This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Bills DA, Handelman CS, BeGole EA. Bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: traits and orthodontic correction. Angle Orthod 2005;75:333–9.BillsDAHandelmanCSBeGoleEA. Bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: traits and orthodontic correction. Angle Orthod2005;75:333–9.Search in Google Scholar
Keating PJ. Bimaxillary protrusion in the Caucasian: a cephalometric study of the morphological features. Br J Orthod 1985;12:193–201.KeatingPJ. Bimaxillary protrusion in the Caucasian: a cephalometric study of the morphological features. Br J Orthod1985;12:193–201.Search in Google Scholar
Fontinha C, Cattaneo PM, Cornelis MA. How efficient is customized lingual orthodontics? An assessment of treatment outcome. Orthod Craniofac Res 2022;25:73–81.FontinhaCCattaneoPMCornelisMA. How efficient is customized lingual orthodontics? An assessment of treatment outcome. Orthod Craniofac Res2022;25:73–81.Search in Google Scholar
Upadhyay M, Yadav S, Patil S. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:803–10.UpadhyayMYadavSPatilS. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2008;134:803–10.Search in Google Scholar
Hong RK, Heo JM, Ha YK. Lever-arm and mini-implant system for anterior torque control during retraction in lingual orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2005;75:129–41.HongRKHeoJMHaYK. Lever-arm and mini-implant system for anterior torque control during retraction in lingual orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod2005;75:129–41.Search in Google Scholar
Feng Y, Kong WD, Cen WJ, Zhou XZ, Zhang W, Li QT, et al. Finite element analysis of the effect of power arm locations on tooth movement in extraction space closure with miniscrew anchorage in customized lingual orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019;156:210–9.FengYKongWDCenWJZhouXZZhangWLiQTFinite element analysis of the effect of power arm locations on tooth movement in extraction space closure with miniscrew anchorage in customized lingual orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2019;156:210–9.Search in Google Scholar
Kojima Y, Kawamura J, Fukui H. Finite element analysis of the effect of force directions on tooth movement in extraction space closure with miniscrew sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:501–8.KojimaYKawamuraJFukuiH. Finite element analysis of the effect of force directions on tooth movement in extraction space closure with miniscrew sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2012;142:501–8.Search in Google Scholar
Leonardi R, Annunziata A, Licciardello V, Barbato E. Soft tissue changes following the extraction of premolars in nongrowing patients with bimaxillary protrusion. A systematic review. Angle Orthod 2010;80:211–6.LeonardiRAnnunziataALicciardelloVBarbatoE. Soft tissue changes following the extraction of premolars in nongrowing patients with bimaxillary protrusion. A systematic review. Angle Orthod2010;80:211–6.Search in Google Scholar
Kusnoto J, Kusnoto H. The effect of anterior tooth retraction on lip position of orthodontically treated adult Indonesians. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:304–7.KusnotoJKusnotoH. The effect of anterior tooth retraction on lip position of orthodontically treated adult Indonesians. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2001;120:304–7.Search in Google Scholar
Mattu N, Virupaksha AM, Belludi A. Comparative study of effect of different lever arm positions and lengths on transverse and vertical bowing in lingual orthodontics—An FEM study. Int Orthod 2021;19:281–90.MattuNVirupakshaAMBelludiA. Comparative study of effect of different lever arm positions and lengths on transverse and vertical bowing in lingual orthodontics—An FEM study. Int Orthod2021;19:281–90.Search in Google Scholar
Inami T, Ito G, Miyazawa K, Tabuchi M, Goto S. Ribbon-wise customized lingual appliance and orthodontic anchor screw for the treatment of skeletal high-angle maxillary protrusion without bowing effect. Angle Orthod 2018;88:830–40.InamiTItoGMiyazawaKTabuchiMGotoS. Ribbon-wise customized lingual appliance and orthodontic anchor screw for the treatment of skeletal high-angle maxillary protrusion without bowing effect. Angle Orthod2018;88:830–40.Search in Google Scholar
Grauer D, Proffit WR. Accuracy in tooth positioning with a fully customized lingual orthodontic appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:433–43.GrauerDProffitWR. Accuracy in tooth positioning with a fully customized lingual orthodontic appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2011;140:433–43.Search in Google Scholar
Long H, Zhou Y, Pyakurel U, Liao L, Jian F, Xue J, et al. Comparison of adverse effects between lingual and labial orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2013;83:1066–73.LongHZhouYPyakurelULiaoLJianFXueJComparison of adverse effects between lingual and labial orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod2013;83:1066–73.Search in Google Scholar
Grauer D. Quality in orthodontics: the role of customized appliances. J Esthet Restor Dent 2021;33:253–8.GrauerD. Quality in orthodontics: the role of customized appliances. J Esthet Restor Dent2021;33:253–8.Search in Google Scholar
El Khoury T, Karam R, Dib E, Kaddah F, Mhanna A, Ghosn N, et al. Three-dimensional comparison of the effects of sliding mechanics in labial and lingual orthodontics using the finite element method. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2022;162: 24–32.El KhouryTKaramRDibEKaddahFMhannaAGhosnNThree-dimensional comparison of the effects of sliding mechanics in labial and lingual orthodontics using the finite element method. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2022;162: 24–32.Search in Google Scholar
Lawson RB. Extraction treatment in lingual orthodontics. J Orthod 2013;40 (Suppl 1): S38–48.LawsonRB. Extraction treatment in lingual orthodontics. J Orthod2013;40(Suppl 1): S38–48.Search in Google Scholar
Ghannam M, Kamiloglu B. Effects of skeletally supported anterior en masse retraction with varied lever arm lengths and locations in lingual orthodontic treatment: a 3D finite element study. Biomed Res Int 2021;2021:9975428.GhannamMKamilogluB. Effects of skeletally supported anterior en masse retraction with varied lever arm lengths and locations in lingual orthodontic treatment: a 3D finite element study. Biomed Res Int2021;2021:9975428.Search in Google Scholar
Inami T, Nakano Y, Miyazawa K, Tabuchi M, Goto S. Adult skeletal Class II high-angle case treated with a fully customized lingual bracket appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;150:679–91.InamiTNakanoYMiyazawaKTabuchiMGotoS. Adult skeletal Class II high-angle case treated with a fully customized lingual bracket appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2016;150:679–91.Search in Google Scholar
Papageorgiou SN, Gölz L, Jäger A, Eliades T, Bourauel C. Lingual vs. labial fixed orthodontic appliances: systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment effects. Eur J Oral Sci 2016;124: 105–18.PapageorgiouSNGölzLJägerAEliadesTBourauelC. Lingual vs. labial fixed orthodontic appliances: systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment effects. Eur J Oral Sci2016;124: 105–18.Search in Google Scholar
Hong RK, Ahn JH. Correction of a gummy smile and lip protrusion by orthodontic retreatment with lingual appliances and temporary skeletal anchorage devices. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2021;160:603–16.HongRKAhnJH. Correction of a gummy smile and lip protrusion by orthodontic retreatment with lingual appliances and temporary skeletal anchorage devices. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2021;160:603–16.Search in Google Scholar
Aras I, Tuncer AV. Comparison of anterior and posterior mini-implant-assisted maxillary incisor intrusion: root resorption and treatment efficiency. Angle Orthod 2016;86:746–52.ArasITuncerAV. Comparison of anterior and posterior mini-implant-assisted maxillary incisor intrusion: root resorption and treatment efficiency. Angle Orthod2016;86:746–52.Search in Google Scholar