1. bookVolumen 15 (2022): Heft 2 (December 2022)
05 Feb 2009
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Uneingeschränkter Zugang

The Democratic Legitimacy of Constituent Referendum(s) in Constitution-Making Process Within The Scope of Turkish Constituent Referendum Experiences

Online veröffentlicht: 10 Mar 2023
Volumen & Heft: Volumen 15 (2022) - Heft 2 (December 2022)
Seitenbereich: 48 - 76
Eingereicht: 04 Mar 2022
Akzeptiert: 19 Dec 2022
05 Feb 2009
2 Hefte pro Jahr

1. Aldikaçti, Orhan. Anayasa Hukukumuzun Gelişmesi ve 1961 Anayasasi (Development of Constitution Law 1961 Constitution). istanbul: Yenilik Press, 1973.Search in Google Scholar

2. Bagceci (Tacir), Hamide. “Anayasa, Kurucu iktidar Ve Meşruiyet ilişkisi” (Constitution, Founding Authority and Legitimacy Relationship). Journal of Yeditepe University Faculty of Law Vol.17, No. 1 (2020): 339–384.Search in Google Scholar

3. Bagceci, Hamide. Siyasal Katilim Araci Olarak Referandum: Türkiye ve Avrupa Birliği Uygulamalari (Referendum As a Tool For Political Participation: EU and Turkey Practices). istanbul: Oniki Levha Press, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

4. Baker, Lynn A. “Direct Democracy and Discrimination: A Public Choice Perspective.” Chicago-Kent Law Review Vol. 67 (1991): 708–775.Search in Google Scholar

5. Batum, Süheyl. Siyasal Katilma Biçimi Olarak Referendum (Referendum as a Political Participation Method). Unpublished PhD Thesis. istanbul: istanbul University Institute of Social Sciences, 1986.Search in Google Scholar

6. Beigbeder, Yves. “Referendum”: 696–706. In: Heidelberg: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford University Press, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

7. Belko, Marian, and Lubomir Kopecek. “Referendum in theory and practice: the history of the Slovak referendums and their consequences.” Stredoevropske politicke studie 5 (2003): 1–10.Search in Google Scholar

8. Bilir, Faruk. “Anayasa Yapimina Yönelik Değerlendirmeler” (Analyses on Constitution-Making). Gazi University Law Faculty Journal (2008): 551–564.Search in Google Scholar

9. Blount, Justin. “Participation in constitutional design”: 38–57. In: Tom Ginsburg and Rosalind Dixon, eds. Comparative Constitutional Law Participation in Constitutional Design. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

10. Braunstein, Richard. Initiative and Referendum Voting: Governing Through Direct Democracy in the United States. LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

11. Butler, David, and Austin Ranney. “Summing Up”: 221–222. In: David Butler and Austin Ranney, eds., Referendums: A Comparative Study of Practice and Theory. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Policy Research, 1978.Search in Google Scholar

12. Celik, Metin. “Avrupa Birliği’nde Yaşanan Meşruiyet Krizi” (Legitimacy Crisis in the EU). Gazi University School of Economics and Administrative Sciences Journal (2013): 151–190.Search in Google Scholar

13. Crook, Malcolm. “Ma volonte est celle du peuple: Voting in the Plebiscite and Parliamentary Elections During Napoleon’s Hundred Days. April-May 1815.” French Historical Studies 2009, 32 (4): 619-645.10.1215/00161071-2009-011Search in Google Scholar

14. Gözler, Kemal. Kurucu iktidar (Founding Government). Bursa: Ekin Publishing, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

15. Gözler, Kemal. Türk Anayasa Hukuku Dersleri (Turkish Constitution Law Lesson). Bursa: Ekin Publishing, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

16. Gül, Mehmet Şener. Anayasa Hukuku Açisindan Kurucu Referandum (Constituent Referendum with Respect to Constitution Law). Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Ankara: Ankara University, Institute of Social Sciences, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

17. Karakartal, Bener. “Bir Siyasal bir Siyasal Katilma Turu ‘Olarak Referandum ve 1961 Turk Anayasa Referandumu” (Referendum as a Type of Political Participation and 1961-dated Turkish Constitution Referendum). istanbul University Journal of the Faculty of Economics Vol. 38, No.3-4 (2011): 161– 180.Search in Google Scholar

18. Kelsen, Hans. Allegemine Staatslehre, Berlin: Springer, 1925.Search in Google Scholar

19. Kucherenkia, Petr A., Badma V. Sangadzhieva, and Murad C. Velibek. “Legal Nature and Functions of Referendum in Constitutional Law Theory.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education Vol. 11, No. 16 (2016): 8764–8770.Search in Google Scholar

20. Lijpart, Arend. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1984.10.2307/j.ctt1ww3w2tSearch in Google Scholar

21. Lipset, Seymour Martin. Political Man. Mercury Books, 1963.Search in Google Scholar

22. Loughlin, Martin. “On Constituent Power”: 149–224. In: Michael W. Dowdle and Micheal Wilkinson, eds. Constitutionalism Beyond Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

23. Möckli, Silvano. “Direct Democracy in Nine Countries: A Survey.” Paper presented at the conference “Democrazie e referendum”, Societt Italiana di Studi Elettorali, IV. Convengno Internazionale (Prato, October 3-5, 1991): 1– 18 // https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/251611/1/Silvano%20Moeckli%20Direct%2 0Democracy%20in%20Nine%20Countries.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

24. Möckli, Silvano. Direkte Demokratie. Ein intenationaler Vergleich. Bern: Verlag Paul Haupt, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

25. Negri, Antonio. Insurgencies: Constituent Power and the Modern State. University of Minnesota Press, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

26. Norman, Adamson S., and Sarfo Kantanka Kwadwo. “The Role of Referendum: A Case of Ghana.” African Journal of History and Culture Vol.1, No.1 (2009): 1–5.Search in Google Scholar

27. Özbudun, Erun. Türk Anayasa Hukuku, Turkish Constitutional Law. Ankara: Yetkin Press, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

28. Qvortrup, Matt. “Is the Referendum a Constitutional Safeguard?” // http://www.iandrinstitute.org/docs/Qvortrup-Is-the-Referendum-a- Constitutional-Safeguard-IRI.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

29. Qvortrup, Matt. The Referendum and Other Essays on Constitutional Politics. Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing, 2019.10.5040/9781509929320Search in Google Scholar

30. Raz, Joseph. The Morality of Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.Search in Google Scholar

31. Reilly, Shauna. Direct Democracy: A Double-Edged Sword. Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2018.10.1515/9781626377189Search in Google Scholar

32. Rios, Joel Colon. “The Legitimacy of the Juridical Power, Constituent: Democracy and the Limits of Constitutional Reform.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal Vol.48 (2010): 235–237.Search in Google Scholar

33. Rios, Joel Colon. “The Second Dimension of Democracy: The People and Their Constitution.” Baltic Journal of Law and Politics Vol. 2, No. 2 (2009): 1–30.10.2478/v10076-009-0009-5Search in Google Scholar

34. Roznai, Yaniv. Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: A Study of the Nature and Limits of Constitutional Amendment Powers. A thesis submitted to the Department of Law of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

35. Şahbaz, ibrahim. Yari Doğrudan Demokrasi Kurumu Olarak Referandum ve Turkiye (Referendum as a Semi-Direct Democracy Institution and Turkey). Ankara: Yetkin Press, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

36. Saglam, Fazil. Anayasa Hukuku Ders Notlari (Constitutional Law Lecture Notes). Nicosia: Near East University Publications, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

37. Sartori, Gioavanni. Return to Democracy Theory. Trans. Tuncer Karamustafaoglu and Mehmet Turhan. Ankara: Yetkin Press, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

38. Schmitt, Carl. Constitutional Theory. Trans. J. Seitzer. Duke University Press, 2008 [1928].10.2307/j.ctv1131cm8Search in Google Scholar

39. Setela, Maija Talvikki. Theories of Referendum and The Analysis of AgendaSetting. ProQuest Publishing, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

40. Şen, ilker Gökhan. Doğrudan Demokrasi (Direct Democracy). istanbul: Oniki Levha Press, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

41. Sieyès, Emmanuel-Joseph. What is the Third Estate? Trans. M. Blondel. London: Pall Mall Press, 1963 [1789].Search in Google Scholar

42. Sinclair, John. “Legitimate”: 951 In: Collins Cobuild English Dictionary. London: Harper Collins Publication, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

43. “Siyasal Bilgiler Fakultesi Gerekçeli Anayasa Tasarisi, Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakultesi Yayinlari” (Institute of Administration Sciences Views on Justified Constitutional Draft and Election Method). Ankara University. Political Sciences Publications (1960): 9–10.Search in Google Scholar

44. Suksi, Markku. Bringing in the People. London: Martinus Hijnoff Publishers, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

45. Tanör, Bulent. iki Anayasa (Two Constitutions). istanbul: Oniki Levha Press, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

46. Tanör, Bülent. Osmanli Türk Anayasal Gelişmeleri (Ottoman -Turkish Constitution Developments). istanbul: Yapi Kredi Press, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

47. TBMM Research Center. “Bir Doğrudan Demokrasi Araci Olarak Referandum Uygulama Örnekleri, Turkiye-ABD- Avrupa Örnekleri” (As a Direct Tool For Democracy; Cases on Referendum Practices): Ahmet Yildiz, Ercan Durdular, Mehmet Solak, and Hudai Şencan, eds. Turkey-USA- Europe Case Models. Ankara: TBMM Press, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

48. Teziç, Erdoğan. Anayasa Hukuku (Constitutional Law). istanbul: Beta Press, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

49. Tierney, Stephen. “Should the People Decide: Referendums in a Post-Sovereign Age, the Scottish and Catalonian Cases.” Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy Vol. 45, No. 2 (2016): 99–118.10.5553/NJLP/.000050Search in Google Scholar

50. Tierney, Stephen. “Constitutional Referendums: A Theoretical Enquiry.” Modern Law Review Vol. 72, No. 3 (2009): 360–383.10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00749.xSearch in Google Scholar

51. Tierney, Stephen. Constitutional Referendums: The Theory and Practice of Republican Deliberation. Oxford University Press, 2012.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592791.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

52. Ulari, Pier Vincenzo. “Introduction”: 1–20. In: Michale Gallagher and Pier Vincenzo Uleri, eds. The Referendum Experience in Europe. Macmillan Publishers, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

53. Voigtlander, Nico. and Hans, Joanchim Voth. “Highway to Hitler.” National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 20150 (2014):1–51.10.3386/w20150Search in Google Scholar

54. Wambaugh, Sarah. A Monograph on Plebiscites with a Collection of Official Documents. Oxford University Press, 1920.10.2307/1106470 Search in Google Scholar

1. Law No: 70. Official Gazette: 05.08.1982 / 17773.Search in Google Scholar

2. Law No: 157, Resolution Date:12.12.1960. Official Gazette :16.12.1960/10682.Search in Google Scholar

3. Law No: 2324, Resolution Date: 27.10.1980. Official Gazette: 28.10.1980/12145.10.2307/3560453Search in Google Scholar

4. YSK Law No: 458. Official Gazette: 20.11.1982/17874.Search in Google Scholar

5. TBMM Presidency, Law No: 1, Resolution Date: 12.06.1960. Official Gazette: 14.06.1960/10525.Search in Google Scholar

Empfohlene Artikel von Trend MD