1. bookVolumen 12 (2021): Heft 2 (December 2021)
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
1847-9375
Erstveröffentlichung
19 Sep 2012
Erscheinungsweise
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
access type Uneingeschränkter Zugang

The Co-innovation Bingo: An Object-Oriented Networking Mechanism to Foster Coupled Open Business Innovation

Online veröffentlicht: 10 Apr 2022
Volumen & Heft: Volumen 12 (2021) - Heft 2 (December 2021)
Seitenbereich: 144 - 159
Eingereicht: 15 Jan 2021
Akzeptiert: 11 Jul 2021
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
1847-9375
Erstveröffentlichung
19 Sep 2012
Erscheinungsweise
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
Abstract

Background: A firm’s cooperative strategies are a fundamental issue in the search for business growth avenues, but a system that eases the emergence of coupled open innovation appears to be missing.

Objectives: This paper describes a business networking tool to foster coupled open innovation emergence.

Methods/Approach: We adopted a methodology based on design science comparable to grounded theory because solutions emerged by testing a design artefact with companies.

Results: We designed and tested an artefact designed as a game to encourage participants to meet as many partners as possible. It is based on collaborative innovation mechanisms and gets inspiration from fields such as organization design, service design, and prospective design. The proposed artefact comes as prescriptive rules that support managers’ open innovation opportunity elicitation.

Conclusions: From a practical point of view, we contribute by helping companies find emergent open innovation opportunities. From a theoretical point of view, this artefact is part of an emergent theory of object-oriented coupled open innovation mechanisms.

JEL Classification

1. BNI (2020) Home Page. Available at: https://www.bni.swiss Search in Google Scholar

2. Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., Heaton, S., Teece, D.J. (2019) “Strategic Management of Open Innovation: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective”. California Management Review 62(1), pp. 77-9410.1177/0008125619885150 Search in Google Scholar

3. Bunchball, Inc. (2010) “Gamification 101: An Introduction to the Use of Game Dynamics to Influence Behavior”. White paper Search in Google Scholar

4. Castaldi, C., Faber, J., & Kishna, M. (2010) “Co-innovation by KIBS in environmental services: a resource-based view”. (ECIS working paper series; Vol. 201005). Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. Search in Google Scholar

5. Clayton, P., Davies, P. (2006) “The Re-Emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion”. Oxford University Press Search in Google Scholar

6. Chauvet, V. et al. (2010) « Management et réseaux sociaux. Bilan et perspectives de recherche ». Revue Française de Gestion n°202, pp. 79-9610.3166/rfg.202.79-96 Search in Google Scholar

7. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting From Technology. Harvard Business School Press. Search in Google Scholar

8. Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (2000) « A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances”. Journal of Management, 26(1), 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063000260010510.1177/014920630002600105 Search in Google Scholar

9. Davis, M.S., (1971) “That’s interesting: Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology”. Philosophy of the social sciences 1(4), p. 30910.1177/004839317100100211 Search in Google Scholar

10. Deci E., Ryan R. (1985) Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior, ser. Perspectives in social psychology. Plenum10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 Search in Google Scholar

11. Deterding S., Dixon D., Khaled R., Nacke L., (2011a) Gamification: Toward a definition, CHI 2011 gamification workshop Search in Google Scholar

12. Deterding S., Dixon D., Khaled R., Nacke L., (2011b) From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”, Mindtrek10.1145/2181037.2181040 Search in Google Scholar

13. Flores, M., Golob, M., Maklin, D., & Tucci, C. (2019) “Speeding-Up Innovation with Business Hackathons”. Conference Proceedings of the Academy for Design Innovation Management, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.33114/adim.2019.11.26310.33114/adim.2019.11.263 Search in Google Scholar

14. Gallouj, F. & Weinstein, O. (1997) “Innovation in services”, Research Policy, 26: 537-55610.1016/S0048-7333(97)00030-9 Search in Google Scholar

15. Gassmann, O. & Enkel, E. (2004) “Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes”. University of St.Gallen. 6. Search in Google Scholar

16. Gregor, S., & Jones, D. (2007) “The anatomy of a design theory”. Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 8(5), 312–335.10.17705/1jais.00129 Search in Google Scholar

17. Grèzes, V., Bonazzi, R. (2020) “Towards a Theory of Collaborative Innovation: The Emergence of the Three Doors Model”. World Open Innovation Conference WOIC, Berkeley, USA. Search in Google Scholar

18. Gribbons, B. & Herman, J. (1997) “True and quasi-experimental designs”. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation,5(14). Available online: http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=5&n=14 Search in Google Scholar

19. Groh, F. (2012) “Gamification: State of the Art Definition and Utilization”, in the Proceedings of the 4th Seminar on Research Trends in Media Informatics Search in Google Scholar

20. Impact Hub (2019) Impact report. Available at: http://www.bepartofthechange.mww.se/assets/report.pdf Search in Google Scholar

21. Impact Hub (2020) Home Page. Available at: https://impacthub.net/ Search in Google Scholar

22. M&BD Consulting (2016) Rapport de l’étude “Capacité à innover des PME et ETI romandes”. Lausanne Search in Google Scholar

23. Nidumolu, R., Ellison, J., Whalen, J., Billman, E. (2014) “The collaboration imperative”. Harv Bus Rev. 92(4), pp. 76-132. Search in Google Scholar

24. OECD/Eurostat (2018) “Oslo Manual 2018. Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation”. 4th Edition, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD Publishing, Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en10.1787/9789264304604-en Search in Google Scholar

25. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y. (2010) “Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers.” Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Search in Google Scholar

26. Rothwell, R. (1994). “Towards the Fifth-generation Innovation Process”. International Marketing Review, Vol. 11 n. 1, pp. 7-3110.1108/02651339410057491 Search in Google Scholar

27. Seco (2020) Concept RIS 2020 +. Bern Search in Google Scholar

28. Van Aken, J. E. (2005) “Management Research as a Design Science: Articulating the Research Products of Mode 2 Knowledge Production in Management”. British Journal of Management, Vol. 16, pp. 19–3610.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00437.x Search in Google Scholar

29. Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F. (2008) “Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution”. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 36, 1–10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0069-610.1007/s11747-007-0069-6 Search in Google Scholar

30. World Economic Forum (2015) “Collaborative Innovation Transforming Business, Driving Growth”. (August), 44. Available at http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Collaborative_Innovation_report_2015.pdf Search in Google Scholar

31. Zeng, S.X., Xie, X.M., Tam, C.M. (2010) “Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs”. Technovation 30, pp. 181–19410.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.003 Search in Google Scholar

Empfohlene Artikel von Trend MD

Planen Sie Ihre Fernkonferenz mit Scienceendo