This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Nienkemper M, Wilmes B, Panayotidis A, et al. Measurement of mini-implant stability using resonance frequency analysis. Angle Orthod. 2013;83(2):230-8.NienkemperMWilmesBPanayotidisAMeasurement of mini-implant stability using resonance frequency analysis..2013;83(2):230-8.Search in Google Scholar
Liou EJ, Pai BC, Lin JC. Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces?AmJ Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126(1):42-7.LiouEJPaiBCLinJC.Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces?.2004;126(1):42-7.Search in Google Scholar
Park H-S, Kwon O-W, Sung J-H. Nonextraction treatment of an open bite with microscrew implant anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130(3):391-402.ParkH-SKwonO-WSungJ-H.Nonextraction treatment of an open bite with microscrew implant anchorage..2006;130(3):391-402.Search in Google Scholar
Chen YJ, Chang HH, Lin HY, Lai EHH, Hung HC, Yao CCJ. Stability of miniplates and miniscrews used for orthodontic anchorage: experience with 492 temporary anchorage devices. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(11):1188-96.ChenYJChangHHLinHYLaiEHHHungHCYaoCCJ.Stability of miniplates and miniscrews used for orthodontic anchorage: experience with 492 temporary anchorage devices..2008;19(11):1188-96.Search in Google Scholar
Nucera R, Lo Giudice A, Bellocchio AM, et al. Bone and cortical bone thickness of mandibular buccal shelf for mini-screw insertion in adults. Angle Orthod. 2017;87(5):745-51.NuceraRLo GiudiceABellocchioAMBone and cortical bone thickness of mandibular buccal shelf for mini-screw insertion in adults..2017;87(5):745-51.Search in Google Scholar
Pauwels R, Jacobs R, Singer SR, Mupparapu M. CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable? Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2015;44(1):20140238.PauwelsRJacobsRSingerSRMupparapuM.CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable?.2015;44(1):20140238.Search in Google Scholar
Mah P, Reeves T, McDavid W. Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2010;39(6):323-35.MahPReevesTMcDavidW.Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography..2010;39(6):323-35.Search in Google Scholar
Vargas EOA, de Lima RL, Nojima LI. Mandibular buccal shelf and infrazygomatic crest thicknesses in patients with different vertical facial heights. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;158(3):349-56.VargasEOAde LimaRLNojimaLI.Mandibular buccal shelf and infrazygomatic crest thicknesses in patients with different vertical facial heights..2020;158(3):349-56.Search in Google Scholar
Gandhi V, Upadhyay M, Tadinada A, Yadav S. Variability associated with mandibular buccal shelf area width and height in subjects with different growth pattern, sex, and growth status. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021;159(1):59-70.GandhiVUpadhyayMTadinadaAYadavS.Variability associated with mandibular buccal shelf area width and height in subjects with different growth pattern, sex, and growth status..2021;159(1):59-70.Search in Google Scholar
Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara Jr JA. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Paper presented at: Seminars in Orthodontics; 2005BaccettiTFranchiLMcNamaraJA.JrThe cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics.;2005Search in Google Scholar
Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod. 1953;39(10):729-55.SteinerCC.Cephalometrics for you and me..1953;39(10):729-55.Search in Google Scholar
Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharmaceutical Statistics. 2007;17(4):571-82.BlandJMAltmanDG.Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual..2007;17(4):571-82.Search in Google Scholar
Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Statistical Methods Med Biol Students. 1940;98:122-32.DahlbergG.Statistical methods for medical and biological students..1940;98:122-32.Search in Google Scholar
Razi T, Niknami M, Ghazani FA. Relationship between Hounsfield unit in CT scan and gray scale in CBCT. J Dental Res, Denta l Clin Dental Prospects. 2014;8(2):107.RaziTNiknamiMGhazaniFA.Relationship between Hounsfield unit in CT scan and gray scale in CBCT..2014;8(2):107.Search in Google Scholar
Valiyaparambil JV, Yamany I, Ortiz D, et al. Bone qual ity evaluation: comparison of cone beam computed tomography and subjective surgical assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 2012;27(5):1271-7.ValiyaparambilJVYamanyIOrtizDBone qual ity evaluation: comparison of cone beam computed tomography and subjective surgical assessment..2012;27(5):1271-7.Search in Google Scholar
Matias M, Flores-Mir C, de Almeida MR, et al. Miniscrew insertion sites of infrazygomatic crest and mandibular buccal shelf in different vertical craniofacial patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Kor J Orthod. 2021;51(6):387-96.MatiasMFlores-MirCde AlmeidaMRMiniscrew insertion sites of infrazygomatic crest and mandibular buccal shelf in different vertical craniofacial patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study..2021;5(6):387-96.Search in Google Scholar
Rossi M, Bruno G, De Stefani A, Perri A, Gracco A. Quantitative CBCT evaluation of maxillary and mandibular cortical bone thickness and density variability for orthodontic miniplate placement. Int Orthod. 2017;15(4):610-24.RossiMBrunoGDe StefaniAPerriAGraccoA.Quantitative CBCT evaluation of maxillary and mandibular cortical bone thickness and density variability for orthodontic miniplate placement..2017;15(4):610-24.Search in Google Scholar
Oktay H. The study of the maxillary sinus areas in different orthodontic malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;102(2):143-5.OktayH.The study of the maxillary sinus areas in different orthodontic malocclusions..1992;102(2):143-5.Search in Google Scholar
Nimigean V, Nimigean VR, Măru N, Sălăvăstru D, Bădiţă D, Tuculină MJ. The maxillary sinus floor in the oral implantology. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2008;49(4):485-9.NimigeanVNimigeanVRMăruNSălăvăstruDBădiţăDTuculinăMJ.The maxillary sinus floor in the oral implantology..2008;49(4):485-9.Search in Google Scholar
Marquezan M, Souza MMGd, Araújo MTdS, Nojima LI, Nojima MdCG. Is miniscrew primary stability influenced by bone density? Braz Oral Res. 2011;25:427-32.MarquezanMSouzaMMGdAraújoMTdSNojimaLINojimaMdCG.Is miniscrew primary stability influenced by bone density?.2011;25:427-32.Search in Google Scholar
Todor BI, Scrobota I, Todor L, Lucan AI, Vaida LL. Environmental factors associated with malocclusion in children population from Mining Areas, Western Romania. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(18):3383.TodorBIScrobotaITodorLLucanAIVaidaLL.Environmental factors associated with malocclusion in children population from Mining Areas, Western Romania..2019;16(18):3383.Search in Google Scholar
Thompson G, Popovich F. Static and dynamic analyses of gonial angle size. Angle Orthod. 1974;44(3):227-34.ThompsonGPopovichF.Static and dynamic analyses of gonial angle size..1974;44(3):227-34.Search in Google Scholar
Aleluia RB, Duplat CB, Crusoé-Rebello I, Neves FS. Assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for orthodontic anchorage: Influence of side, gender and skeletal patterns. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2021;24:83-91.AleluiaRBDuplatCBCrusoé-RebelloINevesFS.Assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for orthodontic anchorage: Influence of side, gender and skeletal patterns..2021;24:83-91.Search in Google Scholar