Quality attributes in the non-market stated-preference based valuation of cultural goods

[1]Abbé-Decarroux, F. (1994). The perception of quality and the demand for services. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 23(1), 99–107.Abbé-DecarrouxF.1994The perception of quality and the demand for servicesJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization2319910710.1016/0167-2681(94)90100-7Search in Google Scholar

[2]Akdede, S. H., & King, J. T. (2006). Demand for and productivity analysis of Turkish public theater. Journal of Cultural Economics, 30(3), 219–231.AkdedeS. H.KingJ. T.2006Demand for and productivity analysis of Turkish public theaterJournal of Cultural Economics30321923110.1007/s10824-006-9014-7Search in Google Scholar

[3]Alberini, A., & Longo, A. (2006). Combining the travel cost and contingent behavior methods to value cultural heritage sites: Evidence from Armenia. Journal of Cultural Economics, 30(4), 287–304.AlberiniA.LongoA.2006Combining the travel cost and contingent behavior methods to value cultural heritage sites: Evidence from ArmeniaJournal of Cultural Economics30428730410.1007/s10824-006-9020-9Search in Google Scholar

[4]Alberini, A., Riganti, P., & Longo, A. (2003). Can people value the aesthetic and use services of urban sites? Evidence from a survey of belfast residents. Journal of Cultural Economics, 27(3–4), 193–213.AlberiniA.RigantiP.LongoA.2003Can people value the aesthetic and use services of urban sites? Evidence from a survey of belfast residentsJournal of Cultural Economics273–419321310.2139/ssrn.334983Search in Google Scholar

[5]Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P. R., Leamer, E. E., Radner, R., & Schuman, H. (1993). Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register, 58(10), 4601–4614.ArrowK.SolowR.PortneyP. R.LeamerE. E.RadnerR.SchumanH.1993Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuationFederal Register581046014614Search in Google Scholar

[6]Báez, A., & Herrero, L. C. (2012). Using contingent valuation and cost-benefit analysis to design a policy for restoring cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 13(3), 235–245.BáezA.HerreroL. C.2012Using contingent valuation and cost-benefit analysis to design a policy for restoring cultural heritageJournal of Cultural Heritage13323524510.1016/j.culher.2010.12.005Search in Google Scholar

[7]Báez-Montenegro, A., Bedate, A. M., Herrero, L. C., & Sanz, J. Á. (2012). Inhabitants’ willingness to pay for cultural heritage: A case study in Valdivia, Chile, using contingent valuation. Journal of Applied Economics, 15(2), 235–258.Báez-MontenegroA.BedateA. M.HerreroL. C.SanzJ. Á.2012Inhabitants’ willingness to pay for cultural heritage: A case study in Valdivia, Chile, using contingent valuationJournal of Applied Economics15223525810.1016/S1514-0326(12)60011-7Search in Google Scholar

[8]Bakhshi, H., Fujiwara, D., Lawton, R., Mourato, S., & Dolan, P. (2015). Measuring economic value in cultural institutions. Swindon, Wiltshire: Arts and Humanities Research Council.BakhshiH.FujiwaraD.LawtonR.MouratoS.DolanP.2015Measuring economic value in cultural institutionsSwindon, WiltshireArts and Humanities Research CouncilSearch in Google Scholar

[9]Bateman, I. J., Carson, R. T., Day, B., Hanemann, M. W., Hanley, N., Hett, T., ¼ Swanson, J. (2004). Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: A manual. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.BatemanI. J.CarsonR. T.DayB.HanemannM. W.HanleyN.HettT.SwansonJ.2004Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: A manual.Northampton, MAEdward ElgarSearch in Google Scholar

[10]Baumol, W. J., & Bowen, W. G. (1966). Performing arts – The economic dilemma. New York, NY: The Twentieth Century Fund.BaumolW. J.BowenW. G.1966Performing arts – The economic dilemmaNew York, NYThe Twentieth Century FundSearch in Google Scholar

[11]Beardsley, M. (1958). Aesthetics: Problems in the philosophy of Criticism. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.BeardsleyM.1958Aesthetics: Problems in the philosophy of CriticismNew York, NYHarcourt, BraceSearch in Google Scholar

[12]Bedate, A. M., Herrero, L. C., & Sanz, J. Á. (2009). Economic valuation of a contemporary art museum: Correction of hypothetical bias using a certainty question. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25(3), 185–199.BedateA. M.HerreroL. C.SanzJ. Á.2009Economic valuation of a contemporary art museum: Correction of hypothetical bias using a certainty questionJournal of Gambling Studies25318519910.1007/s10824-009-9098-ySearch in Google Scholar

[13]Behr, A., Brennan, M., & Cloonan, M. (2016). Cultural value and cultural policy: Some evidence from the world of live music. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 22(3), 403–418.BehrA.BrennanM.CloonanM.2016Cultural value and cultural policy: Some evidence from the world of live musicInternational Journal of Cultural Policy22340341810.1080/10286632.2014.987668Search in Google Scholar

[14]Bille Hansen, T. (1997). The willingness-to-pay for the royal theatre in Copenhagen as a public good. Journal of Cultural Economics, 21(1), 1–28.Bille HansenT.1997The willingness-to-pay for the royal theatre in Copenhagen as a public goodJournal of Cultural Economics21112810.1023/A:1007303016798Search in Google Scholar

[15]Bille, T., & Baldin, A. (2017). Theater management – Quality indicators and demand. Working Paper presented at 8tth European Workshop on Applied Cultural Economics.BilleT.BaldinA.2017Theater management – Quality indicators and demandWorking Paper presented at 8tth European Workshop on Applied Cultural Economics.Search in Google Scholar

[16]Bille, T., & Olsen, F. (2018). Measuring the quality and impact of arts and culture. In K. O. Eliassen, J. F. Hovden, & Ø. Prytz (Eds.), Contested qualities. Negotiating value in arts and culture (pp. 229–256). Oslo, Norway: Vigmostad & Bjørke AS.BilleT.OlsenF.2018Measuring the quality and impact of arts and cultureInEliassenK. O.HovdenJ. F.PrytzØ.(Eds.),Contested qualities. Negotiating value in arts and culture229256Oslo, NorwayVigmostad & Bjørke ASSearch in Google Scholar

[17]Carson, R. T. (2011). Contingent valuation. A comprehensive bibliography and history. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.CarsonR. T.2011Contingent valuation. A comprehensive bibliography and historyCheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USAEdward Elgar10.4337/9780857936288Search in Google Scholar

[18]Carson, R. T. (2012). Contingent valuation: A practical alternative when prices aren’t available. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(4), 27–42.CarsonR. T.2012Contingent valuation: A practical alternative when prices aren’t availableJournal of Economic Perspectives264274210.1257/jep.26.4.27Search in Google Scholar

[19]Carson, R. T., Flores, N. E., & Meade, N. F. (2001). Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics, 19(2), 173–210.CarsonR. T.FloresN. E.MeadeN. F.2001Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidenceEnvironmental and Resource Economics19217321010.1023/A:1011128332243Search in Google Scholar

[20]Champ, P. A., Boyle, K. J., & Brown, T. C. (Eds.), (2003). A primer on nonmarket valuation. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.ChampP. A.BoyleK. J.BrownT. C.(Eds.),2003A primer on nonmarket valuationNew York, NYSpringer Science+Business Media, LLC10.1007/978-94-007-0826-6Search in Google Scholar

[21]Choi, A. S., Ritchie, B. W., Papandrea, F., & Bennett, J. (2010). Economic valuation of cultural heritage sites: A choice modeling approach. Tourism Management, 31(2), 213–220.ChoiA. S.RitchieB. W.PapandreaF.BennettJ.2010Economic valuation of cultural heritage sites: A choice modeling approachTourism Management31221322010.1016/j.tourman.2009.02.014Search in Google Scholar

[22]Colbert, F., Beauregard, C., & Vallée, L. (1998). The importance of ticket prices for theatre patrons. International Journal of Arts Management, 1(1), 8–15.ColbertF.BeauregardC.ValléeL.1998The importance of ticket prices for theatre patronsInternational Journal of Arts Management11815Search in Google Scholar

[23]Corning, J., & Levy, A. (2002). Demand for live theater with market segmentation and seasonality. Journal of Cultural Economics, 26(3), 217–235.CorningJ.LevyA.2002Demand for live theater with market segmentation and seasonalityJournal of Cultural Economics26321723510.1023/A:1015673802364Search in Google Scholar

[24]Del Saz Salazar, S., & Montagud Marques, J. (2005). Valuing cultural heritage: The social benefits of restoring and old Arab tower. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 6(1), 69–77.Del Saz SalazarS.Montagud MarquesJ.2005Valuing cultural heritage: The social benefits of restoring and old Arab towerJournal of Cultural Heritage61697710.1016/j.culher.2004.09.001Search in Google Scholar

[25]Dickie, G. (1988). Evaluating art. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.DickieG.1988Evaluating artPhiladelphia, PATemple University PressSearch in Google Scholar

[26]Finn, A., Mcfadyen, S., & Hoskins, C. (2003). Valuing the Canadian broadcasting corporation valuing the Canadian broadcasting corporation. Journal of Cultural Economics, 27(3), 177–192.FinnA.McfadyenS.HoskinsC.2003Valuing the Canadian broadcasting corporation valuing the Canadian broadcasting corporationJournal of Cultural Economics27317719210.1023/A:1026352903371Search in Google Scholar

[27]Frey, B. S. (2003). Arts & economics. Analysis & cultural policy. Berlin Heidelberg New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.FreyB. S.2003Arts & economics. Analysis & cultural policyBerlin Heidelberg New York, NYSpringer-Verlag10.1007/978-3-540-24695-4Search in Google Scholar

[28]Garrod, G. D., Willis, K. G., Bjarnadottir, H., & Cockbain, P. (1996). The Non-Priced Benefits of Renovating Historic Buildings A Case Study of Newcastle’ s Grainger Town. Cities, 13(6), 423–30.GarrodG. D.WillisK. G.BjarnadottirH.CockbainP.1996The Non-Priced Benefits of Renovating Historic Buildings A Case Study of Newcastle’ s Grainger TownCities1364233010.1016/0264-2751(96)00029-7Search in Google Scholar

[29]Ginsburgh, V., & Weyers, S. (2008). Quantitative approaches to valuation in the arts, with an application to movies. In D. Throsby & M. Hutter (Eds.), Beyond price. Value in culture, economics, and the arts. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 179–199.GinsburghV.WeyersS.2008Quantitative approaches to valuation in the arts, with an application to moviesInThrosbyD.HutterM.(Eds.),Beyond price. Value in culture, economics, and the artsNew York, NYCambridge University Press17919910.1017/CBO9780511793820.012Search in Google Scholar

[30]Government of Western Australia. (2014). Public value measurement framework. Measuring the quality of the arts. Australia and UK : Department of Culture and the Arts Western Australia and John Knell, Intelligence Agency Ltd.Government of Western Australia2014Public value measurement framework. Measuring the quality of the artsAustralia and UKDepartment of Culture and the Arts Western Australia and John Knell, Intelligence Agency LtdSearch in Google Scholar

[31]Grisolía, J. M., & Willis, K. G. (2011). An evening at the theatre: Using choice experiments to model preferences for theatres and theatrical productions. Applied Economics, 43(27), 3987–3998.GrisolíaJ. M.WillisK. G.2011An evening at the theatre: Using choice experiments to model preferences for theatres and theatrical productionsApplied Economics43273987399810.1080/00036841003742637Search in Google Scholar

[32]Grisolía, J. M., & Willis, K. G. (2012). A latent class model of theatre demand. Journal of Cultural Economics, 36(2), 113–139.GrisolíaJ. M.WillisK. G.2012A latent class model of theatre demandJournal of Cultural Economics36211313910.1007/s10824-012-9158-6Search in Google Scholar

[33]Grisolía, J. M., & Willis, K. G. (2016). Consumer choice of theatrical productions : A combined revealed preference – stated preference approach. Empirical Economics, 50(3), 933–957.GrisolíaJ. M.WillisK. G.2016Consumer choice of theatrical productions : A combined revealed preference – stated preference approachEmpirical Economics50393395710.1007/s00181-015-0948-5Search in Google Scholar

[34]Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2005). Applied choice analysis: A primer. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.HensherD. A.RoseJ. M.GreeneW. H.2005Applied choice analysis: A primerCambridge, EnglandCambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511610356Search in Google Scholar

[35]Hess, S., & Daly, A. (Eds.), (2014). Handbook of choice modelling. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.HessS.DalyA.(Eds.),2014Handbook of choice modellingNorthampton, MAEdward Elgar10.4337/9781781003152Search in Google Scholar

[36]Hutter, M., & Throsby, D. (Eds.), (2008). Beyond price. value in culture, economics, and the arts. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.HutterM.ThrosbyD.(Eds.),2008Beyond price. value in culture, economics, and the artsNew York, NYCambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511793820Search in Google Scholar

[37]Kanninen, B. J. (Ed.). (2007). Valuing environmental amenities using stated choice studies. A common sense approach to theory and practice. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.KanninenB. J.(Ed.).2007Valuing environmental amenities using stated choice studies. A common sense approach to theory and practiceDordrecht, NetherlandsSpringer10.1007/1-4020-5313-4Search in Google Scholar

[38]Knell, J., & Whitaker, A. (2016). Quality metrics final report. Quality metrics national test. Culture counts. UK: Arts Council England.KnellJ.WhitakerA.2016Quality metrics final report. Quality metrics national test. Culture countsUKArts Council EnglandSearch in Google Scholar

[39]Krebs, S., & Pommerehne, W. W. (1995). Politico-economic interactions of German public performing arts institutions. Journal of Cultural Economics, 19(1), 17–32.KrebsS.PommerehneW. W.1995Politico-economic interactions of German public performing arts institutionsJournal of Cultural Economics191173210.1007/BF01074430Search in Google Scholar

[40]Krutilla, J. V. (1967). Conservation reconsidered. The American Economic Review, 57(4), 777–786.KrutillaJ. V.1967Conservation reconsideredThe American Economic Review574777786Search in Google Scholar

[41]Lancester, K. J. 1966. A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132–157.LancesterK. J.1966A new approach to consumer theoryJournal of Political Economy74213215710.1086/259131Search in Google Scholar

[42]Lloyd-Smith, P., Zawojska, E., & Adamowicz, W. (2018). Moving beyond the CV versus CE – Presentation effects in stated preference. Faculty of Economic Sciences Working Paper Series 14.Lloyd-SmithP.ZawojskaE.AdamowiczW.2018Moving beyond the CV versus CE – Presentation effects in stated preferenceFaculty of Economic Sciences Working Paper Series 14.Search in Google Scholar

[43]Lundhede, T., Bille, T., & Hasler, B. (2013). Exploring preferences and non-use values for hidden archaeological artefacts: A case from Denmark. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 19(4), 501–530.LundhedeT.BilleT.HaslerB.2013Exploring preferences and non-use values for hidden archaeological artefacts: A case from DenmarkInternational Journal of Cultural Policy19450153010.1080/10286632.2011.652624Search in Google Scholar

[44]Maddison, D., & Foster, T. (2003). Valuing congestion costs in the British museum. Oxford Economic Papers, 55(1), 173–190.MaddisonD.FosterT.2003Valuing congestion costs in the British museumOxford Economic Papers55117319010.1093/oep/55.1.173Search in Google Scholar

[45]Martin, F. (1994). Determining the size of museum subsidies. Journal of Cultural Economics, 18(4), 255–270.MartinF.1994Determining the size of museum subsidiesJournal of Cultural Economics18425527010.1007/BF01079759Search in Google Scholar

[46]Mazzanti, M. (2002). Cultural heritage as multidimensional, multi-value and multi-attribute economic good: Toward a new framework fro economic analysis and valuation. Journal of Socio-Economics, 31(5), 529–558.MazzantiM.2002Cultural heritage as multidimensional, multi-value and multi-attribute economic good: Toward a new framework fro economic analysis and valuationJournal of Socio-Economics31552955810.1016/S1053-5357(02)00133-6Search in Google Scholar

[47]Mazzanti, M. (2003). Valuing cultural heritage in a multi-attribute framework microeconomic perspectives and policy implications. Journal of Socio-Economics, 32(5), 549–569.MazzantiM.2003Valuing cultural heritage in a multi-attribute framework microeconomic perspectives and policy implicationsJournal of Socio-Economics32554956910.1016/j.socec.2003.08.009Search in Google Scholar

[48]Morey, E., & Rossmann, K. G. (2003). Using stated-preference questions to investigate variations in willingness to pay for preserving marble monuments: Classic heterogeneity, random parameters, and mixture models. Journal of Cultural Economics, 27(3–4), 215–229.MoreyE.RossmannK. G.2003Using stated-preference questions to investigate variations in willingness to pay for preserving marble monuments: Classic heterogeneity, random parameters, and mixture modelsJournal of Cultural Economics273–421522910.1023/A:1026365125898Search in Google Scholar

[49]Morrison, W. G., & West, E. G. (1986). Subsidies for the performing arts: evidence on voter preference. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 15(3), 57–72.MorrisonW. G.WestE. G.1986Subsidies for the performing arts: evidence on voter preferenceJournal of Behavioral Economics153577210.1016/0090-5720(86)90051-3Search in Google Scholar

[50]Mourato, S., & Mazzanti, M. (2002). Economic valuation of cultural heritage: Evidence and prospects. In M. de la Torre (Ed.), Assessing the values of cultural heritage (pp. 51–76). Los Angeles, CA: The Getty Conservation Institute.MouratoS.MazzantiM.2002Economic valuation of cultural heritage: Evidence and prospectsInde la TorreM.(Ed.),Assessing the values of cultural heritage5176Los Angeles, CAThe Getty Conservation InstituteSearch in Google Scholar

[51]Noonan, D. (2002). Contingent valuation studies in the arts and culture: An annotated bibliography. The Cultural Policy Center at the University of Chicago Working Paper Series.NoonanD.2002Contingent valuation studies in the arts and culture: An annotated bibliographyThe Cultural Policy Center at the University of Chicago Working Paper Series.Search in Google Scholar

[52]Noonan, D. S. (2003). Contingent valuation and cultural resources: A meta-analytic review of the literature. Journal of Cultural Economics, 27, 1–24.NoonanD. S.2003Contingent valuation and cultural resources: A meta-analytic review of the literatureJournal of Cultural Economics2712410.1023/A:1026371110799Search in Google Scholar

[53]O’Brien, D. (2010). Measuring the value of culture: A report to the department for culture media and sport. London.O’BrienD.2010Measuring the value of culture: A report to the department for culture media and sportLondonSearch in Google Scholar

[54]O’Hagan, J., & Zieba, M. (2010). Output characteristics and other determinants of theatre attendance – An econometric analysis of German data. Applied Economics Quarterly, 56(2), 147–174.O’HaganJ.ZiebaM.2010Output characteristics and other determinants of theatre attendance – An econometric analysis of German dataApplied Economics Quarterly56214717410.3790/aeq.56.2.147Search in Google Scholar

[55]Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2006). Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: Recent developments. Paris, France.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development2006Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: Recent developmentsParis, FranceSearch in Google Scholar

[56]Papandrea, F. (1999). Willingness to pay for domestic television programming. Journal of Cultural Economics, 23, 149–166.PapandreaF.1999Willingness to pay for domestic television programmingJournal of Cultural Economics2314916610.1023/A:1007571812251Search in Google Scholar

[57]Peterson, R. (1992). Understanding audience segmentation: From elite and mass to omnivore and univore. Poetics, 21, 243–258.PetersonR.1992Understanding audience segmentation: From elite and mass to omnivore and univorePoetics2124325810.1016/0304-422X(92)90008-QSearch in Google Scholar

[58]Randall, A., Ives, B., & Eastman, C. (1974). Bidding games for valuation of aesthetic environmental improvements. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1(2), 132–149.RandallA.IvesB.EastmanC.1974Bidding games for valuation of aesthetic environmental improvementsJournal of Environmental Economics and Management1213214910.1016/0095-0696(74)90010-2Search in Google Scholar

[59]Santagata, W., & Signorello, G. (2000). Contingent valuation and cultural policy design: The case of ‘Napoli Musei Aperti.’ Journal of Cultural Economics, 24, 181–204.SantagataW.SignorelloG.2000Contingent valuation and cultural policy design: The case of ‘Napoli Musei Aperti.’Journal of Cultural Economics2418120410.2139/ssrn.135669Search in Google Scholar

[60]Sanz, J. A., Herrero, L. C., & Bedate, A. M. (2003). Contingent valuation and semiparametric methods: A case study of the national museum of sculpture in Valladolid, Spain. Journal of Cultural Economics, 27(3–4), 241–257.SanzJ. A.HerreroL. C.BedateA. M.2003Contingent valuation and semiparametric methods: A case study of the national museum of sculpture in Valladolid, SpainJournal of Cultural Economics273–424125710.1023/A:1026353218280Search in Google Scholar

[61]Schwarz, N., & Sudman, S. (1992). Context effects in social and psychological research. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.SchwarzN.SudmanS.1992Context effects in social and psychological researchNew York, NYSpringer-Verlag10.1007/978-1-4612-2848-6Search in Google Scholar

[62]Snowball, J. D. (2005). Art for the masses? Justification for the public support of the arts in developing countries – Two arts festivals in South Africa. Journal of Cultural Economics, 29(2), 107–125.SnowballJ. D.2005Art for the masses? Justification for the public support of the arts in developing countries – Two arts festivals in South AfricaJournal of Cultural Economics29210712510.1007/s10824-005-5064-5Search in Google Scholar

[63]Snowball, J. D. (2008). Measuring the value of culture - Methods and examples in cultural economics. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.SnowballJ. D.2008Measuring the value of culture - Methods and examples in cultural economicsBerlin HeidelbergSpringer-VerlagSearch in Google Scholar

[64]Tobias, S. (2004). Quality in the performing arts: Aggregating and rationalizing expert opinion. Journal of Cultural Economics, 28(2), 109–124.TobiasS.2004Quality in the performing arts: Aggregating and rationalizing expert opinionJournal of Cultural Economics28210912410.1023/B:JCEC.0000019472.97483.8cSearch in Google Scholar

[65]Throsby, C. D. (1990). Perception of quality in demand for the theatre. Journal of Cultural Economics, 14(1), 65–82.ThrosbyC. D.1990Perception of quality in demand for the theatreJournal of Cultural Economics141658210.1007/BF02268198Search in Google Scholar

[66]Throsby, D. (1994). The production and consumption of the arts: A view of cultural economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 32(1), 1–29.ThrosbyD.1994The production and consumption of the arts: A view of cultural economicsJournal of Economic Literature321129Search in Google Scholar

[67]Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and culture. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.ThrosbyD.2001Economics and cultureCambridge, EnglandCambridge University PressSearch in Google Scholar

[68]Throsby, D. (2003). Determining the value of cultural goods: How much (or HowLittle) does contingent valuation tell us? Journal of Cultural Economics, 27, 275–285.ThrosbyD.2003Determining the value of cultural goods: How much (or HowLittle) does contingent valuation tell us?Journal of Cultural Economics2727528510.1023/A:1026353905772Search in Google Scholar

[69]Throsby, D., & Withers, G. A. (1979). The economics of the performing arts. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.ThrosbyD.WithersG. A.1979The economics of the performing artsNew York, NYSt. Martin’s PressSearch in Google Scholar

[70]H.M. Treasury. (2018). The green book. Central government guidance on appraisal and evaluation. London, UK: OGL Press.H.M. Treasury2018The green book. Central government guidance on appraisal and evaluationLondon, UKOGL PressSearch in Google Scholar

[71]Tuan, T. H., & Navrud, S. (2007). Valuing cultural heritage in developing countries: Comparing and pooling contingent valuation and choice modelling estimates. Environmental and Resource Economics, 38(1), 51–69.TuanT. H.NavrudS.2007Valuing cultural heritage in developing countries: Comparing and pooling contingent valuation and choice modelling estimatesEnvironmental and Resource Economics381516910.1007/s10640-006-9056-5Search in Google Scholar

[72]Urrutiaguer, D. (2002). Quality judgements and demand for French public theatre. Journal of Cultural Economics, 26(3), 185–202.UrrutiaguerD.2002Quality judgements and demand for French public theatreJournal of Cultural Economics26318520210.1023/A:1015696816657Search in Google Scholar

[73]US Office of Management and Budget. (1992). Circular No. A-94 Revised (Transmittal Memo No. 64). Washington, DC.US Office of Management and Budget1992Circular No. A-94 Revised (Transmittal Memo No. 64)Washington, DCSearch in Google Scholar

[74]Werck, K., & Heyndels, B. (2007). Programmatic choices and the demand for theatre: The case of Flemish theatres. Journal of Cultural Economics, 31(1), 25–41.WerckK.HeyndelsB.2007Programmatic choices and the demand for theatre: The case of Flemish theatresJournal of Cultural Economics311254110.1007/s10824-006-9026-3Search in Google Scholar

[75]Whitehead, J. C., & Finney, S. S. (2003). Willingness to pay for submerged maritime cultural resources. Journal of Cultural Economics, 27(3–4), 231–240.WhiteheadJ. C.FinneyS. S.2003Willingness to pay for submerged maritime cultural resourcesJournal of Cultural Economics273–423124010.1023/A:1026384602020Search in Google Scholar

[76]Willis, K. G., & Snowball, J. D. (2009). Investigating how the attributes of live theatre productions influence consumption choices using conjoint analysis: The example of the national arts festival, South Africa. Journal of Cultural Economics, 33(3), 167–183.WillisK. G.SnowballJ. D.2009Investigating how the attributes of live theatre productions influence consumption choices using conjoint analysis: The example of the national arts festival, South AfricaJournal of Cultural Economics33316718310.1007/s10824-009-9097-zSearch in Google Scholar

[77]Wiśniewska, A., & Czajkowski, M. (2017). Designing a socially efficient cultural policy: The case of municipal theaters in Warsaw. International Journal of Cultural Policy, doi:10.1080/10286632.2017.1308504.WiśniewskaA.CzajkowskiM.2017Designing a socially efficient cultural policy: The case of municipal theaters in WarsawInternational Journal of Cultural Policy10.1080/10286632.2017.1308504Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[78]Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations. New York, NY: Macmillan.WittgensteinL.1958Philosophical investigationsNew York, NYMacmillanSearch in Google Scholar

[79]Zieba, M. (2009). Full-income and price elasticities of demand for German public theatre. Journal of Cultural Economics, 33(2), 85–108.ZiebaM.2009Full-income and price elasticities of demand for German public theatreJournal of Cultural Economics3328510810.1007/s10824-009-9094-2Search in Google Scholar

[80]Zieba, M. (2011). An analysis of technical efficiency and efficiency factors for Austrian and Swiss non-profit theatres. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 147(1998), 233–274.ZiebaM.2011An analysis of technical efficiency and efficiency factors for Austrian and Swiss non-profit theatresSwiss Journal of Economics and Statistics147199823327410.1007/BF03399346Search in Google Scholar