[Aldrich, Howard E., Cliff, Jennifer E. 2003. The Pervasive Effects of Family on Entrepreneurship: Toward a Family Embeddedness Perspective. Journal of Business Venturing 18: 573–596.10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Biró, A. Zoltán. 2006. Vidéki térségek: illúzió vagy esély? TÉRSÉG könyvek. Miercurea Ciuc: Pro-Print.]Search in Google Scholar
[2016. A fiatal gazdák innovációs szerepe a székelyföldi térségben. In: Biró, A. Z., Magyar, F. (eds.), Agrárinnováció – térségi esély. Fiatal gazdák a székelyföldi térségben. Miercurea Ciuc: Státus. 13–56.]Search in Google Scholar
[2017. Új elitszerepek rurális környezetben. In: Biró, A. Z., Magyar, F. (eds.), A generációváltás esélyei. Agrárvállalkozók innovatív szerepe a székelyföldi térségben. Miercurea Ciuc: Státus. 13–39.]Search in Google Scholar
[2019. Székelyföld: társadalomtudományi megközelítések. Metszetek 8 (2): 3–16.10.18392/metsz/2019/2/1]Search in Google Scholar
[Biró, A. Zoltán, Magyar, Ferenc. 2013. Vidék és versenyképesség. Agrárinnovációs helyzetkép a székelyföldi térségben. Miercurea Ciuc: Státus.]Search in Google Scholar
[2017. A generációváltás esélyei. Agrárvállalkozók innovatív szerepe a székelyföldi térségben. Miercurea Ciuc: Státus.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bock, Bettina Barbara. 2012. Social Innovation and Sustainability: How to Disentangle the Buzzword and Its Application in the Field of Agriculture and Rural Development. Studies in Agricultural Economics 114: 57–63.10.7896/j.1209]Search in Google Scholar
[Boonstra, Wiebren J., Ahnström, Johan, Hallgren, Lars. 2011. Swedish Farmers Talking about Nature. Sociologia Ruralis 51(4): 420–435.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00547.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Bosworth, Gary, Willett, Joanie. 2011. Embeddedness or Escapism? Rural Perceptions and Economic Development in Cornwall and Northumberland. Sociologia Ruralis 51(2): 195–214.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00533.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Cederholm Björklund, J., Johansson, Jeaneth. 2019. Farming beyond Food: Effect of Embeddedness and Governance Structures on Farmers’ Role in Rural Development. (http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1384688/FULLTEXT01.pdf).]Search in Google Scholar
[Commandeur, Monica Alida Maria. 2006. Diversity of Pig Farming Styles: Understanding How It Is Structured. NJAS 54 (1): 111–127.10.1016/S1573-5214(06)80007-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Dudek, Michael. 2016. Economic Activity in Agriculture in the Perspective of Embeddedness Theory: The Case of Poland. Economics of Agriculture 1: 205–215.10.5937/ekoPolj1601205D]Search in Google Scholar
[Fischer, Heike, Burton, Rob, J. F. 2014. Understanding Farm Succession as Socially Constructed Endogenous Cycles. Sociologia Ruralis 54(4): 417–438.10.1111/soru.12055]Search in Google Scholar
[Floysand, Arnt, Sjoholt, Peter. 2007. Rural Development and Embeddedness: The Importance of Human Relations for Industrial Restructuring in Rural Areas. Sociologia Ruralis 47(3): 205–227.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00438.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Gedajlovic, Eric, Honig, Benson, Moore, Curt. B., Payne, G. Tyge, Wright, Mike. 2013. Social capital and entrepreneurship: A schema and research agenda. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 37(3): 455–478.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gergen, Kenneth, J., Gergen, Mary, M. 2001. A narratívumok és az én mint viszonyrendszer. In: László, J., Thomka, B. (eds.), Narratívák 5. Narratív pszichológia. Budapest: Kijárat Kiadó. 77–120.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gezelius, Stig S. 2014. Exchange and Social Structure in Norwegian Agricultural Communities: How Farmers Acquire Labour and Capital. Sociologia Ruralis 54(2): 206–226.10.1111/soru.12042]Search in Google Scholar
[Granovetter, Mark. 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology 91(3): 481–510.10.1086/228311]Search in Google Scholar
[Hansen, Niles. 1995. Addressing Regional Disparity and Equity Objectives through Regional Policies: A Sceptical Perspective. Papers in Regional Science 74: 89–104.10.1111/j.1435-5597.1995.tb00630.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Hinrics, C. Clare. 2000. Embeddedness and Local Food Systems: Notes on Two Types of Direct Agricultural Market. Journal of Rural Studies 16: 295–303.10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00063-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Hite, M. Julie. 2005. Evolutionary Processes and Paths of Relationally Embedded Network Ties in Emerging Entrepreneurial Firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 29(1): 113–144.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jack, Sarah L., Anderson, Alistair L. 2002. The Effects of Embeddedness on the Entrepreneurial Process. Journal of Business Venturing 17(5): 476–487.10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00076-3]Search in Google Scholar
[KAM. 2004. Székelyföldi háztartásvizsgálat 2004. Research report (manuscript). 2011. Székelyföldi háztartásvizsgálat 2011. Research report (manuscript).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kietavainen, Asta. 2013. Narrated Agency and Identity of Settlement Farmers in the Changing Circumstances of Modern Society. Sociologia Ruralis 54(1): 57–70.10.1111/soru.12028]Search in Google Scholar
[Laki, László, Biró A. Zoltán. 2001. On the Edge of Globalisation. Central European Political Science Review 2(5): 185–218.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lombardi, Alessia, Migliore, Giuseppina, Verneau, Fabio, Schifani, Giorgio, Cembalo, Luigi. 2015. Are “Good Guys” More Likely to Participate in Local Agriculture? Food Quality and Preference 45: 158–165.10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.06.005]Search in Google Scholar
[McKeever, Edward, Jack, Sarah, Anderson, Alistair. 2014. Social Embeddedness in Entrepreneurship Research: The Importance of Context and Community. In: Chell, E., Karataş-Özkan, M. (eds.), Handbook of Research on Small Business Entrepreneurship. London: Edward Elgar. 222–236.]Search in Google Scholar
[2015. Embedded Entrepreneurship in the Creative Re-Construction of Place. Journal of Business Venturing 30(1): 50–65.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Magyar, Ferenc. 2018. Kísérlet vagy modell? Az agrárinnováció mint székelyföldi fejlesztési paradigma. Miercurea Ciuc: Státus.]Search in Google Scholar
[2019. Digitális agrárium – székelyföldi innováció. Az agrárium digitalizációjának térségi környezete. Miercurea Ciuc: Státus.]Search in Google Scholar
[Murdoch, Jonathan. 2000. Networks: A New Paradigm of Rural Development? Journal of Rural Studies 16(4): 407–419.10.1016/S0743-0167(00)00022-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Müller, Sabine, Korsgaard, Steffen. 2018. Resources and Bridging: The Role of Spatial Context in Rural Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 30(1–2): 224–255.10.1080/08985626.2017.1402092]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 2006. The New Rural Paradigm: Policies and Governance. Paris: OECD Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Polanyi, Karl. 1944/2001. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston MA: Beacon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schifani, Giorgio, Migliore, Giuseppina, Hashem, Shadi, Pietro, Romeo. 2016. Identifying Social Entrepreneurial Behaviour in Farmers’ Participation in Alternative Food Network. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics 71(1): 495–504.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shucksmith, Mark. 2010. Disintegrated Rural Development? Neo-Endogenous Rural Development, Planning and Place-Shaping in Diffused Power Contexts. Sociologia Ruralis 50(1): 1–14.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00497.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Uzzi, Brian. 1997. Social Structure and Competition: The Paradox of Embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 35–67.10.2307/2393808]Search in Google Scholar
[Van der Ploeg, Jan Douwe. 1994. Styles of Farming. An Introductory Note on Concepts and Methodology. In: Van der Ploeg, J. D., Long, A. (eds.), Born from within. Practices and Perspectives of Endogenous Rural Development. Assen: Van Gorcum. 7–30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Van der Ploeg, Jan Douwe, Renting, Henk, Brunori, Gianluca, Knickel, Karlheinz, Mannion, Joe, Marsden, Terry, De Roest, Kees, Sevilla-Guzmán, Eduardo, Ventura, Flaminia. 2000. Rural Development: From Practices and Policies towards Theory. Sociologia Ruralis 40(4): 391–408.10.1111/1467-9523.00156]Search in Google Scholar
[Ward, Neil. 2002. Integrated Rural Development – A Review of the Literature. Centre for Rural Research, University of Trondheim.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zahra, Shaker. 2007. Contextualizing Theory Building in Entrepreneurship Research. Journal of Business Venturing 22(3): 433–452.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.04.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Zukin, Sharon, Dimaggio, Paul. 1990. Introduction. In: Zukin, S., DiMaggio, P. (eds.), Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1–36.]Search in Google Scholar
