The Influence of the Court of Justice of the European Union on the Issuance of European Arrest Warrants in Lithuania

1. Carrera, Sergio, and Valsamis Mitsilegas. “Upholding the Rule of Law by Scrutinising Judicial Independence: The Irish Court’s Request for a Preliminary Ruling on the European Arrest Warrant” (2018) // https://www.ceps.eu/ceps-publications/upholding-rule-law-scrutinising-judicial-independence-irish-courts-request-preliminary/.Search in Google Scholar

2. Human Rights Monitoring Institute. “Beyond Surrender: The Practice of the European Arrest Warrant in Lithuania” (2018) // http://hrmi.lt/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Beyond-Surrender_2018_HRMI.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

3. Letsas, George. “The Truth in Autonomous Concepts: How to Interpret the ECHR.” European Journal of International Law 15 (2004): 279–305.10.1093/ejil/15.2.279Search in Google Scholar

4. Mancano, Leandro. “Judicial Harmonisation through Autonomous Concepts of European Union Law: The Example of the European Arrest Warrant Framework Decision.” European Law Review 43 (2018): 69–88.Search in Google Scholar

5. Mitsilegas, Valsamis. “Managing Legal Diversity in Europe’s Area of Criminal Justice: The Role of Autonomous Concepts”: 125–59. In: Renauld Colson and Stewart Field, eds. EU Criminal Justice and the Challenges of Diversity: Legal Cultures in the Area of Freedom Security and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

6. Molnar, Tamas. “The Concept of Autonomy of EU Law from the Comparative Perspective of International Law and the Legal Systems of Member States.” Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law (2015): 433–59.10.5553/HYIEL/266627012015003001021Search in Google Scholar

7. “Report to the Lithuanian Government on the Visit to Lithuania Carried Out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 21 to 30 April 2008” (2009) // https://rm.coe.int/1680697335.Search in Google Scholar

1. Asselbourg and 78 Others and Greenpeace Association-Luxembourg v Luxembourg. European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), 1999 Reports 1999-VI.Search in Google Scholar

2. Beyler v Italy. ECtHR, 2000 Reports 2000-I.Search in Google Scholar

3. Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2002, no. 37–1341.Search in Google Scholar

4. Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant and the Surrender Procedures between Member States. OJ L 190, 18 July 2002, 1–20.Search in Google Scholar

5. Draft Agreement Providing for the Accession of the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) Opinion 2/13 ECLI:EU:C:2014:2454.Search in Google Scholar

6. Eriksen v Norway. ECtHR, 1997 Reports 1997-III.Search in Google Scholar

7. Flaminio Costa v E.N.E.L. CJEU, Case 6–64, ECLI:EU:C:1964:66.Search in Google Scholar

8. Minister for Justice and Equality v LM. CJEU, C-216/18 PPU, ECLI:EU:C:2018:586.Search in Google Scholar

9. Minister for Justice and Equality v OG and PI. CJEU, C -508/18 and C -82/19 PPU, ECLI:EU:C:2019:456.Search in Google Scholar

10. Minister for Justice and Equality v PF. CJEU, C-509/18, ECLI:EU:C:2019:457.Search in Google Scholar

11. NV Algemene Transporten Expeditie Onderneming van Gend & Loos v Netherlands Inland Revenue Administration. CJEU, Case 26–62, ECLI:EU:C:1963:1.Search in Google Scholar

12. Openbaar Ministerie v Halil Ibrahim Özçelik. CJEU, C-453/16 PPU, ECLI:EU:C:2016:860.Search in Google Scholar

13. Openbaar Ministerie v Krzysztof Marek Poltorak. CJEU, C -452/16 PPU, ECLI:EU:C:2016:858.Search in Google Scholar

14. Openbaar Ministerie v Krzysztof Marek Poltorak. Opinion of Advocate General. CJEU, C -452/16 PPU, ECLI:EU:C:2016:782.Search in Google Scholar

15. Openbaar Ministerie v Ruslanas Kovalkovas. CJEU, C -477/16 PPU, ECLI:EU:C:2016:861.Search in Google Scholar

16. Openbaar Ministerie v Ruslanas Kovalkovas. Opinion of Advocate General. CJEU, C -477/16 PPU, ECLI:EU:C:2016:784.Search in Google Scholar

17. Pál Aranyosi and Robert Căldăraru v Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Bremen. CJEU, C-404/15 and C-659/15 PPU, ECLI:EU:C:2016:198.Search in Google Scholar

18. Pellegrin v France. ECtHR, 1999 Reports 1999-VIII.10.17077/2168-569X.1309Search in Google Scholar

19. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal C 326, 26 October 2012, P.0001–0390.Search in Google Scholar

20. X v Germany. ECtHR, 1972 Collection 40, 11–14.10.1016/0370-2693(72)90268-7Search in Google Scholar