Mapping Stakeholders and Their Networks for Strategic Communication in the Romanian Health Sector – A Public Relations Approach

1OECD/ /European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Romania: Country Health Profile 2023 [Internet]. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2023 [cited 2023 Dec 21]. Available from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/romania-country-health-profile-2023_f478769b-enSearch in Google Scholar

2European Commission. REPowerEU [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Dec 23]. Available from: https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal/repowereu-affordable-secure-and-sustainable-energy-europe_enSearch in Google Scholar

3Theaker A, editor. The Public Relations Handbook. 4th ed. London: Routledge; 2011. 504 p.Search in Google Scholar

4Grunig JE, editor. Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. New York: Routledge; 2013. 680 p.Search in Google Scholar

5Aghazadeh S, Aldoory L. Health Communication Theory in Public Relations. In: Botan C, Sommerfeldt Er, editors. Public Relations Theory III [Internet]. Routledge; 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003141396Search in Google Scholar

6Botan C, Sommerfeldt E. Public Relations Theory III: In the Age of Publics. Reprint edition. New York London: Routledge; 2023. 556 p.Search in Google Scholar

7Gregory A. Public Relations and Management. In: The Public Relations Handbook. 6th ed. Routledge; 2020.Search in Google Scholar

8Gill M. Public Relations and Social Media. In: Thompson TL, editor. Encyclopedia of Health Communication. Sage Publications; 2014. p. 1137–40.Search in Google Scholar

9Duhé S, Wright DK. Symmetry, Social Media, and the Enduring Imperative of Two-Way Communication. In: Public Relations and Communication Management. Routledge; 2013. p. 93–107.Search in Google Scholar

10Rawlins B. Prioritizing Stakeholders for Public Relations [Internet]. Institute for Public Relations; 2006. Available from: https://www.instituteforpr.org/wp-content/uploads/2006_Stakeholders_1.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

11Grunig JE, editor. Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. 1st edition. Hillsdale, N.J: Routledge; 1992. 680 p.Search in Google Scholar

12Grunig J. Situational theory of publics. In: Heath R, editor. Encyclopedia of Public Relations. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2005. p. 778–80.Search in Google Scholar

13Kim JN. Public segmentation using situational theory of problem solving: Illustrating summation method and testing segmented public profiles. PRism. 2011;8(2):1–12.Search in Google Scholar

14Bernstein D. Company Image and Reality: A Critique of Corporate Communications. First Edition. Eastbourne: Holt Rinehart and Winston; 1984. 261 p.Search in Google Scholar

15Siano A, Palazzo M, Foroudi P, Vollero A. Rethinking Bernstein communication wheel: A re-visitation of a communication tool. Bottom Line [Internet]. 2017 Jan 1 [cited 2023 Sep 22];30(3):186–94. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-08-2017-0018Search in Google Scholar

16Ruoslahti H. Co-creation of Knowledge for Innovation Requires Multi-Stakeholder Public Relations. In: Public Relations and the Power of Creativity [Internet]. Emerald Publishing Limited; 2018 [cited 2023 Dec 22]. p. 115–33. (Advances in Public Relations and Communication Management; vol. 3). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-391420180000003007Search in Google Scholar

17Rowley TJ. Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences. Acad Manage Rev [Internet]. 1997 Oct [cited 2023 Dec 23];22(4):887–910. Available from: https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/AMR.1997.9711022107Search in Google Scholar

18Doerfel ML, Taylor M. The Story of Collective Action: The Emergence of Ideological Leaders, Collective Action Network Leaders, and Cross-Sector Network Partners in Civil Society. J Commun [Internet]. 2017 Dec 1 [cited 2023 Dec 23];67(6):920–43. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12340Search in Google Scholar

19Yang A, Uysal N, Taylor M. Unleashing the Power of Networks: Shareholder Activism, Sustainable Development and Corporate Environmental Policy. Bus Strategy Environ [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Dec 23];27(6):712–27. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bse.2026Search in Google Scholar

20Yang A, Saffer AJ. Embracing a network perspective in the network society: The dawn of a new paradigm in strategic public relations. Public Relat Rev [Internet]. 2019 Nov [cited 2023 Dec 23];45(4):101843. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0363811119303790Search in Google Scholar

21Activitatea rețelei sanitare și de ocrotire a sănătății în anul 2022 [The activity of the sanitary and health protection network in 2022] [Internet]. Institutul Național de Statistică (INS), România; 2023 Mar. Available from: https://insse.ro/cms/sites/default/files/com_presa/com_pdf/activ_unit_sanitare22r.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

22Facultatea de Comunicare şi Relaţii Publice - Program postuniversitar de Comunicare in domeniul sănătății - S.N.S.P.A. [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jan 27]. Available from: https://www.comunicare.ro/index.php?page=comunicare-in-sectorul-medicalSearch in Google Scholar

23Popa-Velea O, Diaconescu LV, Mihailescu AI. Comunicare. Comunicare medicală. Bucuresti: Editura Universitara Carol Davila; 2023.Search in Google Scholar

24Popa-Velea O, Diaconescu LV, Mihailescu AI. Psihologie medicală și comunicare medicală. Note de curs. Bucuresti: Editura Universitara Carol Davila; 2023. 225 p.Search in Google Scholar

25Mahler B. Comunicarea medic–pacient în cuvinte și dincolo de ele. Bucuresti: Humanitas; 2023. 22 p.Search in Google Scholar

26Barbaros CM. Comunicarea în domeniul sănătății. Teorii, modele explicative, aplicații. Iași: Editura Universităţii “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” din Iași; 2021. 216 p.Search in Google Scholar

27Legea 95/2006 privind reforma în domeniul sănătății [Internet]. 95 Apr 14, 2006. Available from: https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocumentAfis/268541Search in Google Scholar

28Legea 269/2023 pentru modificarea și completarea Legii nr. 95/2006 privind reforma în domeniul sănătății [Internet]. 269 Oct 10, 2023. Available from: https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/275200Search in Google Scholar

29DSP- website [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 26]. Available from: https://dsp.ro/Search in Google Scholar

30CNAS - website [Internet]. Casa Națională de Asigurări de Sănătate. [cited 2023 Dec 26]. Available from: https://cnas.ro/informatiigenerale/Search in Google Scholar

31C.A.S.A.O.P.S.N.A.J. - The health insurance house of defense, public order, national security and judicial authorities [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 27]. Available from: http://www.aopsnaj.ro/Search in Google Scholar

32National Institute for Public Health [Institutul National de Sanatate Publica] [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 27]. Available from: https://old.insp.gov.ro/Search in Google Scholar

33Order 82/2019 for the approval of the organization chart and the Organization and Operation of the Institute National of Public Health [Internet]. 82 2019 p. 26. Available from: https://old.insp.gov.ro/dj/documente/Regulamentul%20de%20Organizare%20si%20Functionare%20al%20INSP%20in%20viguare%20incepand%20cu%20data%20de%2012.02.2019.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

34Romanian College of Physicians [Colegiul Medicilor din România] [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 26]. Available from: https://www.cmr.ro/Search in Google Scholar

35College of Pharmacist in Romania [Colegiul Farmacistilor din Romania] [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 26]. Available from: https://www.colegfarm.ro/Search in Google Scholar

36College of Dentists in Romania [CMSR – Colegiul Medicilor Stomatologi din Romania] [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 28]. Available from: https://cmdr.ro/Search in Google Scholar

37OAMGMAMR [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 26]. OAMGMAMR - Ordinul Asistenţilor Medicali Generalişti, Moaşelor şi Asistenţilor Medicali din România. Available from: https://www.oamr.ro/Search in Google Scholar

38College of Patients in Romania [Colegiul Pacientilor din Romania] [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 27]. Available from: https://colegiulpacientilor.org/Search in Google Scholar

39Dăruiește Viață [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 23]. Available from: https://www.daruiesteviata.ro/investesteSearch in Google Scholar

40Daruieste Aripi [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 23]. Available from: https://www.daruiestearipi.ro/en/what-we-do/Search in Google Scholar

41HOSPICE Casa Speranţei [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Dec 23]. HOSPICE Casa Speranţei. Available from: https://www.hospice.ro/despre/Search in Google Scholar

42Asociația Zi de Bine! - E simplu să faci Bine [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 23]. Available from: https://www.zidebine.ro/Search in Google Scholar

43Viata Medicala [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 23]. Available from: https://www.viata-medicala.ro/mass-media-si-interesul-sanatatii-publice-21600Search in Google Scholar

44Kok G, Gurabardhi Z, Gottlieb NH, Zijlstra FRH. Influencing Organizations to Promote Health: Applying Stakeholder Theory. Health Educ Behav [Internet]. 2015 Apr 1 [cited 2023 Dec 22];42(1_ suppl):123S-132S. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198115571363Search in Google Scholar

45Dabravolskaj J, Montemurro G, Ekwaru JP, Wu XY, Storey K, Campbell S, et al. Effectiveness of school-based health promotion interventions prioritized by stakeholders from health and education sectors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med Rep [Internet]. 2020 Sep 1 [cited 2023 Dec 23];19:101138. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221133552030098XSearch in Google Scholar

46Wale JL, Thomas S, Hamerlijnck D, Hollander R. Patients and public are important stakeholders in health technology assessment but the level of involvement is low – a call to action. Res Involv Engagem [Internet]. 2021 Jan 5 [cited 2023 Dec 23];7(1):1. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00248-9Search in Google Scholar

47Kim Y, Zapata Ramos ML. Stakeholder responses toward fast food chains’ CSR: Public health-related vs generic social issue-related CSR initiatives. Corp Commun Int J [Internet]. 2018 Jan 1 [cited 2023 Dec 23];23(1):117–38. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-05-2017-0047Search in Google Scholar

48Brailsford SC, Bolt T, Connell C, Klein JH, Patel B. Stakeholder engagement in health care simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC) [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2023 Dec 23]. p. 1840–9. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5429190Search in Google Scholar

49Hyder A, Syed S, Puvanachandra P, Bloom G, Sundaram S, Mahmood S, et al. Stakeholder analysis for health research: Case studies from low- and middle-income countries. Public Health [Internet]. 2010 Mar 1 [cited 2023 Dec 23];124(3):159–66. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003335061000003XSearch in Google Scholar

50Brownstein JN, Hirsch GR, Rosenthal EL, Rush CH. Community Health Workers “101” for Primary Care Providers and Other Stakeholders in Health Care Systems. J Ambulatory Care Manage [Internet]. 2011 Sep [cited 2023 Dec 23];34(3):210. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/ambulatorycaremanagement/abstract/2011/07000/community_health_workers__101__for_primary_care.3.aspxSearch in Google Scholar

51Savage GT, Dunkin JW, Ford DM. Responding to a Crisis: A Stakeholder Analysis of Community Health Organizations. J Health Hum Serv Adm [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2023 Dec 23];26(4):383–414. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41288048Search in Google Scholar

52Inoue T. Public Relations in Hyper-globalization: Essential Relationship Management - A Japan Perspective. Routledge; 2018. 321 p.Search in Google Scholar

53Sriramesh K, Vercic D, editors. The Global Public Relations Handbook: Theory, Research, and Practice [Internet]. 3rd ed. Routledge; 2020. 366 p. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315173290Search in Google Scholar