[
Amabile, T.M. (1996/2018). Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. Westview Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boden, M.A. (1991). The creative mind: Myths & Mechanisms. Basic Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boden, M.A. (2018). Creativity and biology. In B. Gaut & M. Kieran (Eds.), Creativity and philosophy (pp. 173–192). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bonetto, E., Pichot, N., Pavani, J.B., & Adam-Troïan, J. (2021). The paradox of creativity. New Ideas in Psychology, 60, 100820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2020.100820
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clignet, R. (1985). The Structure of Artistic Revolutions. University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/doi:10.9783/9781512801354
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crilly, N. (2010). The Structure of Design Revolutions: Kuhnian Paradigm Shifts in Creative Problem Solving. Design Issues, 26(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2010.26.1.54
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cropley, D., & Cropley, A. (2008). Elements of a universal aesthetic of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.3.155
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cropley, D., & Cropley, A. (2010). Functional creativity. In J.C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 301–318). Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Csíkszentmihályi, M., & Wolfe, R. (2014). New conceptions and research approaches to creativity: Implications of a systems perspective for creativity in education. In M. Csíkszentmihályi (Ed.), The systems model of creativity (pp. 161–184). Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haslam, S.A., Adarves-Yorno, I., Postmes, T., & Jans, L. (2013). The collective origins of valued originality: A social identity approach to creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 384–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313498001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heinich, N. (2014). Le paradigme de l’art contemporain. Structures d’une révolution artistique. Gallimard.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jaksland, R. (2021). Teaching scientific creativity through philosophy of science. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 11(4), 110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-021-00427-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaiser, D. (2012). In retrospect: the structure of scientific revolutions. Nature, 484(7393), 164–165. https://doi.org/10.1038/484164a
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaufman, J.C., & Beghetto, R.A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of general psychology, 13, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaufman, J.C., & Sternberg, R.J. (2010). Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press. Kirton, M. (1978). Have Adaptors and Innovators Equal Levels of Creativity? Psychol Rep, 42(3), 695–698. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1978.42.3.695
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ko, Y., & Kim, J. (2008). Scientific geniuses’ psychopathology as a moderator in the relation between creative contribution types and eminence. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802278677
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuhn, T.S. (2000). The road since structure. Philosophical essays, 1970–1993, with an autobiographical interview. University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, B. (2013). Difficult men: behind the scenes of a creative revolution: from The Sopranos and The Wire to Mad Men and Breaking Bad. Penguin.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Merrotsy, P. (2013). A Note on Big-C Creativity and Little-c Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 474–476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.843921
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nixon, S. (2017). Looking westwards and worshipping: The New York ‘Creative Revolution’ and British advertising, 1956–1980. Journal of Consumer Culture, 17(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540515571388
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pichot, N., Bonetto, E., Pavani, J. B., Arciszewski, T., Bonnardel, N., & Weisberg, R. W. (2022). The construct validity of creativity: empirical arguments in favor of novelty as the basis for creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 34, 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2021.1997176
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Politi, V. (2018). Scientific revolutions, specialization and the discovery of the structure of DNA: toward a new picture of the development of the sciences. Synthese, 195(5), 2267–2293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1339-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rickards, T., Runco, M.A., & Moger, S. (2009). The Routledge companion to creativity. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Runco, M. A. (2014). “Big C, Little c” Creativity as a False Dichotomy: Reality is not Categorical. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 131–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.873676
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Runco, M.A., & Jaeger, G.J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity research journal, 24, 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sanbonmatsu, D. M., & Sanbonmatsu, K. K. (2017). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions : Kuhn’s misconceptions of (normal) science. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 37(3), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000059
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sarkar, P., & Chakrabarti, A. (2008). Studying Engineering Design Creativity. In. J. Gero (Ed.), Proceedings of the NSF Workshop on Studying Design Creativity.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stein, M.I. (1987). Creativity research at the crossroads: A 1985 perspective. In S.G. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics (pp. 417–427). Bearly.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stenhouse, D. (1971). Scientific Creativity: ‘Normal’ or ‘Revolutionary’. Australian Journal of Education, 15(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494417101500205
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sternberg, R.J. (1999). A propulsion model of types of creative contributions. Review of General Psychology, 3, 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.3.2.83
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sternberg, R.J. (2020). What’s wrong with creativity testing?. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54, 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.237
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turnbull, H.W. (1959). The correspondence of Isaac Newton. The royal society.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Valente, T. (1995). Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 2, 163–164.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weisberg, R.W. (2015). On the usefulness of “value” in the definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 27(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2015.1030320
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weisberg, R.W. (2018). Response to Harrington on the definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 30(4), 461–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1537386
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Westmeyer, H. (1998). The social construction and psychological assessment of creativity. High Ability Studies, 9(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813980090102
]Search in Google Scholar
