[ABOU-EL-ENIN, O. H. – FADE, J. G. – MACKILL, D. J. 1999. Differences in chemical composition and fibre digestion of rice straw with, and without, anhydrous ammonia from 53 rice varieties. In Animal Feed Science and Technology, vol. 79, pp. 129–136.10.1016/S0377-8401(98)00271-5]Search in Google Scholar
[ABRAHAM, A. – MATHEW, A. K. – SINDHU, R. – PANDEY, A. – BINOD, P. 2016. Potential of rice straw for bio-refining: An overview. In Bioresource Technology, vol. 215, pp. 29–36.10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.011]Search in Google Scholar
[AMANULLAH, J. – INAMULLAH, Z. 2016. Dry matter partitioning and harvest index differ in rice genotypes with variable rates of phosphorus and zinc nutrition. In Rice Science, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 78–87.10.1016/j.rsci.2015.09.006]Search in Google Scholar
[BAKKER, R. R. C. – ELBERSEN, H. W. – POPPENS, R. P. – LESSCHEN, J. P. 2013. Rice straw and wheat straw. Potential feedstocks for the biobased economy. Netherlands Agency.]Search in Google Scholar
[BELOEV, I. – GABROVSKA-EVSTATIEVA, K. – EVSTATIEV, B. 2017. Compensation of CO2 emissions from petrol stations with photovoltaic parks: Cost-benefit and risk analysis. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 85–90.10.1515/ata-2017-0017]Search in Google Scholar
[BUENO, C. S. – LAFARGE, T. 2009. Higher crop performance of rice hybrids than of elite inbreds in the tropics: 1. Hybrids accumulate more biomass during each phenological phase. In Field Crops Research, vol. 112, pp. 229–237.10.1016/j.fcr.2009.03.006]Search in Google Scholar
[DOBERMANN, A. – FAIRHURST, T. H. 2000. Chapter 1.9. Managing Organic Manures, Straw, and Green Manure. In Rice: Nutrient disorders & nutrient management. Handbook series. Potash & Phosphate Institute (PPI), Potash & Phosphate Institute of Canada (PPIC) and International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), pp. 38–42. ISBN 9789810579494.]Search in Google Scholar
[FAN, J. – McCONKEY, B. – JANZEN, H. – TOWNLEY-SMITH, L. – WANG, H. 2017. Harvest index–yield relationship for estimating crop residue in cold continental climates. In Field Crops Research, vol. 204, pp. 153–157.10.1016/j.fcr.2017.01.014]Search in Google Scholar
[FAGERIA, N. K. – MOREIRA, A. – COELHO, A. M. 2011. Yield and yield components of upland rice as influenced by nitrogen sources. In Journal of Plant Nutrition, vol. 34, pp. 361–370.10.1080/01904167.2011.536878]Search in Google Scholar
[FEDNA. 2013. FEDNA – Spanish Foundation for the Development of Animal Nutrition – standards for the formulation of compound feed (Normas Fedna – Fundación Española para el Desarrollo de la Nutrición Animal – para la formulación de piensos compuestos).]Search in Google Scholar
[FEKADU, D. – WALELEGN, M. – TEREFE, G. 2017. Indexing Ethiopian feed stuffs using relative feed value: Dry forages and roughages, energy supplements, and protein supplements. In Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, vol. 7, no. 21, pp. 57–60.]Search in Google Scholar
[GARSTANG, J. – MACKIE, E. – MATTHEWS, R. – PROCTER, C. H. – RANDLE, T. – SMITH, C. – TUBBY, I. – WILSON, L. 2009. Bioenergy Review – Mapping Work. Science report: SC070001/SR2. Environment Agency.]Search in Google Scholar
[HASANJANZADEHA, H. – HEDJAZIA, S. – ASHORIB, A. – MAHDAVIC, S. – YOUSEFI, H. 2014. Effects of hemicellulose pre- extraction and cellulose nanofiber on the properties of rice straw pulp. In International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 68, pp. 198–204.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.04.052]Search in Google Scholar
[HAY, R. K. M.1995. Harvest index: A review of its use in plant breeding and crop physiology. In Annals of Applied Biology, vol. 26, pp. 197–216.10.1111/j.1744-7348.1995.tb05015.x]Search in Google Scholar
[HEGAZY, R. – SNADRO, J. M. 2016. Rice straw collection. International Rice Research Institute Crop and Environmental Sciences Division Postharvest Unit.]Search in Google Scholar
[HUSSAIN, S. – FUJII, T. – MCGOEY, S. – YAMADA, M. – RAMZAN, M. – AKMAL, M. 2014. Evaluation of different rice varieties for growth and yield characteristics. In Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1504–1510.]Search in Google Scholar
[ION, V. – DICU, G. – DUMBRAVĂ, M. – TEMOCICO, G. – ALECU, I. N. – BĂŞA, A. G. – STATE, D. 2015. Harvest index at maize in different growing conditions. In Romanian Biotechnological Letters, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1–10.]Search in Google Scholar
[JUNTA DE EXTREMADURA. 2017. Agriculture and livestock of Extremadura in 2016 (La agricultura y la ganadería extremeñas 2016). Fundación CB. 364 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[KINIRY, J. R. – MC-CAULEY, G. – XIE, Y. – ARNOLD, J. G. 2001. Rice parameters describing crop performance of four rice cultivars. In Agronomy Journal, vol. 93, pp. 1354–1361.10.2134/agronj2001.1354]Search in Google Scholar
[LIU, Z. – LIU, X. – FEI, B. – JIANG, Z. – CAI, Z. – YUA, Y. 2013. The properties of pellets from mixing bamboo and rice straw. In Renewable Energy, vol. 55, pp. 1–5.10.1016/j.renene.2012.12.014]Search in Google Scholar
[MATÍAS, J. – GARCÍA, A. – GONZÁLEZ, D. – GARCÍA, J. – HERNÁNDEZ-GARCÍA, F. I. – IZQUIERDO, M. 2018. Use of rice husk in Iberian pigs during the pre-montanera period for welfare diets. Preliminary results. In Archivos de Zootecnia, Proceedings 9th International Symposium on the Mediterranean Pig, Portalegre (Portugal), pp. 37–40.10.21071/az.v67iSupplement.3568]Search in Google Scholar
[MATSUMURA, Y. – MINOWAB, T. – YAMAMOTO, H. 2005. Amount, availability, and potential use of rice straw (agricultural residue) biomass as an energy resource in Japan. In Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 29, pp. 347–354.10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.06.015]Search in Google Scholar
[MORENO-GARCÍA, B. – GUILLÉN, M. – QUÍLEZ, D. 2017. Response of paddy rice to fertilisation with pig slurry in northeast Spain: Strategies to optimise nitrogen use efficiency. In Field Crops Research, vol. 208, pp. 44–54.10.1016/j.fcr.2017.01.023]Search in Google Scholar
[OLK, D. C. – VAN KESSEL, C. – BRONSON, K. F. 2000. Managing soil organic matter in rice and non-rice soils: Agronomic questions. In Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics in Flooded Soils. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines, pp. 27–47. ISBN 9712201406.]Search in Google Scholar
[OSORIO, J. F. 2007. Evolution of growth, grain yield and partition of photosynthates in 14 varieties of rice representing various breeding cycles in Colombi. Universidad de Colombia, Palmira. 135 pp. (In Spanish: Evolución del crecimiento, rendimiento de grano y partición de fotosintatos en 14 variedades de arroz representantes de diversos ciclos de mejoramiento en Colombia).]Search in Google Scholar
[PALUMBO, M. – AVELLANEDA, J. – LACASTA, A. M. 2015.Availability of crop by-products in Spain: New raw materials for natural thermal insulation. In Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 99, pp. 1–6.10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.03.012]Search in Google Scholar
[PRASAD, P. V. V. – BOOTE, K. J. – ALLEN, L. H – SHEEHY, J. E. – THOMAS, J. M. G. 2006. Species, ecotype and cultivar differences in spikelet fertility and harvest index of rice in response to high temperature stress. In Field Crops Research, vol. 95, pp. 398–411.10.1016/j.fcr.2005.04.008]Search in Google Scholar
[RAHIMI-AJDADI, F. – ASLI-ARDEH, A. A. E. – AHMADI-ARA, A. 2018. Effect of varying parboiling conditions on head rice yield for common paddy varieties in Iran. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–7.10.2478/ata-2018-0001]Search in Google Scholar
[SARNKLONG, C. – CONE, J. W. – PELLIKAAN, W. – HENDRIKS, W. H. 2010. Utilization of rice straw and different treatments to improve its feed value for ruminants: A review. In Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 680–692.10.5713/ajas.2010.80619]Search in Google Scholar
[SINGH, D. K – GUPTA, S. – NANDA, G. – SHARMA, Y. – SINGH, V. V. – BISARYA, D. 2017. Evaluation of rice varieties for yield under organic farming in Tarai. In International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 734–738.10.20546/ijcmas.2017.604.090]Search in Google Scholar
[SINGH, R. – SRIVASTAVA, M. – SHUKLA, A. 2016. Environmental sustainability of bioethanol production from rice straw in India: A review. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 54, pp. 202–216.10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.005]Search in Google Scholar
[TOWNSEND, T. J. – SPARKES, D. L. – WILSON, P. 2017. Food and bioenergy: Reviewing the potential of dual purpose wheat crops. In GCB Bioenergy, vol. 9, pp. 525–540.10.1111/gcbb.12302]Search in Google Scholar
[VADIVELOO, J. – NURFARIZA, B. – FADEL, J. G. 2009. Nutritional improvement of rice husks. In Animal Feed Science and Technology, vol. 151, no. 3, pp. 299–305.10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.03.002]Search in Google Scholar
[VADIVELOO, J. 2000. Nutritional properties of the leaf and stem of rice straw. In Animal Feed Science and Technology, vol. 83, pp. 57–65.10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00107-8]Search in Google Scholar
[VADIVELOO, J. – PHANG, O. C. 1996. Differences in the nutritive value of two rice varieties as influenced by season and location. In Animal Feed Science and Technology, vol. 61, pp. 247–258.10.1016/0377-8401(95)00944-2]Search in Google Scholar