1. bookVolumen 12 (2021): Heft 2 (December 2021)
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
1847-9375
Erstveröffentlichung
19 Sep 2012
Erscheinungsweise
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
access type Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Entrepreneurial Orientation, Strategic Networking, and Croatian SMEs Performance: A Configurational Approach

Online veröffentlicht: 10 Apr 2022
Volumen & Heft: Volumen 12 (2021) - Heft 2 (December 2021)
Seitenbereich: 236 - 252
Eingereicht: 02 Nov 2021
Akzeptiert: 21 Nov 2021
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
1847-9375
Erstveröffentlichung
19 Sep 2012
Erscheinungsweise
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
Abstract

Background: Many studies on entrepreneurship indicate an affirmative entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and small firm performance interrelationship. However, the empirical results are inconclusive, especially when firms face certain contingencies.

Objectives: Strategic networking and environmental dynamism are important to SMEs’ performance; therefore, the goal of this study is to apply a configurational approach for developing a model that promotes the roles of strategic networking and environmental dynamism as moderating variables in the EO-performance relationship.

Methods/Approach: For determining which model fits the data best, a moderated linear regression analysis was used as an analytical method to test the proposed hypotheses. Specifically, configurational, contingency and universal models were examined.

Results: Results reveal that a configurational model provides a statistically better explanation of variance in performance compared to both contingency and universal models.

Conclusions: By adding strategic networking to the EO-performance relationship, our study helps explain why some firms, although restrained with internal resources, can still achieve entrepreneurial projects since required resources can be acquired from external network partners. Limitations of this study encompass the sample size, the use of a subjective scale, questioning of only one representative of the firm, and the short-term aspect of the study.

JEL Classification

1. Adler, P. S., Kwon, S. (2002), “Social capital: Prospects for a new concept”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 17-40.10.5465/amr.2002.5922314 Search in Google Scholar

2. Ağca, V., Topal, Y., Kaya, H. (2012), “Linking intrapreneurship activities to multidimensional firm performance in Turkish manufacturing firms: An empirical study”, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 15-33.10.1007/s11365-009-0132-5 Search in Google Scholar

3. Anderson, B. S., Kreiser, P. M., Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., Eshima, Y. (2015), “Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial orientation”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 36 No. 10, pp. 1579-1596.10.1002/smj.2298 Search in Google Scholar

4. Anseel, F., Lievens, F. (2007), “The Relationship between Uncertainty and Desire for Feedback: A Test of Competing Hypotheses”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 37 No. 5, pp. 1007-1040.10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00197.x Search in Google Scholar

5. Baker, D. D., Cullen, J. B. (1993), “Administrative reorganization and configurational context: the contingent effects of age, size, and change in size”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36 No. 6, pp. 1251-1277. Search in Google Scholar

6. Baum, J. A. C., Calabrese, T., Silverman, B. S. (2000), “Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 267-294.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<267::AID-SMJ89>3.0.CO;2-8 Search in Google Scholar

7. Bauweraerts, J. (2019), “Entrepreneurial orientation and performance in private family firms: A configurational model”, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 418-431.10.1002/cjas.1513 Search in Google Scholar

8. Brown, S. L., Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995), “Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 343-378.10.2307/258850 Search in Google Scholar

9. Covin, J. G., Slevin, D. P. (1989), “Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 75-87.10.1002/smj.4250100107 Search in Google Scholar

10. Deng, X., Gao, B., Li, G. (2019), “The Effects of Dynamic Work Environments on Entrepreneurs’ Humble Leader Behaviors: Based on Uncertainty Reduction Theory”, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 10, pp. 1-10.10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02732 Search in Google Scholar

11. Dess, G. G., Beard, D. W. (1984), “Dimensions of organizational task environments”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 52-73.10.2307/2393080 Search in Google Scholar

12. Dess, G. G., Lumpkin, G. T., Covin, J. G. (1997), “Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: Tests of contingency and configurational models”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18 No. 9, pp. 677-695.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199710)18:9<677::AID-SMJ905>3.0.CO;2-Q Search in Google Scholar

13. Frank, H., Kessler, A., Fink, M. (2010), “Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance - a replication study”, Schmalenbach business review, Vol. 62 No. 2, pp. 175-198.10.1007/BF03396804 Search in Google Scholar

14. Guth, W. D., Ginsberg, A. (1990), “Guest editors’ introduction: Corporate entrepreneurship”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 11, pp. 5-15. Search in Google Scholar

15. Hamel, G. (2000), Leading the revolution, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. Search in Google Scholar

16. Hart, S. L. (1992), “An integrative framework for strategy-making processes”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 327-351.10.5465/amr.1992.4279547 Search in Google Scholar

17. Hughes, M., Morgan, R. E. (2007), “Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance at the embryonic stage of firm growth”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 36 No. 5, pp. 651-661.10.1016/j.indmarman.2006.04.003 Search in Google Scholar

18. Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G., Kuratko, D. F. (2009), “Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 19-46.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00279.x Search in Google Scholar

19. Jiang, X., Liu, H., Fey, C., Jiang, F. (2018), “Entrepreneurial orientation, network resource acquisition, and firm performance: A network approach”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 87, pp. 46-57.10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.021 Search in Google Scholar

20. Jones, O., Macpherson, A. (2006), “Inter-organizational learning and strategic renewal in SMEs: Extending the 4I framework”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 155-175.10.1016/j.lrp.2005.02.012 Search in Google Scholar

21. Ketchen D. J., Thomas, J. B., Snow, C. C. (1993), “Organizational configurations and performance: a comparison of theoretical approaches”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36 No. 6, pp. 1278-1313.10.5465/256812 Search in Google Scholar

22. Kohtamäki, M., Heimonen, J., Parida, V. (2019), “The nonlinear relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and sales growth: The moderating effects of slack resources and absorptive capacity”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 100, pp. 100-110.10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.018 Search in Google Scholar

23. Kollman, T., Stockmann, C. (2014), “Filling the entrepreneurial orientation – Performance gap: The mediating effects of exploratory and exploitative innovations”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 38 No. 5, pp. 1001-1026.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00530.x Search in Google Scholar

24. Kreiser, P. M., Davis, J. (2010), “Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The unique impact of innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk-taking”, Journal of Small Business Entrepreneurship, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 39-51.10.1080/08276331.2010.10593472 Search in Google Scholar

25. Lee, C., Lee, K., Pennings, J. M. (2001), “Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technologybased ventures”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22 No. 6-7, pp. 615-640.10.1002/smj.181 Search in Google Scholar

26. Lee, T., Chu, W. (2013), “How entrepreneurial orientation, environmental dynamism, and resource rareness influence firm performance”, Journal of Management & Organization, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 167-187.10.1017/jmo.2013.33 Search in Google Scholar

27. Li, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, H. (2011), “Co-opetition, distributor’s entrepreneurial orientation and manufacturer’s knowledge acquisition: Evidence from China”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 29 No. 1-2, pp. 128-142.10.1016/j.jom.2010.07.006 Search in Google Scholar

28. Lumpkin, G. T., Dess, G. G. (1996), “Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 135-172.10.2307/258632 Search in Google Scholar

29. Lumpkin, G. T., Dess, G. G. (2001), “Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 429-451.10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00048-3 Search in Google Scholar

30. Lumpkin, G. T., Martin, W. L., Sloat, C. B. (2001), “The role of entrepreneurial orientation in the performance of family firms in dynamic and hostile environments”, paper presented at the Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Glasgow, Scotland. Search in Google Scholar

31. March, J. G. (1991), “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning”, Organization Science, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 71-87.10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 Search in Google Scholar

32. March, J. G., Simon, H. (1963), Organizations, Wiley, New York, NY. Search in Google Scholar

33. Martinez-Conesa, I., Soto-Acosta, P., Carayannis, E. G. (2017), “On the path towards open innovation: Assessing the role of knowledge management capability and environmental dynamism in SMEs”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 553-570.10.1108/JKM-09-2016-0403 Search in Google Scholar

34. McGrath, R. G. (2010), “Business models: A discovery driven approach”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 247-261.10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.005 Search in Google Scholar

35. Meyer, A. D., Tsui, A. S., Hinings, C. R. (1993), “Configurational approaches to organizational analysis”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36 No. 6, pp. 1175-1195. Search in Google Scholar

36. Miller, D. (1983), “The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms”, Management Science, Vol. 29 No. 7, pp. 770-791.10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770 Search in Google Scholar

37. Miller, D. (1987), “Strategy Making and Structure: Analysis and Implications for Performance”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 7-32. Search in Google Scholar

38. Miller, D. (1988), “Relating Porter’s business strategies to environment and structure: Analysis and performance implications”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 280-308. Search in Google Scholar

39. Miller, D. (1990), “Organizational configurations: Cohesion, change, and prediction”, Human Relations, Vol. 43 No. 8, pp. 771-790.10.1177/001872679004300805 Search in Google Scholar

40. Miller, D. (1996), “Configurations revisited”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17 No. 7, pp. 505-512.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199607)17:7<505::AID-SMJ852>3.0.CO;2-I Search in Google Scholar

41. Miller, D., Friesen, P. H. (1978), “Archetypes of strategy formulation”, Management Science, Vol. 24 No. 9, pp. 921-933.10.1287/mnsc.24.9.921 Search in Google Scholar

42. Moreno, A. M., Casillas, J. C. (2008), “Entrepreneurial orientation and growth of SMEs: A causal model”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 507-528.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00238.x Search in Google Scholar

43. Morgan, R. E., Strong, C. A. (2003), “Business performance and dimensions of strategic orientation”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 56 No. 3, pp. 163-176.10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00218-1 Search in Google Scholar

44. Mu, J., Thomas, E., Peng, G., Di Benedetto, A. (2017), “Strategic orientation and new product development performance: The role of networking capability and networking ability”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 64, pp. 187-201.10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.09.007 Search in Google Scholar

45. Obeng, B.A. (2018), “Strategic networking and small firm growth in an emerging economy”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 43-66.10.1108/JSBED-01-2018-0035 Search in Google Scholar

46. Parida, V., Westerberg, M., Ylinenpää, H., Roininen, S. (2010), “Exploring the effects of network configurations on entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: an empirical study of new ventures and small firms”, Annals of Innovation & Entrepreneurship, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 1-13.10.3402/aie.v1i1.5657 Search in Google Scholar

47. Pateli, A. G., Giaglis, G. M. (2005), “Technology innovation-induced business model change: A contingency approach”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 167-183.10.1108/09534810510589589 Search in Google Scholar

48. Schneider, S., Spieth, P. (2013), “Business model innovation: Towards an integrated future research agenda”, International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 1-34.10.1142/S136391961340001X Search in Google Scholar

49. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934), The theory of economic development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Search in Google Scholar

50. Smart, D. T., Conant, J. S. (1994), “Entrepreneurial orientation, distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance”, Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 28-38.10.19030/jabr.v10i3.5921 Search in Google Scholar

51. Soto-Acosta, P., Popa, S., Palacios-Marque’s, D. (2016), “E-business, organizational innovation and firm performance in manufacturing SMEs: an empirical study in Spain”, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 885-904.10.3846/20294913.2015.1074126 Search in Google Scholar

52. Teng, B. S. (2007), “Corporate entrepreneurship activities through strategic alliances: A resource-based approach toward competitive advantages”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 44 No. 1, pp. 119-142.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00645.x Search in Google Scholar

53. Venkatraman, N., Ramanujam, V. (1986), “Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A Comparison of approaches”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 801-814.10.2307/258398 Search in Google Scholar

54. Waldner, F., Poetz, M. K., Grimpe, C., Eurich, M. (2015), “Antecedents and consequences of business model innovation: The role of industry structure”, in BadenFuller, C., Mangematin, V. (Eds.), Advances in strategic management: Vol. 33, Business models and modelling, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 347-386.10.1108/S0742-332220150000033009 Search in Google Scholar

55. Wales, W. J., Covin, J. G., Monsen, E. (2020), “Entrepreneurial orientation: The necessity of the multilevel conceptualization”, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, Vol. 14, pp. 639-660.10.1002/sej.1344 Search in Google Scholar

56. Wales, W. J., Patel, P. C., Lumpkin, G. T. (2013), “In pursuit of greatness: CEO narcissism, entrepreneurial orientation, and firm performance variance”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 50 No. 6, pp. 1041-1069.10.1111/joms.12034 Search in Google Scholar

57. Wiklund, J. (1999), “The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 37-48.10.1177/104225879902400103 Search in Google Scholar

58. Wiklund, J., Shepherd, D. (2003), “Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24 No. 13, pp. 1307-1314.10.1002/smj.360 Search in Google Scholar

59. Wiklund, J., Shepherd, D. (2005), “Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 71-91.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.01.001 Search in Google Scholar

60. Zahra, S. A., Covin, J. G. (1995), “Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 43-58.10.1016/0883-9026(94)00004-E Search in Google Scholar

61. Zahra, S., (1991), “Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: an explorative study”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 259-285.10.1016/0883-9026(91)90019-A Search in Google Scholar

62. Zahra, S.A. (1993), “Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance: a taxonomic approach”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 319-340.10.1016/0883-9026(93)90003-N Search in Google Scholar

63. Zajac, E. J., Kraatz, M. S., Bresser, R. K. F. (2000), “Modeling the Dynamic of Strategic Fit: A Normative Approach to Strategic Change”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 429-453.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200004)21:4<429::AID-SMJ81>3.0.CO;2-# Search in Google Scholar

Empfohlene Artikel von Trend MD

Planen Sie Ihre Fernkonferenz mit Scienceendo