The Effects of Expenditures for Labour Market Policy on Unemployment Rate

1. Bassanini, A., Duval. R. (2009), “Unemployment, institutions and reform complementarities: reassessing the aggregate evidence for OECD countries”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 40-59.10.1093/oxrep/grp004Search in Google Scholar

2. Baumgartner, H. J., Caliendo, M. (2008), “Turning unemployment into self-employment: effectiveness of two start-up programmes”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 70, No. 3, pp. 347-373.10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00505.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Belot, M., Van Ours. J. C. (2004), “Does the recent success of some OECD countries in lowering their unemployment rates lie in the clever design of their labour market reforms?”, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 621-642.10.1093/oep/gpf057Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. Caliendo, M., Schmidl, R. (2015), “Youth unemployment and active labor market policies in Europe”, IZA Journal of Labor Policy, Vol. 5, No. 1.10.1186/s40173-016-0057-xSearch in Google Scholar

5. Card, D., Kluve, J., Weber, A. (2015), “What works? A meta analysis of recent active labour market program evaluations”, NBER working paper, No. 21431, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, July 2015, revised April 2017.Search in Google Scholar

6. Dehejia, R. H. (2013), “The porous dialectic: experimental and non-experimental methods in development economics”, WIDER Working Paper 011.Search in Google Scholar

7. Eurostat (2013). Labour market policy statistics. Methodology 2013, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.Search in Google Scholar

8. Eurostat (2017), “Eurostat statistics explained. Unemployment statistics”, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Unemployment_statistics (20 December 2017).Search in Google Scholar

9. Frölich, M., Lechner, M. (2015), “Combining matching and nonparametric instrumental variable estimation: theory and an application to the evaluation of active labour market policies”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 718-738.10.1002/jae.2417Search in Google Scholar

10. Gertler, J. P., Martinez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L. B., Vermeersch, C. M. J. (2016). Impact Evaluation in Practice, The World Bank, Washington.10.1596/978-1-4648-0779-4Search in Google Scholar

11. Gonzalez Carreras, F. J., Kirchner Sala, L., Speckesser, S. (2015),”The effectiveness of policies to combat youth unemployment”, STYLE Working Papers, WP3.2. CROME, University of Brighton, Brighton.Search in Google Scholar

12. Hansen, B., Rosenbaum, P. R., Small, D. (2014), “Clustered treatment assignments and sensitivity to unmeasured biases in observational studies”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 109, No. 505, pp. 133-144.10.1080/01621459.2013.863157Search in Google Scholar

13. Heckman, J. J., Pinto, R. (2015), “Causal analysis after Haavelmo”, Econometric Theory, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 115-151.10.1017/S026646661400022XSearch in Google Scholar

14. Huber, M., Lechner, M., Wunsch, C. (2013), “The performance of estimators based on the propensity score”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 175, No. 1, pp. 1-21.10.1016/j.jeconom.2012.11.006Search in Google Scholar

15. Južnik Rotar, L. (2012), “How effective is the Slovenian institutional training program in improving youth's chances of reemployment?”, Eastern European Economics, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 94-106.10.2753/EEE0012-8775500305Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16. Južnik Rotar, L. (2017), “Labour market policy and association with productivity”, in Yongqiang, L., Hunjet, A., Roncevic, A. (Eds), Economic and social development, Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency, Varazdin, Croatia; City of Prague; Faculty of Management University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland; University North, Koprivnica, Croatia, pp. 85-91.Search in Google Scholar

17. Kennedy, P. (2008). A guide to econometrics, Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Malden.Search in Google Scholar

18. Khandker, S. R., Koolwal, G. B., Samad, H. A. (2010). Handbook on Impact Evaluation. Quantitative Methods and Practices, World Bank, Washington.Search in Google Scholar

19. Kluve, J. (2010), “The effectiveness of European active labor market programs”, Labour Economics, Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 904-918.10.1016/j.labeco.2010.02.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20. Martin, J. P. (2014). Activation and active labour market policies in OECD countries: stylized facts and evidence on their effectiveness, University College Dublin, Geary Institute, Dublin.10.1186/s40173-015-0032-ySearch in Google Scholar

21. Murtin, F., De Serres, A. (2013a), “How do labour market institutions affect the exit rate out of unemployment?”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, OECD Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

22. Murtin, F., De Serres, A., Hijzen, A. (2013b), “The ins and outs of unemployment”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, OECD Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

23. Rosenbaum, P., Rubin, D. B. (1983), “The central role of propensity score in observational studies for causal effects”, Biometrika, Vol. 70, No. 1, pp. 41-55.10.1093/biomet/70.1.41Search in Google Scholar

24. Stock, J. H., Watson, M. W. (2015). Introduction to econometrics, Pearson, Harlow.Search in Google Scholar

25. Van den Berg, G. J., Van der Klaauw, B. (2015), “Structural empirical evaluation of job search monitoring”, IFAU Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy Working Paper 16.Search in Google Scholar

26. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross-Section and Panel Data, MIT Press, Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar