The Implementation of Credit Risk Scorecard Using Ontology Design Patterns and BCBS 239

1. BCBS (n.d.). The Basel Committee – Overview. Retrieved September 2019. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/index.htmSearch in Google Scholar

2. BCBS (n.d.). Principles for Effective Risk Data Aggregation and Risk Reporting. Retrieved September 2019. https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs239.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

3. Prorokowski, L., H. Prorokowski. Solutions for Risk Data Compliance under BCBS 239. – Journal of Investment Compliance, 2 November 2015, pp. 66-77.10.1108/JOIC-01-2015-0015Search in Google Scholar

4. Chandrasekaran, B., J. Josephson, R. Benjamins. What Are Ontologies, and Why Do We Need Them? – Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, IEEE, Vol. 14, 1999, pp. 20-26.10.1109/5254.747902Search in Google Scholar

5. Gruber, T. A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. – Knowledge Acquisition, 1993, pp. 199-220. DOI:10.1006/knac.1993.1008.10.1006/knac.1993.1008Search in Google Scholar

6. Cruz, I., H. Xiao, AdvisLab. The Role of Ontologies in Data Integration. – Jounal of Engineering Intelligent Systems, Vol. 13, 2005, No 4, pp. 1-18.Search in Google Scholar

7. Gagnon, M. Ontology-Based Integration of Data Sources. – In: Proc. of 10th International Conference on Information Fusion, Quebec, Canada, 2007, pp. 1-8.10.1109/ICIF.2007.4408086Search in Google Scholar

8. Subirats, L., R. Gil, R. García. Personalization of Ontologies Visualization: Use Case of Diabetes. – In: G. Alor-Hernández, J. Sánchez-Cervantes, A. Rodríguez-González, R. Valencia-García, Eds. Current Trends in Semantic Web Technologies: Theory and Practice, Vol. 815, 2019, pp. 3-24.10.1007/978-3-030-06149-4_1Search in Google Scholar

9. Dwivedi, S., A. Kumar. Development of University Ontology for aSPOCMS. – Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, Vol. 5, August 2013, No 3, pp. 213-221.10.4304/jetwi.5.3.213-221Search in Google Scholar

10. Forbes, D., P. Wongthongtham, J. Singh, S. Thompson. Ontology Supported Assistive Communications in Healthcare. – Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 34, 2014, pp. 297-322.10.17705/1CAIS.03414Search in Google Scholar

11. The Gene Ontology Consortium. The Gene Ontology Resource: 20 Years and Still GOing Strong. – In: Nucleic Acids Res., 2018. DOI:10.1093/nar/gky1055.10.1093/nar/gky1055632394530395331Search in Google Scholar

12. Yan, H., F. Zhang, B. Liu. Granular Computing Based Ontology Learning Model and Its Applications. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 16, 2016, No 4, pp. 29-44.Search in Google Scholar

13. Kontopoulos, E., G. Martinopoulos, D. Lazarou, N. Bassiliades. An Ontology-Based Decision Support Tool for Optimizing Domestic Solar Hot Water System Selection. – Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 112, 2016, No 5, pp. 4636-4646.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.088Search in Google Scholar

14. Monnin, P., C. Jonquet, J. Legrand, A. Napoli. PGxO: A Very Lite Ontology to Reconcile Pharmacogenomic Knowledge Units. – PeerJ Preprints 5:e3140v1., 2017. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3140v110.7287/peerj.preprints.3140v1Search in Google Scholar

15. Brüggemann, S. Rule Mining for Automatic Ontology Based Data Cleaning. – In: Y. Zhang, G. Yu, E. Bertino, U. Xu, Eds. APWeb 2008. 4976, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 2008, pp. 522-527. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78849-2_5210.1007/978-3-540-78849-2_52Search in Google Scholar

16. Buranarach, M., T. Supnithi, Y. Thein, T. Ruangrajitpakorn, T. Rattanasawad, K. Wongpatikaseree, A. O. Lim, Y. Tan, A. Assawamakin. OAM: An Ontology Application Management Framework for Simplifying Ontology-Based Semantic Web Application Development. – International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Vol. 26, 2016, No 1, pp. 115-145.10.1142/S0218194016500066Search in Google Scholar

17. Eine, B., M. Jurisch, W. Quint. Ontology-Based Big Data Management. – Systems, Vol. 5, 2017, No 45.10.3390/systems5030045Search in Google Scholar

18. Michael, A., R. Kothandaraman, K. Kaliyan. Providing Ontology-Based Access Control for Cloud Data by Exploiting. – International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, Vol. 12, 2019, No 3, pp. 280-291. DOI:10.22266/ijies2019.0630.27.10.22266/ijies2019.0630.27Search in Google Scholar

19. EDM Council. The Financial Industry Business Ontology (FIBO). 2008. Retrieved Sptember 2019. https://spec.edmcouncil.org/fibo/index.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

20. Wisnosky, D. The FIBO Leadership Team. FIBO™ Build, Test, Deploy and Maintain Methodology. 30 September 2017. Retrieved 30 September 2019, from EDM Council. https://spec.edmcouncil.org/fibo/doc/20170930_FIBO_BTDM.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

21. Abdelghany, A. S., N. R. Darwish, H. A. Hefni. An Agile Methodology for Ontology Development. – International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, Vol. 12, 2019, No 2, pp. 170-181. DOI:10.22266/ijies2019.0430.17.10.22266/ijies2019.0430.17Search in Google Scholar

22. Axelsson, J., E. Papatheocharous, J. Nyfjord, M. Törngren. Notes on Agile and Safety-Critical Development. – ASM SIGSOFT Software Engeneering, Vol. 41, March 2016, No 2, pp. 23-26.10.1145/2894784.2894796Search in Google Scholar

23. The Gene Ontology Consortium (n.d.). Gene Ontology Resource. Retrieved September 2019. http://geneontology.org/Search in Google Scholar

24. Fox, M., J. Chionglo, F. Fadel (n.d.). TOVE Project. Retrieved September 2019. http://www.eil.utoronto.ca/projects/tove-project/Search in Google Scholar

25. Bennett, M. Providing Conceptual Disambiguation for Terms in Reusable Ontologies: A Case Study from FIBO. – In: 6th International Workshop on Ontologies and Conceptual Modeling (Onto.Com), 2205. Cape Town, South Africa, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

26. Zaino, J. Banking on FIBO: Financial Institutions Turn to Semantic Standard. 2016. Retrieved September 2019. https://www.dataversity.net/banking-fibo-financial-institutions-turn-standard-value-compliance/Search in Google Scholar

27. ElHassouni, J., A. ElQadi, M. Bazzi, M. ElHaziti. Modeling with Ontologies Design Patterns: Credit Scorecard as a Case Study. – Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vol. 17, January 2020, No 1, pp. 429-439. DOI:10.11591/ijeecs.v17.i1.10.11591/ijeecs.v17.i1Search in Google Scholar

28. Gangemi, A., V. Presutti. Ontology Design Patterns. – In: S. Staab, R. Studer, Eds. Handbook on Ontologies. International Handbooks on Information Systems. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 2009, pp. 221-243.10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_10Search in Google Scholar

29. Ferrario, R. Who Cares about Axiomatization? Representation, Invariance, and Formal Ontologies, Epistemologia. – Epistemologia, Vol. 2, 2006, pp. 323-342. http://www.cnr.it/prodotto/i/69465Search in Google Scholar

30. Suppose, P. Heuristics and the Axiomatic Method. – Models and Methods in the Philosophy of Science. – Selected Essays, Vol. 226, pp. 55-65. Preprint. – In: Synthese Library. Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2300-8_510.1007/978-94-017-2300-8_5Search in Google Scholar

31. Krötzsch, M., F. Simancik, I. Horrocks. A Description Logic Primer. ArxIV; Preprint: 2012. arXiv CoRR abs/1201.4089.Search in Google Scholar

32. Sarker, M., A. Krisnadhi, P. Hitzler. OWLAx: A Protégé Plugin to Support Ontology Axiomatization through Diagramming. – In: T. Kawamura, H. Paulheim, Eds. Proceedings of the ISWC 2016 Posters & Demonstrations Track Co-Located with 15th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC’16), Kobe, Japan, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

33. PovedaVillalón, M. (n.d.). OOPS! (OntOlogy Pitfall Scanner!). Retrieved September 2019. http://oops.linkeddata.esSearch in Google Scholar

34. PovedaVillalón, M. Ontology Evaluation: A Pitfall-Based Approach to Ontology Diagnosis. Phd Thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

35. Parsia, B., N. Matentzoglu, R. Gonçalves, B. Glimm, A. Steigmiller. The OWL Reasoner Evaluation (ORE) 2015 Competition. – Automated Reasoning, 2015. DOI:10.1007/s10817-017-9406-8.10.1007/s10817-017-9406-8604426530069067Search in Google Scholar

36. Glimm, B., I. Horrocks, B. Motik, G. Stoilos, Z. Wang. HermiT: An OWL 2 Reasoner. – Automated Reasoning, 2014, pp. 1-25. DOI:10.1007/s10817-014-9305-1.10.1007/s10817-014-9305-1Search in Google Scholar

37. Horridge, M., S. Bechhofer. The OWL API: A Java API for OWL. – Semantic Web Journal, Vol. 2, 2011, No 1, pp. 11-21.10.3233/SW-2011-0025Search in Google Scholar

38. Blomqvist, E., A. SeilSepour, V. Presutti. Ontology Testing – Methodology and Tool. – In: K. E. Management, Ed. Proc. of 18th International Conference EKAW 2012, Galway, Irland. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, October 2012, pp. 216-226.10.1007/978-3-642-33876-2_20Search in Google Scholar

39. The Apache Software Foundation. Apache Jena – ARQ – A SPARQL Processor for Jena. 2017, Retrieved September 2019. http://jena.apache.org/documentation/querySearch in Google Scholar