Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Scientific Aspects of Organic Soy Production in Ukraine

, ,  und   
05. Feb. 2025

Zitieren
COVER HERUNTERLADEN

Alaru M, Talgre L, Eremeev V, Tein B, Luik A, Nemvalts A, et al. Crop yields and supply of nitrogen compared in conventional and organic farming systems. Agricult Food Sci. 2014;23(4):317-26. DOI: 10.23986/afsci.46422. Search in Google Scholar

Dumpis J, Lagzdins A, Sics I. Delineation of catchment area for the lake Kisezers for environmental sustainability. Agron Res. 2021;19(4):1718-33. DOI: 10.15159/AR.21.137. Search in Google Scholar

Peters HP. Scientists as public experts. In: Bucchi M, Trench B, editors. Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. London: Routledge. 2014, p. 131-46. DOI: 10.4324/9780203483794. Search in Google Scholar

Bakhmat M, Padalko T, Krachan T, Tkach O, Pantsyreva H, Tkach L. Formation of the yield of Matricaria recutita and indicators of food value of Sychorium intybus by technological methods of co-cultivation in the interrows of an orchard. J Ecol Eng. 2023;24(8):250-9. DOI: 10.12911/22998993/166553. Search in Google Scholar

Mazur VA, Myalkovsky RO, Pantsyreva HV, Didur IM, Mazur KV, Alekseev OO. Photosynthetic productivity of potato plants depending on the location of rows placement in agrophytocenosis. Ecol Environ Conservation. 2020;2:536-45. Search in Google Scholar

Hnatiuk TT, Zhitkevich NV, Petrychenko VF, Kalinichenko AV, Patyka VP. Soybean diseases caused by genus Pseudomonas phytopathenes bacteria. Microbiology. 2019;81(3):68-83. DOI: 10.15407/microbiolj81.03.068. Search in Google Scholar

Battistini C, Gullón B, Ichimura ES, Gomes AMP, Ribeiro EP, Kunigk L, et al. Development and characterization of an innovative synbiotic fermented beverage based on vegetable soybean. Brazilian J Microbiology. 2017;49(2):303-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.08.006. Search in Google Scholar

Puyu V, Bakhmat M, Khmelianchyshyn Y, Stepanchenko V, Bakhmat O, Pantsyreva H. Social-and-ecological aspects of forage production reform in Ukraine in the early 21st century. Eur J Sust Develop. 2021;10(1):221-8. DOI: 10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n1p221. Search in Google Scholar

Pawlewicz A, Brodzinska K, Zvirbule A, Popluga D. Trends in the development of organic farming in Poland and Latvia compared to the EU. Rural Sust Res. 2020;43(388):1-8. DOI: 10.2478/plua-2020-0001. Search in Google Scholar

Onufran, LI, Netis VI. Absorption and use of solar energy by soybean crops under different growing conditions. Bull Agrarian Sci Black Sea Coast. 2017;2(94):107-15. DOI: 10.31521/2313-092X. Search in Google Scholar

Jansson T, Andersen HE, Gustafsson BG, Hasler B, Höglind L, Choi H. Baltic Sea eutrophication status is not improved by the first pillar of the European Union Common Agricultural Policy. Regional Environ Change. 2019;19(8):2465-76. DOI: 10.1007/s10113-019-01559-8. Search in Google Scholar

Gorodiska I, Plaksyuk L, Gorodiska I, Chub A. Award for biopreparations for the minds of organic production of soy. Bull Agrarian Sci. 2018;9:73-8. DOI: 10.31073/agrovisnyk201809-11. Search in Google Scholar

Keres I, Alaru M, Eremeev V, Talgre L, Luik A, Loit E. Long-term effect of farming systems on the yield of crop rotation and soil nutrient content. Agricult Food Sci. 2020;29(3):210-21. DOI: 10.23986/afsci.85221. Search in Google Scholar

Zhao J, Bindi M, Eitzinger J, Ferrise R, Gaile Z, Gobin A, et al. Priority for climate adaptation measures in European crop production systems. European J Agronomy. 2022;138:126516. DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2022.126516. Search in Google Scholar

Ramakrishnan B, Maddel NR, Venkateswarlu K, Megharaj M. Organic farming: Does it contribute to contaminant-free produce and ensure food safety? Sci Total Environ. 2021;769:145079. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145079. Search in Google Scholar

Jensen P, Kreimer P, Rouquier JB, Croissant Y. Scientists who engage with society perform better academically. Sci Public Policy. 2008;35(7):527-41. DOI: 10.3152/030234208X329130. Search in Google Scholar

Hendriks F, Kienhues D, Bromme R. Trust in Science and the Science of Trust. In: Blöbaum B, editor. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World. Models and Concepts of Trust Research. Springer; 2016;1:143-59. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-28059-2_8. Search in Google Scholar

Weingart P, Joubert M. The conflation of motives of science communication - causes, consequences, remedies. J Sci Comm. 2019;18(3):Y01. DOI: 10.22323/2.18030401. Search in Google Scholar

Mahmood N, Arshad M, Kächele H, Ma H, Ullah A, Müller K. Wheat yield response to input and socioeconomic factors under changing climate: Evidence from rainfed environments of Pakistan. Sci Total Environ. 2019;688:1275-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.266. Search in Google Scholar

Pantsyreva H, Vovk V, Bronnicova L, Zabarna T. Efficiency of the use of lawn grasses for biology and soil conservation of agricultural systems under the conditions of the Ukraine’s Podillia. J Ecol Eng. 2023;24(11):249-56. DOI: 10.12911/22998993/171649. Search in Google Scholar

Nicholas KA, Villemoes F, Lehsten EA, Brady MV. Scown MW. A harmonized and spatially explicit dataset from 16 million payments from the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy for 2015. Patterns. 2021;2(4):100236. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100236. Search in Google Scholar

Ivanyshyn O, Khomina V, Pantsyreva H. Influence of fertilization on the formation of grain productivity in different-maturing maize hybrids. Ukr J Ecol. 2021;11(3):262-9. DOI: 10.15421/2021_170. Search in Google Scholar

Marconi V, Raggi M, Viaggi D. Assessing the impact of RDP agri-environment measures on the use of nitrogen-based mineral fertilizers through spatial econometrics: The case study of Emilia-Romagna (Italy). Ecol Indicators. 2015;59:27-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.02.037. Search in Google Scholar

Maxwell SL, Fuller RA, Brooks TM, Watson JEM. Biodiversity: The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers. Nature. 2016;536(7615):143-145. DOI: 10.1038/536143a. Search in Google Scholar

Young N, Matthews R. Experts’ understanding of the public: Knowledge control in a risk controversy. Public Underst Sci. 2007;16(2):123-44. DOI: 10.1177/0963662507060586. Search in Google Scholar

Kramarova L, Prokša M. Pupils’ preconceptions about heat, temperature and energy. Chem Didact Ecol Metrol. 2020;25(1-2):79-91. DOI: 10.2478/cdem-2020-0005. Search in Google Scholar

González PA, Dans EP, Dacal ACA, Peña MZ, Luzardo OP. Differences in the levels of sulphites and pesticide residues in soils and wines and under organic and conventional production methods. J Food Composition Analysis. 2022;112. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104714. Search in Google Scholar

Pantsyreva H. Morphological and ecological-biological evaluation of the decorative species of the genus Lupinus L. Ukr J Ecol. 2021;9(3):74-7. DOI: 10.15421/2019_711. Search in Google Scholar

Sirtori CR. Risks and benefits of soy phytoestrogens in cardiovascular diseases, cancer, climacteric symptoms and osteoporosis. Drug Saf. 2001;24:665-82. DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200124090-00003. Search in Google Scholar

Calaf GM, Ponce-Cusi R, Aguayo F, Munoz JP, Bleak TC. Endocrine disruptors from the environment affecting breast cancer. Oncol Lett. 2020;20:19-32. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2020.11566. Search in Google Scholar

Petrine JCP, Del Bianco-Borges B. The influence of phytoestrogens on different physiological and pathological processes: An overview. Phytother Res. 2021;35:180-97. DOI: 10.1002/ptr.6816. Search in Google Scholar

Krizova L, Dadakova K, Kasparovska J, Kasparovsky T. Isoflavones. Molecules. 2019;24:1076. DOI: 10.3390/molecules24061076. Search in Google Scholar

Sergiienko V, Shyta O, Khudolii A. The effect of fungicides on the development of diseases and soybean yield in the Forest steppe of Ukraine. Quarantine Plant Protection. 2021;(3):18-23. DOI: 10.36495/2312-0614.2021.3.18-23. Search in Google Scholar

Bajwa SG, Rupe JC, Mason J. Soybean disease monitoring with leaf reflectance. Remote Sens. 2017;9(2):127. DOI: 10.3390/rs9020127. Search in Google Scholar

Zhao J, Bindi M, Eitzinger J, Ferrise R, Gaile Z, Gobin A, et al. Priority for climate adaptation measures in European crop production systems. Europ J Agronomy. 2022;138:126516. DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2022.126516. Search in Google Scholar

Giampieri F, Mazzoni L, Cianciosi D, Alvarez-Suarez JM, Regolo L, Sánchez González C, et al. Organic vs conventional plant-based foods: A review. Food Chem. 2022;383:13-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132352. Search in Google Scholar

Ramakrishnan B, Maddela NR, Venkateswarlu K, Megharaj M. Organic farming: Does it contribute to contaminant-free produce and ensure food safety? Sci Total Environ. 2021;769:145079. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145079. Search in Google Scholar

Kuht J, Eremeev V, Talgre L, Madsen H, Toom M, Maeorg E. et al. Soil weed seed bank and factors influencing the number of weeds at the end of conversion period to organic production. Agronomy Res. 2016; 14(4):1372-9. Available from: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/20173199282. Search in Google Scholar

Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Chemie, Chemie, andere