Comparative effect of the Myobrace appliance versus traditional functional appliances in treating a class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Department of Orthodontics, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Research Institute of Stomatology, Nanjing UniversityNanjing, People’s Republic of China
Department of Orthodontics, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Research Institute of Stomatology, Nanjing UniversityNanjing, People’s Republic of China
Department of Orthodontics, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Research Institute of Stomatology, Nanjing UniversityNanjing, People’s Republic of China
Department of Orthodontics, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Research Institute of Stomatology, Nanjing UniversityNanjing, People’s Republic of China
Department of Orthodontics, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Research Institute of Stomatology, Nanjing UniversityNanjing, People’s Republic of China
Department of Orthodontics, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Research Institute of Stomatology, Nanjing UniversityNanjing, People’s Republic of China
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ghaffar F, Jan A, Akhtar O, Mughal AT, Shahid R, Shafique HZ, et al. Comparative analysis of dentoskeletal changes of the twin block appliance and the AdvanSync2 appliance in treatment of skeletal class-II malocclusion in Pakistani population: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Dent. 2022;16:680–7.GhaffarFJanAAkhtarOMughalATShahidRShafiqueHZComparative analysis of dentoskeletal changes of the twin block appliance and the AdvanSync2 appliance in treatment of skeletal class-II malocclusion in Pakistani population: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Dent. 2022;16:680–7.Search in Google Scholar
Perrotta S, Bucci R, Simeon V, Martina S, Michelotti A, Valletta R. Prevalence of malocclusion, oral parafunctions and temporomandibular disorder-pain in Italian schoolchildren: an epidemiological study. J Oral Rehabil. 2019;46:611–6.PerrottaSBucciRSimeonVMartinaSMichelottiAVallettaR.Prevalence of malocclusion, oral parafunctions and temporomandibular disorder-pain in Italian schoolchildren: an epidemiological study. J Oral Rehabil. 2019;46:611–6.Search in Google Scholar
Rego MV, Martinez EF, Coelho RM, Leal LM, Thiesen G. Perception of changes in soft-tissue profile after Herbst appliance treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;151:559–64.RegoMVMartinezEFCoelhoRMLealLMThiesenG.Perception of changes in soft-tissue profile after Herbst appliance treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;151:559–64.Search in Google Scholar
Lin M, Xie C, Yang H, Wu C, Ren A. Prevalence of malocclusion in Chinese schoolchildren from 1991 to 2018: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2020;30:144–55.LinMXieCYangHWuCRenA.Prevalence of malocclusion in Chinese schoolchildren from 1991 to 2018: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2020;30:144–55.Search in Google Scholar
Choi SH, Kim JS, Cha JY, Hwang CJ. Effect of malocclusion severity on oral health-related quality of life and food intake ability in a Korean population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;149:384–90.ChoiSHKimJSChaJYHwangCJ.Effect of malocclusion severity on oral health-related quality of life and food intake ability in a Korean population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;149:384–90.Search in Google Scholar
Pancherz H, Zieber K, Hoyer B. Cephalometric characteristics of Class II division 1 and Class II division 2 malocclusions: a comparative study in children. Angle Orthod. 1997;67:111–20.PancherzHZieberKHoyerB.Cephalometric characteristics of Class II division 1 and Class II division 2 malocclusions: a comparative study in children. Angle Orthod. 1997;67:111–20.Search in Google Scholar
Marsico E, Gatto E, Burrascano M, Matarese G, Cordasco G. Effectiveness of orthodontic treatment with functional appliances on mandibular growth in the short term. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139:24–36.MarsicoEGattoEBurrascanoMMatareseGCordascoG.Effectiveness of orthodontic treatment with functional appliances on mandibular growth in the short term. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139:24–36.Search in Google Scholar
Rongo R, Martina S, Bucci R, Valletta R, D’Antò V, Martina R. Differences in craniofacial growth of Class II individuals from different decades: a retrospective study. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019;22:304–11.RongoRMartinaSBucciRVallettaRD’AntòVMartinaR.Differences in craniofacial growth of Class II individuals from different decades: a retrospective study. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019;22:304–11.Search in Google Scholar
Kerstein RB, Farrell S. Treatment of myofascial pain-dysfunction syndrome with occlusal equilibration. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63:695–700.KersteinRBFarrellS.Treatment of myofascial pain-dysfunction syndrome with occlusal equilibration. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63:695–700.Search in Google Scholar
Vecchio S, Manzini P, Candida E, Gargari M. Froggy mouth: a new myofunctional approach to atypical swallowing. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2019;20:33–7.VecchioSManziniPCandidaEGargariM.Froggy mouth: a new myofunctional approach to atypical swallowing. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2019;20:33–7.Search in Google Scholar
Aggarwal I, Wadhawan M, Dhir V. Myobraces: say no to traditional braces. Int J Oral Care Res. 2016;4:82–5.AggarwalIWadhawanMDhirV.Myobraces: say no to traditional braces. Int J Oral Care Res. 2016;4:82–5.Search in Google Scholar
Madian AM, Elfouly D. Cephalometric changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions after functional treatment with twin block versus myobrace appliances in developing skeletal class II patients: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23:998.MadianAMElfoulyD.Cephalometric changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions after functional treatment with twin block versus myobrace appliances in developing skeletal class II patients: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23:998.Search in Google Scholar
Çoban Büyükbayraktar Z, Camcı H. Dentoalveolar, skeletal, pharyngeal airway, cervical posture, hyoid bone position, and soft palate changes with Myobrace and Twin-block: a retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23:53.Çoban BüyükbayraktarZCamcıH.Dentoalveolar, skeletal, pharyngeal airway, cervical posture, hyoid bone position, and soft palate changes with Myobrace and Twin-block: a retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23:53.Search in Google Scholar
Rezky Oktaviyani R, Harun A, Wesley K, Iriani F, Nurwahidah A, Sulfina H, et al. Myobrace versus twin block in the treatment of class II malocclusion in children: a systematic review. Saudi Dent J. 2024;36:661–4.Rezky OktaviyaniRHarunAWesleyKIrianiFNurwahidahASulfinaHMyobrace versus twin block in the treatment of class II malocclusion in children: a systematic review. Saudi Dent J. 2024;36:661–4.Search in Google Scholar
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Med. 2009;3:e123–30.MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJAltmanDG.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Med. 2009;3:e123–30.Search in Google Scholar
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 2nd Edition. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2019.HigginsJPTThomasJChandlerJCumpstonMLiTPageMJWelchVA, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 2nd Edition. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2019.Search in Google Scholar
Karem S, Emile N, Damien F, Fabrice K, Yves P, Jacques C. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73:712–6.KaremSEmileNDamienFFabriceKYvesPJacquesC.Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73:712–6.Search in Google Scholar
Higgins JPTS, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60.HigginsJPTSDeeksJJAltmanDG.Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60.Search in Google Scholar
Xie L, Wang P, Wu J. Soft and hard tissue changes following treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with twin-block and myofunctional appliance: a pilot study. Chin J Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;2:217–7.XieLWangPWuJ.Soft and hard tissue changes following treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with twin-block and myofunctional appliance: a pilot study. Chin J Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;2:217–7.Search in Google Scholar
Samuel JJ, Savitha S, Hurlihal SC, Shankar HK, Ambili R, Nandan S. A comparative evaluation of the dentoskeletal treatment effects using twin block appliance and myobrace system on class II Division I malocclusion. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(S1):S10–S7.SamuelJJSavithaSHurlihalSCShankarHKAmbiliRNandanS.A comparative evaluation of the dentoskeletal treatment effects using twin block appliance and myobrace system on class II Division I malocclusion. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(S1):S10–S7.Search in Google Scholar
Sun Q, Peng Y. Comparison of the curative effects of MRC appliance K series and Activator in the treatment of mouth breathing patients. Chin J Conserv Dent. 2018;28:410-13.SunQPengY.Comparison of the curative effects of MRC appliance K series and Activator in the treatment of mouth breathing patients. Chin J Conserv Dent. 2018;28:410-13.Search in Google Scholar
Idris G, Hajeer MY, Al-Jundi A. Soft- and hard-tissue changes following treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion with Activator versus Trainer: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2019;41:21–8.IdrisGHajeerMYAl-JundiA.Soft-and hard-tissue changes following treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion with Activator versus Trainer: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2019;41:21–8.Search in Google Scholar
Hanoun AA, Rao GKL, Khamis MF, Mokhtar N. Efficacy of the prefabricated myofunctional appliance T4FTM in comparison to twin block appliance for Class II Division 1 malocclusion treatment: a randomized clinical trial. Malaysian J Med Health Sci. 2020;16:307–16.HanounAARaoGKLKhamisMFMokhtarN.Efficacy of the prefabricated myofunctional appliance T4FTM in comparison to twin block appliance for Class II Division 1 malocclusion treatment: a randomized clinical trial. Malaysian J Med Health Sci. 2020;16:307–16.Search in Google Scholar
Habumugisha J, Cheng B, Ma SY, Zhao MY, Bu WQ, Wang GL, et al. A non-randomized concurrent controlled trial of myofunctional treatment in the mixed dentition children with functional mouth breathing assessed by cephalometric radiographs and study models. BMC Pediatr. 2022;22:506.HabumugishaJChengBMaSYZhaoMYBuWQWangGLA non-randomized concurrent controlled trial of myofunctional treatment in the mixed dentition children with functional mouth breathing assessed by cephalometric radiographs and study models. BMC Pediatr. 2022;22:506.Search in Google Scholar
Ramirez-Yañez GSA, Junior E, Fluter J. Dimensional changes in dental arches after treatment with a prefabricated functional appliance. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2007;31:279–83.Ramirez-YañezGSAJuniorEFluterJ.Dimensional changes in dental arches after treatment with a prefabricated functional appliance. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2007;31:279–83.Search in Google Scholar
Elhamouly Y, El-Housseiny AA, Ismail HA, Habashy LME. Myofunctional Trainer versus Twin Block in developing Class II Division I malocclusion: a randomized comparative clinical trial. Dent J (Basel). 2020;8:44.ElhamoulyYEl-HousseinyAAIsmailHAHabashyLME.Myofunctional Trainer versus Twin Block in developing Class II Division I malocclusion: a randomized comparative clinical trial. Dent J (Basel). 2020;8:44.Search in Google Scholar
Ji LZY, Chen L, He Y, Yao Y, Chen F. Comparison of efficacy between MRC and the Twin-block appliance in treating class II malocclusion. J Tongji Univ Med Sci. 2020;41:84–9.JiLZYChenLHeYYaoYChenF.Comparison of efficacy between MRC and the Twin-block appliance in treating class II malocclusion. J Tongji Univ Med Sci. 2020;41:84–9.Search in Google Scholar
Chen JJ, Qi J, Yuan JY, Zhao H. Efficacy analysis of Twin-block treatment for skeletal Class II during the growth spurt with oral breathing. Med Res Educ. 2021;38:12–7.ChenJJQiJYuanJYZhaoH.Efficacy analysis of Twin-block treatment for skeletal Class II during the growth spurt with oral breathing. Med Res Educ. 2021;38:12–7.Search in Google Scholar
Cirgic E, Kjellberg H, Hansen K. Treatment of large overjet in Angle Class II: division 1 malocclusion with Andresen activators versus prefabricated functional appliances—a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38:516–24.CirgicEKjellbergHHansenK.Treatment of large overjet in Angle Class II: division 1 malocclusion with Andresen activators versus prefabricated functional appliances—a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38:516–24.Search in Google Scholar
Čirgić E, Kjellberg H, Hansen K, Lepp M. Adolescents’ experiences of using removable functional appliances. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015;18:165–74.ČirgićEKjellbergHHansenKLeppM.Adolescents’ experiences of using removable functional appliances. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015;18:165–74.Search in Google Scholar
Johnson JS, Satyaprasad S, Sharath Chandra H, Havaldar KS, Raj A, Suresh N. A comparative evaluation of the dentoskeletal treatment effects using twin block appliance and myobrace system on Class II Division I malocclusion. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(Suppl 1):S10–s7.JohnsonJSSatyaprasadSSharath ChandraHHavaldarKSRajASureshN.A comparative evaluation of the dentoskeletal treatment effects using twin block appliance and myobrace system on Class II Division I malocclusion. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(Suppl 1):S10–s7.Search in Google Scholar
Cirgic E, Kjellberg H, Petzold M, Hansen K. A cost-minimization analysis of large overjet reduction with two removable functional appliances based on a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2018;40:437–43.CirgicEKjellbergHPetzoldMHansenK.A cost-minimization analysis of large overjet reduction with two removable functional appliances based on a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2018;40:437–43.Search in Google Scholar
Khazal A, Alhafidh N, Hassan L. Pre-orthodontic myofunctional Trainers appliance system: a review. Al-Rafidain Dent J. 2022;22:46–55.KhazalAAlhafidhNHassanL.Pre-orthodontic myofunctional Trainers appliance system: a review. Al-Rafidain Dent J. 2022;22:46–55.Search in Google Scholar
Zhang CX, Shen G, Ning YJ, Liu H, Zhao Y, Liu DX. Effects of Twin-block vs sagittal-guidance Twin-block appliance on alveolar bone around mandibular incisors in growing patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;157:329–39.ZhangCXShenGNingYJLiuHZhaoYLiuDX.Effects of Twin-block vs sagittal-guidance Twin-block appliance on alveolar bone around mandibular incisors in growing patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;157:329–39.Search in Google Scholar
Hu H, Lin W, Wu J, Xu H. Research on the correlation between the size of condyle and occlusion plane in skeletal Class II malocclusions. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022;8:1547–54.HuHLinWWuJXuH.Research on the correlation between the size of condyle and occlusion plane in skeletal Class II malocclusions. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022;8:1547–54.Search in Google Scholar
Verma S, Mehta F, Alam MK, Parekh HA, Ahmed VKS, Jain C. Class II malocclusion treatment by in-house fabricated, customized fixed functional appliance in growing child. Case Rep Dent. 2022;2022:8102482.VermaSMehtaFAlamMKParekhHAAhmedVKSJainC.Class II malocclusion treatment by in-house fabricated, customized fixed functional appliance in growing child. Case Rep Dent. 2022;2022:8102482.Search in Google Scholar
Čirgić E, Kjellberg H, Hansen K. Treatment of large overjet in Angle Class II: division 1 malocclusion with Andresen activators versus prefabricated functional appliances-a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38:516–24.ČirgićEKjellbergHHansenK.Treatment of large overjet in Angle Class II: division 1 malocclusion with Andresen activators versus prefabricated functional appliances-a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38:516–24.Search in Google Scholar
Parekh J, Counihan K, Fleming PS, Pandis N, Sharma PK. Effectiveness of part-time vs full-time wear protocols of Twin-block appliance on dental and skeletal changes: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;155:165–72.ParekhJCounihanKFlemingPSPandisNSharmaPK.Effectiveness of part-time vs full-time wear protocols of Twin-block appliance on dental and skeletal changes: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;155:165–72.Search in Google Scholar
Mohammed H, Čirgić E, Rizk MZ, Vandevska-Radunovic V. Effectiveness of prefabricated myofunctional appliances in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2020;42:125–34.MohammedHČirgićERizkMZVandevska-RadunovicV.Effectiveness of prefabricated myofunctional appliances in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2020;42:125–34.Search in Google Scholar
Papageorgiou SN, Koletsi D, Eliades T. What evidence exists for myofunctional therapy with prefabricated appliances? A systematic review with meta-analyses of randomised trials. J Orthod. 2019;46:297–310.PapageorgiouSNKoletsiDEliadesT.What evidence exists for myofunctional therapy with prefabricated appliances? A systematic review with meta-analyses of randomised trials. J Orthod. 2019;46:297–310.Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE. Facial and dental changes in adolescents and their clinical implications. Angle Orthod. 2000;70: 471–83.BisharaSE.Facial and dental changes in adolescents and their clinical implications. Angle Orthod. 2000;70: 471–83.Search in Google Scholar
Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, Colombo A, Ciusa V. Soft tissue facial growth and development as assessed by the three-dimensional computerized mesh diagram analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116:215–28.FerrarioVFSforzaCSerraoGColomboACiusaV.Soft tissue facial growth and development as assessed by the three-dimensional computerized mesh diagram analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116:215–28.Search in Google Scholar