[Acs, Z. (2002), Innovation and the Growth of Cities, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anselin, L.; Varga, A. & Acs, Z. (1997), ‘Local geographic spillovers between university
research and high technology innovations,’ Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 42,
no. 3, pp. 422–448.10.1006/juec.1997.2032]Search in Google Scholar
[
Archibugi, D.; Filippetti, A. & Frenz, M. (2013a), ‘Economic crisis and innovation:
Is destruction prevailing over accumulation?’ Research Policy, vol. 42, no. 2,
pp. 303–314.10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.002]Search in Google Scholar
[
—— (2013b), ‘The impact of the economic crisis on innovation: Evidence from Europe,’
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 80, no. 7, pp. 1247–1260.10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.005]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barca, F. (2009), An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: A place-based approach
to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Independent report
prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy.
Brussels: European Commission.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Belyakov, V.; Izosimova, A.; Koski, A.; Prause, G. & Rudzite, M. (2010), ‘Promoting
Dynamic Interaction of Universities and Regional Stakeholders,’ in J. W. Kramer,
G. Prause & J. Sepp (eds.) Baltic Business and Socio-Economic Development
2007, Third International Conference Tallinn, Estonia, June 17–19, 2007, Berlin:
Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, pp. 401–444.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bluhm, K.; Demmler, P.; Martens, B. & Trappmann, V. (2008), Fach- und
Führungskräfte in mittelständischen Unternehmen: Bedarf, Rekrutierung und
Bindung. Institut für Soziologie, Working Papers: Economic Sociology Jena,
vol. 6.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bussmann, K. & Werle, M. (2004), ‘Kriminalität – Standortfaktor für betriebliche
Entscheidungen?’ Neue Kriminalpolitik, no. 3, pp. 90–95.10.5771/0934-9200-2004-3-90]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brandt, A. (2010), ‘Branchenspezifische Standortfaktoren,’ RegioVision, vol. 3.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Camagni, R. & Capello, R. (2013), ‘Regional Innovation Patterns and the EU Regional
Policy Reform,’ Growth and Change, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 355–389.10.1111/grow.12012]Search in Google Scholar
[
Capello, R. & Lenzi C. (2012), ‘Territorial patterns of innovation: A taxonomy of
innovative regions in Europe,’ The Annals of Regional Science, vol. 51, no. 1,
pp. 119–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00168-012-0539-810.1007/s00168-012-0539-8]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carlino, G.; Chatterjee, S. & Hunt, R. M. (2007), ‘Urban density and the rate of
invention,’ Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 389–419.10.1016/j.jue.2006.08.003]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ciccone, A. & Hall, R. (1996), ‘Productivity and the Density of Economic Activity,’
American Economic Review, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 54–70.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chinitz, B. (1961), ‘Contrasts in the agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh,’
American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 279–289.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clark, B. R. (2001), ‘The Entrepreneurial University: New Foundations for Collegiality, Autonomy, and Achievement,’ Higher Education Management, vol. 13, no. 2,
pp. 9–24.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cooke, P. & Morgan, K. (1998), The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions, and
Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198290186.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[
David, P.; Foray, D. & Hall, B. (2009), Measuring Smart Specialisation: The Concept
and the Need for Indicators. Knowledge for Growth Expert Group. Retrieved
from http://cemi.epfl.ch/files/content/sites/cemi/files/users/178044/public/
Measuring%20smart%20specialisation.doc [accessed Apr 2014]]Search in Google Scholar
[
Duranton, G. & Puga, D. (2001), ‘Nursery Cities: Urban Diversity, Process Innovation,
and the Life Cycle of Products,’ American Economic Review, vol. 91, no. 5,
pp. 1454–1477.10.1257/aer.91.5.1454]Search in Google Scholar
[
EC (2003), The Role of the Universities in the Europe of Knowledge, Communication
from the Commission Brussels, COM(2003)58 final, 05.02.2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[
—— (2010), Regional Policy Contributing to Smart Growth in Europe, Brussels:
European Commission.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Etzkowitz, H. (2003), ‘Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-
Industry Government Relations,’ Social Science Information, vol. 42, no. 3,
pp. 293–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0539018403042300210.1177/05390184030423002]Search in Google Scholar
[
EU (2009), Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisations
(RIS 3), Research policy, Luxembourg: European Union.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Filippetti, A. & Archibugi, D. (2011), ‘Innovation in times of crisis: National Systems
of Innovation, structure, and demand,’ Research Policy, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 179–192.10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.001]Search in Google Scholar
[
Florida, R. (2002), The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work,
Leisure, Community & Everyday Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fujita, M. & Krugman, P. (2004), ‘The new economy geography: Past, present and the
future,’ Papers in Regional Science, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 139–164.10.1007/s10110-003-0180-0]Search in Google Scholar
[
GEM (2011), ‘Russia,’ Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2011, GEM 2011 Global
Report, London: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.]Search in Google Scholar
[
—— (2014), ‘GEM Global Report,’ Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2013, London:
Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goddard, J. (2000), The Response of HEIs to Regional Needs, Paris: OECD.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hadjimichalis, C. & Hudson, R. (2007), ‘Rethinking Local and Regional Development:
implications for radical political practice in Europe,’ European Urban and
Regional Studies, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 99–113.10.1177/0969776407076290]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hansmann, K. & Höck, M. (2001), Standort Norddeutschland, Hamburg: Universität
Hamburg.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hirsikoski, A.; Koski, A. & Prause, G. (2009), “Promoting Universities’ 3rd Task-
Recommendations for University-Business Cooperation,” in G. Prause &
T. Muravska (eds.) Baltic Business and Socio-Economic Development 2008,
Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, pp. 351–367.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Iammarino, S. & McCann, P. (2006), ‘The structure and evolution of industrial
clusters: transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers,’ Research Policy,
vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1018–1036.10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.004]Search in Google Scholar
[
Innovation Union Scoreboard (2013), Innovation Union Scoreboard, Brussels: European
Union.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jaffe, A.; Trajtenberg, M. & Henderson, R. (1993), ‘Geographic Localization of
Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations,’ The Quarterly Journal
of Economics, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 577–598.10.2307/2118401]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kröhnert, S.; Morgenstern, A. & Klingholz, R. (2007), Talente, Technology und
Toleranz – wo Deutschland Zukunft hat, Berlin: Berlin-Institut für Bevölkerung
und Entwicklung.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krugman, P. (1991), ‘Increasing returns and economic geography,’ Journal of Political
Economy, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 483–499.10.1086/261763]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martens, B.; Michailow, M. & Schmidt, R., eds. (2003), Managementkulturen im
Umbruch, Sonderforschungsbereich 580, vol. 10.]Search in Google Scholar
[
McCann, P. (2008), ‘Globalisation and economic geography: the world is curved, not flat,’
Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 351–370.10.1093/cjres/rsn002]Search in Google Scholar
[
McCann, P. & Acs, Z. (2011), ‘Globalisation: countries, cities and multinationals,’
Regional Studies, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 17–32.10.1080/00343404.2010.505915]Search in Google Scholar
[
McCann, P. & Ortega-Argiles, R. (2013), ‘Modern regional innovation policy,’
Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 187–216.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rst00710.1093/cjres/rst007]Search in Google Scholar
[
—— (2014, in press), ‘Smart Specialisation, Regional Growth and Applications to
European Union Cohesion Policy,’ Regional Studies. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0
0343404.2013.799769]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meier zu Köcker, G. (2008), Clusters in Germany: An Empirical-based Insight View on
Emergence, Financing, Management and Competitiveness of the Most Innovative
Clusters in Germany, Berlin: Institute for Innovation and Technology & Initiative
Competence Networks Germany.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Niebuhr, A. (2006), ‘Migration and Innovation. Does Cultural Diversity Matter
for Regional R&D Activity?’ HWWI Research Paper, vol. 3, no. 1, Hamburg:
Hamburg Institute for International Economics.]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD (2010), Typology of regional innovation systems, Paris: OECD.]Search in Google Scholar
[
—— (2011), Territorial Outlook, Paris: OECD.]Search in Google Scholar
[
—— (2014), Innovation-driven Growth in Regions: The Role of Smart Specialisation,
Paris: OECD.]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Oort, F. (2004), Urban Growth and Innovation: Spatially Bounded Externalities in
the Netherlands, Aldershot: Ashgate.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Porter, M. E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: The Free
Press.10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1]Search in Google Scholar
[
—— (2000), ‘Location, Competition and Economic Development: Local Networks in
a Global Economy,’ Economic Development Quarterly, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 15–34.
Prause, G. (2014, in press), ‘University – Business Interaction in Times of Demographic
Change,’ Innovations.10.1177/089124240001400105]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prause, G. & Hunke, K. (2012), ‘University – Business Interaction in the Context of
Demographic Change,’ in T. Muravska & G. Prause (eds.) European Integration
and Baltic Sea Region Studies: University-Business Partnership through the Triple
Helix Approach, Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, pp. 188–199.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prause, G. & Winkler, K. (2011), “Universities’ third task: On the way towards the
entrepreneurial university – A German Case Study,’ in G. Prause, U. Venesaar (eds.)
University-Business Cooperation: Tallinn 2011, Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-
Verlag, pp. 52–63.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Radosevic, S. (2002), ‘Regional innovation systems in Central and Eastern Europe:
determinants, organizers and alignments,’ The Journal of Technology Transfer,
vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 87–96.10.1023/A:1013152721632]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sternberg, R. (2011), ‘Interregional Disparities, Entrepreneurship, and EU Regional
Policy,’ in M. Minniti (ed.) The Dynamics of Entrepreneurship. Evidence from the
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Data, Oxford & New York: Oxford University
Press, pp. 153–80.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580866.003.0008]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thurner, T. (2014, in press), “Innovation in turbulent times – Russia’s North-Western
Federal District and the financial crisis,” Regional Studies.]Search in Google Scholar
