[
1. Akerlof, G. (1970). The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 84, pp. 488-500.10.2307/1879431
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Arrow, K. J. (1965). The theory of risk aversion. Aspects of the Theory of Risk Bearing. Yrjo Jahnssonin Saatio, Helsinki.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Arrow, K. J. (1970)., Social Choice and Individual Values. Yale University Press
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Ausubel, L., M., Schwartz,J. A. (1999). The Ascending Auction Paradox. Available at http://www.market-design.com/files/ausubel-schwartz-ascendingauction-paradox.pdf [15 March 2021].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Avery, C. (1998). Strategic Jump Bidding in English Auctions. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 65, pp. 185-21010.1111/1467-937X.00041
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Bulow, J., Roberts, J. (1989). The Simple Economics of Optimal Auctions. The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 97, No. 5, pp. 1060-1090.10.1086/261643
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Cassady, R. (1967). Auctions and auctioneering. University of California Press.10.1525/9780520322257
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Clarke, E. (1971). Multipart Pricing of Public Goods. Public Choice. Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 17-33.10.1007/BF01726210
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Dasgupta, P., Maskin, E. (2000). Efficient Auctions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 95, pp. 341-388.10.1162/003355300554755
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R., Milgrom, P., Weber, R. (1983). Competitive Bidding with Proprietary Information. Journal of Mathematical Economics, Vol. 11, pp. 161-169.10.1016/0304-4068(83)90034-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Faruk, G., Stacchetti, E. (2000). The English Auction with Differentiated Commodities. Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 92, No. 1, pp. 66-95.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Fibich, G., Gavish, N. (2011). Numerical simulations of asymmetric first-price auctions. Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 73, No. 2, pp. 479-495.10.1016/j.geb.2011.02.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Gabrielle, D., Gale, D., Sotomayor, M. (1986). Multi-item Auctions. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, pp. 863-872.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Gibbard, A. (1973). Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result. Econometrica, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 587-601.10.2307/1914083
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Graham, D., Marshall, R. (1987). Collusive Bidder Behavior at Single Object, Second-Price and English Auctions. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 95, pp. 1217-1239.10.1086/261512
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Green, J. R., Laffont, J. J. (1979). Incentives in public decision making. North-Holland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Green, J., Laffont, J. J. (1977). Characterization of satisfactory mechanisms for the revelation of preferences for public goods. Econometrica, Vol. 45, pp. 427-438.10.2307/1911219
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Griesmer, J., Levitan, R., Shubik, M. (1967). Towards a Study of Bidding Processes, Part IV-Games with Unknown Costs. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, Vol. 14, pp. 415-433.10.1002/nav.3800140402
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Grossman, S. (1981). The Informational Role of Warranties and Private Disclosure about Product Quality. Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 461-483.10.1086/466995
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Groves, T. (1973). Incentives in Teams. Econometrica, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 617-631.10.2307/1914085
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Hansen, R. G. (1988). Auctions with Endogenous Quantity. Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 44-58.10.2307/2555396
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Holmstrom, B. (1977). On Incentives and Control in Organizations. Doctoral thesis, Stanford University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Holmstrom, B. (1979). Groves Schemes on Restricted Domains. Econometrica, Vol. 47, pp. 1137-1144.10.2307/1911954
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Holmstrom, B., Milgrom,P. (1987). Aggregation and Linearity in the Provision of Intertemporal Incentives. Econometrica, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 303-328.10.2307/1913238
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Hurwicz, L. (1973). The Design of Mechanisms for Resource Allocation. American Economic Review, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 1-30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Kerry, B., Zender, J. F. (1993). Auctions of Divisible Goods: On the Rationale for the Treasury Experiment. Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 733-764.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Klemperer, P., Meyer, M. (1989). Supply Function Equilibria in Oligopoly under Uncertainty. Econometrica, Vol. 57, No. 6, pp. 1243-1277.10.2307/1913707
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Kunimoto, T. (2008). Lecture notes on auctions. Department of Economics, McGill University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Laffont, J. J., Maskin, E. (1980). A Differentiable Approach to Dominant Strategy Mechanisms. Econometrica, Vol. 48, pp. 1507-1520.10.2307/1912821
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Levin, D., Smith, J. L. (1994). Equilibrium in Auctions with Entry. American Economic Review, Vol. 84, No. 3, pp. 585-599.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Levin, J. (2014). Auction’s theory. Stanford University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Levine, J. (2014). Notes on the Revenue Equivalence Theorem. Available at https://www.economics.utoronto.ca/damiano/ps426/RET-Levin-Notes.pdf [15 March 2021].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Maskin, E., Riley, J. (2000). Asymmetric Auctions. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 413-438.10.1111/1467-937X.00137
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. McAfee, P., McMillan, J. (1987), Auctions and bidding. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 25, pp. 699-738.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. McAfee, R. P., McMillan, J. (1987). Auctions with Entry. Economics Letters, Vol. 23, pp. 343-348.10.1016/0165-1765(87)90142-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Milgrom, P. (1979). A Convergence Theorem for Competitive Bidding with Differential Information. Econometrica, Vol. 47, pp. 670-688.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Milgrom, P. (1986). Auction Theory. In Advances in Economic Theory: Fifth World Congress of the Econometric Society, Bewley, T. (Ed.), Cambridge University Press, London, pp. 1-32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Milgrom, P. (2004). Putting Auction Theory to Work. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Milgrom, P., Weber, R. J. (1982a). A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding. Econometrica, Vol. 50, pp. 463-483.10.2307/1911865
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Milgrom, P., Weber, R. J. (1982b). The Value of Information in a Sealed Bid Auction. Journal of Mathematical Economics, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 105-114.10.1016/0304-4068(82)90008-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Myerson, R. B. (1979). Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem. Econometrica, Vol. 47, pp. 61-73.10.2307/1912346
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Myerson, R. B. (1981). Optimal Auction Design. Mathematics of Operations Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 58-73.10.1287/moor.6.1.58
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Myerson, R. B., Satterthwaite, M. A. (1983). Efficient Mechanisms for Bilateral Trading. Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 265-281..10.1016/0022-0531(83)90048-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Ortega, R. A. (1968). Models for Competitive Bidding Under Uncertainty. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. Rassenti, S. J., Bulfin, R. L., Smith, V. (1982). A Combinatorial Auction Mechanism for Airport Time Slot Allocation. Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 13, pp. 402-417.10.2307/3003463
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Riley, J., Samuelson, W. (1981). Optimal auctions. The American Economic Review, Vol. 71, No. 3, pp. 381-392.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. Rothkopf, M. H. (1969). A Model of Rational Competitive Bidding. Management Science, Vol. 15, pp. 362-373.10.1287/mnsc.15.7.362
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. Satterthwaite, M. A. (1975). Strategy-proofness and Arrow’s conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare function. Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 187-217.10.1016/0022-0531(75)90050-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. Vickrey, W. (1961). Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders. The Journal of Finance, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 8-37.10.1111/j.1540-6261.1961.tb02789.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. Vickrey, W. (1962). Auction and Bidding Games. In Recent Advances in Game Theory. The Princeton University Conference, Princeton, pp. 15-27.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. Vickrey, W. (1976). Auctions Markets and Optimum Allocations. In Bidding and Auctioning for Procurement and Allocation: Studies in Game Theory and Mathematical Economics, Amihud, Y. (Ed.), New York University Press, New York, pp. 13-20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
52. Wilson, R. (1967). Competitive Bidding with Asymmetric Information. Management Science, Vol. 13, No. 11, pp. 816-820.10.1287/mnsc.13.11.816
]Search in Google Scholar
[
53. Wilson, R. (1969). Competitive Bidding with Disparate Information. Management Science, Vol. 15, No. 7, pp. 446-448.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
54. Wilson, R. (1977). A Bidding Model of Perfect Competition. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 511-518.10.2307/2296904
]Search in Google Scholar
[
55. Wilson, R. (1979). Auctions of Shares. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 93, No. 4, pp. 675-689.10.2307/1884475
]Search in Google Scholar