This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Bearn DR, Aird JC, McCabe JF. Ex vivo bond strength of adhesive precoated metallic and ceramic brackets. Br J Orthod 1995;22:233–236.BearnDRAirdJCMcCabeJFEx vivo bond strength of adhesive precoated metallic and ceramic bracketsBr J Orthod19952223323610.1179/bjo.22.3.2337577872Search in Google Scholar
Bin Abdullah MS, Rock WP. The effect of etch time and debond interval upon the shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets. Br J Orthod 1996;23:121–124.Bin AbdullahMSRockWPThe effect of etch time and debond interval upon the shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic bracketsBr J Orthod19962312112410.1179/bjo.23.2.1218771335Search in Google Scholar
Ozer M, Arici S. Sandblasted metal brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement in vivo. Angle Orthod 2005;75:406–409.OzerMAriciSSandblasted metal brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement in vivoAngle Orthod200575406409Search in Google Scholar
Banks P, Elton V, Jones Y, Rice P, Derwent S, Odondi L. The use of fixed appliances in the UK: a survey of specialist orthodontists. J Orthod 2010;3:43–55.BanksPEltonVJonesYRicePDerwentSOdondiLThe use of fixed appliances in the UK: a survey of specialist orthodontistsJ Orthod20103435510.1179/1465312104286720439926Search in Google Scholar
Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo U, Migliau G. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2017;8:1–17.SofanESofanAPalaiaGTenoreGRomeoUMigliauGClassification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal typeAnn Stomatol (Roma)2017811710.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001550716128736601Search in Google Scholar
Cochrane NJ, Lo TWG, Adams GG, Schneider PM. Quantitative analysis of enamel on debonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;152:312–319.CochraneNJLoTWGAdamsGGSchneiderPMQuantitative analysis of enamel on debonded orthodontic bracketsAm J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop201715231231910.1016/j.ajodo.2017.01.02028863911Search in Google Scholar
Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J 1972;132:133–135.WilsonADKentBEA new translucent cement for dentistryThe glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J197213213313510.1038/sj.bdj.48028104501690Search in Google Scholar
Burgess JO, Barghi N, Chan DC, Hummert T. A comparative study of three glass ionomer base materials. Am J Dent 1993;6:137–141.BurgessJOBarghiNChanDCHummertTA comparative study of three glass ionomer base materialsAm J Dent19936137141Search in Google Scholar
Rogers S, Chadwick B, Treasure E. Fluoride-containing orthodontic adhesives and decalcification in patients with fixed appliances: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:390.e1–390.e8.RogersSChadwickBTreasureEFluoride-containing orthodontic adhesives and decalcification in patients with fixed appliances: a systematic reviewAm J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2010138390.e1390.e810.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.02520889037Search in Google Scholar
Tuncer C, Tuncer BB, Ulusoy C. Effect of fluoride-releasing light-cured resin on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:14.e1–14.e6.TuncerCTuncerBBUlusoyCEffect of fluoride-releasing light-cured resin on shear bond strength of orthodontic bracketsAm J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop200913514.e114.e610.1016/j.ajodo.2008.09.01619121495Search in Google Scholar
Marcusson A, Norevall LL, Persson M. White spot reduction when using glass ionomer cement for bonding in orthodontics: a longitudinal and comparative study. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:233–242.MarcussonANorevallLLPerssonMWhite spot reduction when using glass ionomer cement for bonding in orthodontics: a longitudinal and comparative studyEur J Orthod19971923324210.1093/ejo/19.3.2339239953Search in Google Scholar
Paschos E, Kleinschrodt T, Clementino-Luedemann T, Huth KC, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH, et al. Effect of different bonding agents on prevention of enamel demineralisation around orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac 2009;135:603–612.PaschosEKleinschrodtTClementino-LuedemannTHuthKCHickelRKunzelmannKHetalEffect of different bonding agents on prevention of enamel demineralisation around orthodontic bracketsAm J Orthod Dentofac200913560361210.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.02819409343Search in Google Scholar
Uysal T, Amasyali M, Ozcan S, Koyuturk AE, Sahgdic D. Effect of antibacterial monomer-containing adhesive on enamel demineralisation around orthodontic brackets: an in-vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:650–656.UysalTAmasyaliMOzcanSKoyuturkAESahgdicDEffect of antibacterial monomer-containing adhesive on enamel demineralisation around orthodontic brackets: an in-vivo studyAm J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop201113965065610.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.03821536208Search in Google Scholar
Gcaustralia.com [Internet]. Australia: GC Fuji II Capsule; c2017 [cited 2020 4 May GC]. Available from: http://www.gcaustralasia.com/Products/4/Glass-Ionomer/GC-Fuji-II-LC-CAPSULE.Gcaustralia.com [Internet]. Australia: GC Fuji II Capsule; c2017 [cited 2020 4 May GC]Available fromhttp://www.gcaustralasia.com/Products/4/Glass-Ionomer/GC-Fuji-II-LC-CAPSULESearch in Google Scholar
Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V, Banerjee A. Retention of orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified GIC versus composite resin adhesives—a quantitative systematic review of clinical trials. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:1–14.MickenautschSYengopalVBanerjeeARetention of orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified GIC versus composite resin adhesives—a quantitative systematic review of clinical trialsClin Oral Investig20121611410.1007/s00784-011-0626-822006128Search in Google Scholar
Foster JA, Berzins DW, Bradley TG. Bond strength of an amorphous calcium phosphate–containing orthodontic adhesive. Angle Orthod 2008;78:339–344.FosterJABerzinsDWBradleyTGBond strength of an amorphous calcium phosphate–containing orthodontic adhesiveAngle Orthod20087833934410.2319/020807-6018251600Search in Google Scholar
Kohda N, Iijima M, Brantley W, Muguruma T, Yuasa T, Nakagaki S. Effects of bonding materials on the mechanical properties of enamel around orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2011;82:187–195.KohdaNIijimaMBrantleyWMugurumaTYuasaTNakagakiSEffects of bonding materials on the mechanical properties of enamel around orthodontic bracketsAngle Orthod20118218719510.2319/020411-78.1886794221827232Search in Google Scholar
Feizbakhsh M, Aslani F, Gharizadeh N, Heidarizadeh M. Comparison of bracket bond strength to etched and unetched enamel under dry and wet conditions using Fuji Ortho LC glass-ionomer. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2017;11:30.FeizbakhshMAslaniFGharizadehNHeidarizadehMComparison of bracket bond strength to etched and unetched enamel under dry and wet conditions using Fuji Ortho LC glass-ionomerJ Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects2017113010.15171/joddd.2017.006539012328413593Search in Google Scholar
Fricker JP. A 12-month clinical evaluation of a light activated glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105:502–505.FrickerJPA 12-month clinical evaluation of a light activated glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic bracketsAm J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop199410550250510.1016/S0889-5406(94)70012-58166101Search in Google Scholar
Hegarty DJ, Macfarlane TV. In vivo bracket retention comparison of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a resin-based bracket adhesive system after a year. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:496–501.HegartyDJMacfarlaneTVIn vivo bracket retention comparison of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a resin-based bracket adhesive system after a yearAm J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop200212149650110.1067/mod.2002.12236712045767Search in Google Scholar
Ireland AJ, Sherriff M. The effect of pumicing on the in vivo use of resin modified glass poly(alkenoate) cement and a conventional no-mix composite for bonding orthodontic brackets. J Orthod 2002;29:217–220.IrelandAJSherriffMThe effect of pumicing on the in vivo use of resin modified glass poly(alkenoate) cement and a conventional no-mix composite for bonding orthodontic bracketsJ Orthod20022921722010.1093/ortho/29.3.21712218200Search in Google Scholar
Shirazi M, Tamadon M, Izadi M. Effect of addition of bioactive glass to resin modified glass ionomer cement on enamel demineralization under orthodontic brackets. J Clin Exp Dent 2019;11:e521–e526.ShiraziMTamadonMIzadiMEffect of addition of bioactive glass to resin modified glass ionomer cement on enamel demineralization under orthodontic bracketsJ Clin Exp Dent201911e521e52610.4317/jced.55576664526731346371Search in Google Scholar
Espinosa R, Valencia R, Uribe M, Ceja I, Saadia M. Enamel deproteinization and its effect on acid etching: an in vitro study. J Clin Ped Dent 2008;33:13–19.EspinosaRValenciaRUribeMCejaISaadiaMEnamel deproteinization and its effect on acid etching: an in vitro studyJ Clin Ped Dent200833131910.17796/jcpd.33.1.ng5462w5746j766p19093646Search in Google Scholar
Justus R, Cubero T, Ondarza R, Morales F. A New Technique in with Sodium Hypochlorite to Increase Bracket Shear Bond Strength of Fluoride-releasing resin-modified glass ionomer cements: Comparing shear bond strength of two adhesive systems with enamel surface deproteinization before etching. Semin Orthod 2010;16:66–75.JustusRCuberoTOndarzaRMoralesFA New Technique in with Sodium Hypochlorite to Increase Bracket Shear Bond Strength of Fluoride-releasing resin-modified glass ionomer cements: Comparing shear bond strength of two adhesive systems with enamel surface deproteinization before etchingSemin Orthod201016667510.1053/j.sodo.2009.12.006Search in Google Scholar
Jurišić S, Jurišić G, Jurić H. Influence of Adhesives and Methods of Enamel Pretreatment on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets. Acta Stomatologica Croatica 2015;49:269.JurišićSJurišićGJurićHInfluence of Adhesives and Methods of Enamel Pretreatment on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic BracketsActa Stomatologica Croatica20154926910.15644/asc49/4/1494533227688410Search in Google Scholar
Pereira TBJ, Jansen WC, Pithon MM, Souki BQ, Tanaka OM, Oliveira DD. Effects of enamel deproteinization on bracket bonding with conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Eur J Orthod 2013;35:442–446.PereiraTBJJansenWCPithonMMSoukiBQTanakaOMOliveiraDDEffects of enamel deproteinization on bracket bonding with conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cementsEur J Orthod20133544244610.1093/ejo/cjs00622379131Search in Google Scholar
Chen AK. Bonding failure of resin-modified glass ionomer cement on sodium hypochlorite conditioned enamel: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. DCD Thesis University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. Unpublished results.ChenAKBonding failure of resin-modified glass ionomer cement on sodium hypochlorite conditioned enamel: a split-mouth randomized clinical trialDCD Thesis University of Melbourne,Melbourne, Australia.Unpublished resultsSearch in Google Scholar
Reynolds I. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975;2:171–178.ReynoldsIA review of direct orthodontic bondingBr J Orthod1975217117810.1080/0301228X.1975.11743666Search in Google Scholar
Khan AS, Syed MR. A review of bioceramics-based dental restorative materials. Dent Mater J 2019;38:163–176.KhanASSyedMRA review of bioceramics-based dental restorative materialsDent Mater J20193816317610.4012/dmj.2018-03930381635Search in Google Scholar
Valente RM, de Rijk WG, Drummond JL, Evans CA. Etching conditions for resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac 2002;121:516–520.ValenteRMde RijkWGDrummondJLEvansCAEtching conditions for resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bracketsAm J Orthod Dentofac200212151652010.1067/mod.2002.12216512045770Search in Google Scholar
Elnafar AA, Alam MK, Hasan R. The impact of surface preparation on shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement. J Orthod 2014;41:201–207.ElnafarAAAlamMKHasanRThe impact of surface preparation on shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cementJ Orthod20144120120710.1179/1465313314Y.000000009725143559Search in Google Scholar
Benson PE, Shah AA, Millett DT, Dyer F, Parkin N, Vine RS. Fluorides, orthodontics and demineralization: a systematic review. J Orthod 2005;32:102–114.BensonPEShahAAMillettDTDyerFParkinNVineRSFluorides, orthodontics and demineralization: a systematic reviewJ Orthod20053210211410.1179/14653120522502103315994984Search in Google Scholar
Shungin D, Olsson AI, Persson M. Orthodontic treatment-related white spot lesions: A 14-year prospective quantitative follow-up, including bonding material assessment. Am J Orthod Dentofac 2010;138:136.e1–136.e8.ShunginDOlssonAIPerssonMOrthodontic treatment-related white spot lesions: A 14-year prospective quantitative follow-up, including bonding material assessmentAm J Orthod Dentofac2010138136.e1136.e810.1016/j.ajodo.2009.05.02020691346Search in Google Scholar
