Zitieren

1. Jagiełło-Gruszfeld A, Pogoda K, Kłak A, Stróżek J. Zalecenia dla polityki państwa w zakresie zaawansowanego raka piersi. Warszawa: Instytut Ochrony Zdrowia; 2017. Search in Google Scholar

2. Cardoso F, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, Penault-Llorca F, Poortmans P, Rubio IT, et al. ESMO Guidelines Committee. Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2019;3:1194-220.10.1093/annonc/mdz17331161190 Search in Google Scholar

3. Helvie MA, Bevers TB. Screening mammography for average-risk women: The controversy and NCCN’s position. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018;16:1398-404.10.6004/jnccn.2018.708130442738 Search in Google Scholar

4. Gøtzsche PC. Mammography screening is harmful and should be abandoned. J R Soc Med. 2015;108:341-5.10.1177/0141076815602452458226426359135 Search in Google Scholar

5. Cancer Screening in the European Union 2017. Report on the implementation of the Council Recommendation on cancer screening. International Agency for Research on Cancer Lyon, France; 2017. Search in Google Scholar

6. Patel BK, Lobbes MBI, Lewin J. Contrast enhanced spectral mammography: A review. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2018;39:70-9.10.1053/j.sult.2017.08.00529317041 Search in Google Scholar

7. Paluch-Shimon S, Cardoso F, Sessa C, Balmana J, Cardoso MJ, Gilbert F, et al. ESMO Guidelines Committee. Prevention and screening in BRCA mutation carriers and other breast/ovarian hereditary cancer syndromes: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for cancer prevention and screening. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:v103-v110. (Erratum in: Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(suppl_4):iv167-iv168. PMID: 27664246)10.1093/annonc/mdw327 Search in Google Scholar

8. Senkus E, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, Penault-Llorca F, Poortmans P, Rutgers E, et al. ESMO Guidelines Committee. Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;26 Suppl 5:v8-30.10.1093/annonc/mdv298 Search in Google Scholar

9. D’Orsi CJ, Getty DJ, Pickett RM, Sechopoulos I, Newell MS, Gundry KR, et al. Stereoscopic digital mammography: improved specificity and reduced rate of recall in a prospective clinical trial. Radiology. 2013;266:81-8.10.1148/radiol.1212038223150865 Search in Google Scholar

10. Spak DA, Plaxco JS, Santiago L, Dryden MJ, Dogan BE. BI-RADS® fifth edition: A summary of changes. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2017;98:179-90.10.1016/j.diii.2017.01.00128131457 Search in Google Scholar

11. Paydary K, Seraj SM, Zadeh MZ, Emamzadehfard S, Shamchi SP, Gholami S, et al. The evolving role of FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of breast cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2019;21:1-10.10.1007/s11307-018-1181-329516387 Search in Google Scholar

12. Jassem J. Krzakowski M. Rak piersi. In: Zalecenia postępowania diagnostyczno-terapeutycznego w nowotworach złośliwych. Onkol Prakt Klin Edu. 2018;4:209-56. Search in Google Scholar

13. Bick U, Trimboli RM, Athanasiou A, Balleyguier C, Baltzer PAT, Bernathova M, et al. European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI), with language review by Europa Donna – The European Breast Cancer Coalition. Image-guided breast biopsy and localisation: recommendations for information to women and referring physicians by the European Society of Breast Imaging. Insights Imaging. 2020;11:12.10.1186/s13244-019-0803-x700262932025985 Search in Google Scholar

14. Giuliano AE, Edge SB, Hortobagyi GN. Eighth Edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: Breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:1783-5.10.1245/s10434-018-6486-629671136 Search in Google Scholar

15. Chen S, Liang Y, Feng Z, Wang M. Efficacy and safety of HER2 inhibitors in combination with or without pertuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:973.10.1186/s12885-019-6132-0680534631638935 Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2300-6676
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Medizin, Klinische Medizin, andere, Pharmakologie, Toxikologie, Pharmazie