The Possibility of Applying Artificial Intelligence in the Delivery of Justice by Courts

1 Andenæs, Mads Tønnesson, Burkhard Hess and Paul Oberhammer. Enforcement agency practice in Europe. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2005. Search in Google Scholar

2 Beliūnienė, Lina, et al. “Galimybės siaurinti teismo funkcijas administracinių teisės pažeidimų procese.” Vilnius: Lietuvos teisės institutas, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

3 Bell, Felicity, et al. AI Decision-Making and the Courts: A Guide for Judges, Tribunal Members and Court Administrators. Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration, 2023 // https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4162985 Search in Google Scholar

4 Beriain, Iñigo De Miguel. “Does the use of risk assessments in sentences respect the right to due process? A critical analysis of the Wisconsin v. Loomis ruling.” Law, Probability and Risk 17, 1 (2018): 45–53 // https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgy001 Search in Google Scholar

5 Cavallini, Daniela. State Liability for Judicial Wrongs: Impact of Rulings of the European Court of Justice and Debate in Italy in The Culture of Judicial Independence in a Globalised World. Brill | Nijhoff, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

6 Chroust, Anton-Hermann. “The Function of Law and Justice in the Ancient World and the Middle Ages.” Journal of the History of Ideas 7, 3 (1946): 298–320 // https://doi.org/10.2307/2707403 Search in Google Scholar

7 Cui, Yadong. Artificial Intelligence and Judicial Modernization. Singapore: Springer, 2020 // https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9880-4 Search in Google Scholar

8 Freeman, Michael D. A. and Dennis Lloyd Lloyd of Hampstead. Lloyd’s Introduction to Jurisprudence. 9 ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

9 Kasap, Gizem Halis. “Can Artificial Intelligence (,AI‘) Replace Human Arbitrators? Technological Concerns and Legal Implications.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2 (2021): 209–254 // https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/jdisres2021&i=226 Search in Google Scholar

10 Lazar, Seth, and Jake Stone. “On the Site of Predictive Justice.” Noûs, (2024) // https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12477 Search in Google Scholar

11 Dahl, Matthew, et al. Large Legal Fictions: Profiling Legal Hallucinations in Large Language Models. (2024) arxIV:2401.01301 // https://arxiv.org/html/2401.01301v1 Search in Google Scholar

12 Niesel, Zoe. “Machine Learning and the New Civil Procedure.” Smu Law Review 73 (s. a.). Search in Google Scholar

13 Nelson, Gregory S. “Bias in Artificial Intelligence.” North Carolina Medical Journal 80 (2019): 4 // https://ncmedicaljournal.com/article/55108.pdf Search in Google Scholar

14 Olmo Rodriguez, Pablo J. “Artificial Intelligence Law: Applications, Risks & Opportunities.” Revista Juridica Universidad de Puerto Rico 90, 3 (2021): 701–720 // https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/rjupurco90&i=735 Search in Google Scholar

15 Posner, Richard A. “The Role of the Judge in the Twenty-First Century.” Boston University law review 86 (s. a.). Search in Google Scholar

16 Pound, Roscoe. “Justice According to Law.” Columbia Law Review 13, 8 (1913): 696–713 // https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/clr13&i=740 Search in Google Scholar

17 Russell, Stuart J., Peter Norvig, Ernest Davis. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 3rd ed. Prentice Hall Series in Artificial Intelligence. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2010. Search in Google Scholar

18 Shields, Allison C. “Emotional Intelligence versus Artificial Intelligence Frontlines: Simple Steps.” Law Practice 45, 4 (2019): 14–15 // https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/lwpra45&i=257 Search in Google Scholar

19 Surden, Harry. “Artificial Intelligence and Law: An Overview.” Rochester, NY, 2019 // https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3411869 Search in Google Scholar

20 Tamanaha, B. Z. “Law as a Means to an End.” Cambridge University Press, 2006. In Michael D. A. Freeman, Lloyd’s Introduction to Jurisprudence. 9 ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

21 Xu, Zichun. “Human Judges in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: Challenges and Opportunities.” Applied Artificial Intelligence 36, 1 (2022): 2013652 // https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2021.2013652 Search in Google Scholar

1 Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe. Considerations On The Legal Aspects Of Artificial Intelligence (2020) // https://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/speciality_distribution/public/documents/IT_LAW/ITL_Guides_recommendations/EN_ITL_20200220_CCBE-considerations-on-the-Legal-Aspects-of-AI.pdf Search in Google Scholar

2 Denisov v. Ukraine. European Court of Human Rights [GC], 2018, Application No. 76639/11. Search in Google Scholar

3 European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice. 2022–2025 CEPEJ Action plan: “Digitalisation for a better justice” Adopted at the 37th CEPEJ plenary meeting Strasbourg and online. (2021) // https://rm.coe.int/cepej-2021-12-encepej-action-plan-2022-2025-digitalisation-justice/1680a4cf2c Search in Google Scholar

4 European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice. European Ethical Charter on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems and their environment. (2018) // https://rm.coe.int/ethical-charter-en-for-publication-4-december-2018/16808f699c Search in Google Scholar

5 European Commision. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending certain union legislative acts. (2021), COM/2021/206 // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52021PC0206 Search in Google Scholar

6 European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice. European Ethical Charter on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems and their environment, adopted at the 31st plenary meeting of the CEPEJ. (2018) // https://rm.coe.int/ethical-charter-en-for-publication-4-december-2018/16808f699c Search in Google Scholar

7 European Parliament. Legislative resolution of 13 March 2024 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union Legislative Acts (2024), COM(2021)0206 – C9-0146/2021 – 2021/0106(COD) TA/2024/0138 // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=EP%3AP9_TA%282024%290138 Search in Google Scholar

8 European Parliament. Position on with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2024/of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No. 300/2008, (EU) No. 167/2013, (EU) No. 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act) // https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/seance_pleniere/textes_adoptes/definitif/2024/03-13/0138/P9_TA(2024)0138_EN.pdf Search in Google Scholar

9 European Network of Councils for the Judiciary. Ljubljana Declaration Courts fit for the future. (2023) // https://pgwrk-websitemedia.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/production/pwk-web-encj2017-p/Ljubljana%20declaration%20ADOPTED%2012.06.2023.pdf Search in Google Scholar

10 İlhan v. Turkey. European Court of Human Rights, 2000, Application No. 22277/93. Search in Google Scholar

11 Khanna, B. Predictive Justice: Using Ai For Justice (2021) // https://www.cppr.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/PREDICTIVE-JUSTICE-USING-AI-FOR-JUSTICE-2.pdf Search in Google Scholar

12 Mata v. Avianca Inc. United States District Court. S.D. New York, 2023, 22-CV-1461 (PKC). Search in Google Scholar

13 Nada v. Switzerland. European Court of Human Rights [GC], 2012, Application No. 10593/08. Search in Google Scholar

14 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. (2019) // https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449 Search in Google Scholar

15 Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on adapting non-contractual civil liability rules to artificial intelligence. 2022, COM/2022/496. Search in Google Scholar

16 Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of June 8, 2006. Search in Google Scholar

17 Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of March 15, 2008. Search in Google Scholar

18 Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of November 15, 2013. Search in Google Scholar

19 State v. Klaipėda City Municipality. Supreme Court of Lithuania, 2011, No. 3K-3-207/2011. Search in Google Scholar

20 State v. Loomis. Supreme Court of Wisconsin, 2016, 881 N.W.2d 749. Search in Google Scholar

21 Zhang v. Chen. The Supreme Court of British Columbia, 2024 BCSC 285. Search in Google Scholar