2022 Results (Volume III): Creative Minds, Creative Schools, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/765ee8c2-en Search in Google Scholar

Paek, S. (2020). Criterion problem. In M.A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (3rd ed., pp. 281-285). Academic Press. Search in Google Scholar

Paek, S.H., & Runco, M.A. (2017). Dealing with the criterion problem by measuring the quality and quantity of creative activity and accomplishment. Creativity Research Journal, 29(2), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1304078 Search in Google Scholar

Paek, S.H., Park, H., Runco, M.A., & Choe, H.S. (2016). The Contribution of Ideational Behavior to Creative Extracurricular Activities. Creativity Research Journal, 28(2), 144–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1162547 Search in Google Scholar

Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 Search in Google Scholar

Reynolds, C.R., Altmann, R.A., Allen, D.N. (2021). The problem of bias in psychological ssessment. In Mastering Modern Psychological Testing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59455-8_15 Search in Google Scholar

Richard, V., Abdulla, A.M., & Runco, M.A. (2017). Influence of skill level, experience, hours of training, and other sport participation on the creativity of elite athletes. Journal of Genius and Eminence, 2(1), 65–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.18536/jge.2017.04.02.01.07 Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M.A. (2023). Creativity: Research, development, and practice (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M.A. (2024). Assessment of creative potential: Measures, methods, and theories. In M.A. Runco & S. Acar (Eds.), Handbook of creativity assessment (pp. 40–63). Cheltenham, UK: Elgar. Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M.A. & Abdulla Alabbasi, A.M. (2024). Interactions among dimensions of divergent thinking as predictors of creative activity and accomplishments. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 53(September). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101583 Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M.A., & Abdullah, A.M. (2014). Why isn’t creativity being supported? Distressing analyses of grants and awards for creativity research–or lack thereof. Creativity Research Journal, 26(2), 248–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.901100 Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M.A., & Acar, S. (2024). Handbook of creativity assessment. Elgar. Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M.A., & Albert, R.S. (1985). The reliability and validity of ideational originality in the divergent thinking of academically gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(3), 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448504500306 Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M.A., & Jaeger, G.J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092 Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M.A., Abdulla Alabbasi, A.M., Acar, S., & Ayoub, A.E.A. (2023). Creative potential is differentially expressed in school, at home, and the natural environment. Creativity Research Journal, 35(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2022.2031437 Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M.A., Abdulla, A.M., Peak, S., Aljasim, F.A., & AlSuwaidi, H.N. (2016a). Which test of divergent thinking is best? Creativity. Theories—Research—Applications, 3, 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2016-0001 Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M.A., Acar, S., & Cayirdag, N. (2017). A closer look at the creativity gap and why students are less creative at school than outside of school. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.04.003 Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M.A., Acar, S., Campbell, W.K., Jaeger, G., McCain, J., & Gentile, B. (2016b). Comparisons of the creative class and regional creativity with perceptions of community support and community barriers. Business Creativity and the Creative Economy, 2, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.18536/bcce.2016.10.2.1.08 Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M.A., Noble, E.P., & Luptak, Y. (1990). Agreement between mothers and sons on ratings of creative activity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50(3), 673–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164490503025 Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M.A., Plucker, J.A., & Lim, W. (2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_16 Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M.A., Shepard, A., & Tadik, H. (2022). How much creative potential is expressed at work? Journal of Creativity, 32(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2021.100016 Search in Google Scholar

Sen, S. (2022). A reliability generalization meta-analysis of Runco Ideational Behavior Scale. Creativity Research Journal, 34(2), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2021.1960719 Search in Google Scholar

Shao, Y., Zhang, C., Zhou, J., Gu, T., & Yuan, Y. (2019). How does culture shape creativity? A mini-review. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1219, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01219 Search in Google Scholar

Tep, P., Maneewan, S., & Chuathong, S. (2021). Psychometric examination of Runco Ideational Behavior Scale: Thai adaptation. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 34(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-020-00170-9 Search in Google Scholar

Yang, K.-K., Hong, Z.-R., Lee, L., & Lin, H.-S. (2019). Exploring the significant predictors of convergent and divergent scientific creativities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.01.002 Search in Google Scholar

Yoon, C.-H. (2017). A validation study of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking with a sample of Korean elementary school students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.05.004 Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, S., Zhong, L., Zhang, Y., Ren, J., & Zhang, J. (2023). Development and validation of the Kaufman domains of creativity scale-Chinese short version (K-DOCS-CSV). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1–9, 48. https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101268 Search in Google Scholar

Zysberg, L., & Schenk, T. (2013). Creativity, religiosity, and political attitudes. Creativity Research Journal, 25(2), 228–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.783761 Search in Google Scholar