This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Broadbent BH. A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1931;1:45–66.BroadbentBH. A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod1931;1:45–66.Search in Google Scholar
Kumar V, Ludlow J, Mol A, Cevidanes L. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Dentomaxillofac Rad 2007;36:263–269.KumarVLudlowJMolACevidanesL. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Dentomaxillofac Rad2007;36:263–269.10.1259/dmfr/9803235617586852Search in Google Scholar
Williams FLE, Richtsmeier JT. Comparison of mandibular landmarks from computed tomography and 3D digitizer data. Clin Anat 2003;16:494–500.WilliamsFLERichtsmeierJT. Comparison of mandibular landmarks from computed tomography and 3D digitizer data. Clin Anat2003;16:494–500.10.1002/ca.1009514566895Search in Google Scholar
Pinsky H, Dyda S, Pinsky R, Misch K, Sarment D. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Rad 2006;35:410–416.PinskyHDydaSPinskyRMischKSarmentD. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Rad2006;35:410–416.10.1259/dmfr/2098764817082331Search in Google Scholar
Silva MAG, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Bumann A, Visser H, Hirsch E. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofac 2008;133:640.e641–640. e645.SilvaMAGWolfUHeinickeFBumannAVisserHHirschE. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofac2008;133:640.e641–640. e645.10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.01918456133Search in Google Scholar
Zamora N, Llamas JM, Cibrián R, Gandia JL, Paredes V. Cephalometric measurements from 3D reconstructed images compared with conventional 2D images. Angle Orthod 2011;81:856–864.ZamoraNLlamasJMCibriánRGandiaJLParedesV. Cephalometric measurements from 3D reconstructed images compared with conventional 2D images. Angle Orthod2011;81:856–864.10.2319/121210-717.1891619121469969Search in Google Scholar
Mingming WU, Liu Z, Yuan F, Zhang M. Comparison of individual normal occlusion measured by CBCT images and lateral cephalograms. Stomatology 2016;36:523–527.MingmingWULiuZYuanFZhangM. Comparison of individual normal occlusion measured by CBCT images and lateral cephalograms. Stomatology2016;36:523–527.Search in Google Scholar
Li N. Study of the cone-beam CT in clinical of orthodontic diagnosis and analysis Chongqing: Chongqing Medical University Master; 2012.LiN. Study of the cone-beam CT in clinical of orthodontic diagnosis and analysisChongqing: Chongqing Medical University Master; 2012.Search in Google Scholar
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010;8:336–341.MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJAltmanDG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg2010;8:336–341.10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.00720171303Search in Google Scholar
Alsufyani N, Flores-Mir C, Major P. Three-dimensional segmentation of the upper airway using cone beam CT: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Rad 2012;41:276–284.AlsufyaniNFlores-MirCMajorP. Three-dimensional segmentation of the upper airway using cone beam CT: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Rad2012;41:276–284.10.1259/dmfr/79433138372900222517995Search in Google Scholar
Lagravere MO, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Long-term skeletal changes with rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review. Angle Orthod 2005;75:1046–1052.LagravereMOMajorPWFlores-MirC. Long-term skeletal changes with rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review. Angle Orthod2005;75:1046–1052.Search in Google Scholar
Li Y, Deng S, Mei L, Li J, Qi M, Su S. Accuracy of alveolar bone height and thickness measurements in cone beam computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med O 2019;128:667–679.LiYDengSMeiLLiJQiMSuS. Accuracy of alveolar bone height and thickness measurements in cone beam computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med O2019;128:667–679.10.1016/j.oooo.2019.05.01031311766Search in Google Scholar
Zimmerman JN, Lee J, Pliska BT. Reliability of upper pharyngeal airway assessment using dental CBCT: a systematic review. Eur J Orthodont 2017;39:489–496.ZimmermanJNLeeJPliskaBT. Reliability of upper pharyngeal airway assessment using dental CBCT: a systematic review. Eur J Orthodont2017;39:489–496.10.1093/ejo/cjw079Search in Google Scholar
Yang F, Qin H. Methodological study of CBCT 3D cephalometric applied in craniofacial growth. Journal of Wenzhou Medical College 2012;42:232–236.YangFQinH. Methodological study of CBCT 3D cephalometric applied in craniofacial growth. Journal of Wenzhou Medical College2012;42:232–236.Search in Google Scholar
Jung PK, Lee GC, Moon CH. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography cephalometric measurements using a midsagittal projection and conventional two-dimensional cephalometric measurements. Korean J Orthod 2015;45:282.JungPKLeeGCMoonCH. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography cephalometric measurements using a midsagittal projection and conventional two-dimensional cephalometric measurements. Korean J Orthod2015;45:282.10.4041/kjod.2015.45.6.282466490426629474Search in Google Scholar
Miao LI, Zhang KY, Xiaohui MA, Li SU, Wang H. Three-dimensional cephalometry of skeletal Class malformation patients. Beijing Journal of Stomatology 2016;24:323–327.MiaoLIZhangKYXiaohuiMALiSUWangH. Three-dimensional cephalometry of skeletal Class malformation patients. Beijing Journal of Stomatology2016;24:323–327.Search in Google Scholar
Wen J, Liu S, Ye X, Xie X, Li J, Li H. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities. J Am Dent Assoc 2017;12:148.WenJLiuSYeXXieXLiJLiH. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities. J Am Dent Assoc2017;12:148.10.1016/j.adaj.2017.07.03029042006Search in Google Scholar
Zhiyao LU, Qiu S, Hao J, Hanying YU, Jin Z, Chen J. 3D morphology analysis of craniofacial hard tissues of the youths with normal occlusion in Xi’an. Journal of Practical Stomatology 2016;32:372–376.ZhiyaoLUQiuSHaoJHanyingYUJinZChenJ. 3D morphology analysis of craniofacial hard tissues of the youths with normal occlusion in Xi’an. Journal of Practical Stomatology2016;32:372–376.Search in Google Scholar
Jain S, Choudhary K, Nagi R, Shukla S, Grover D. New evolution of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: Combining digital technologies. Imagng Sci Dent 2019;49:179.JainSChoudharyKNagiRShuklaSGroverD. New evolution of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: Combining digital technologies. Imagng Sci Dent2019;49:179.10.5624/isd.2019.49.3.179676106331583200Search in Google Scholar
Liu Y, Zhao J, Ding Y, Xu T. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification from cone-beam computed tomography. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2010;17:61–65.LiuYZhaoJDingYXuT. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification from cone-beam computed tomography. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi2010;17:61–65.Search in Google Scholar
J Z, S Z. Advances in the application of cone beam computed tomography in the quantitative measurement of orthodontics. Chin J Stomatol Res 2010;4:400–403.JZSZ. Advances in the application of cone beam computed tomography in the quantitative measurement of orthodontics. Chin J Stomatol Res2010;4:400–403.Search in Google Scholar
Tadinada A, Marczak A, Yadav S, Mukherjee PM. Applications of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics: A Review. Turk. J Orthod 2016;29:73–79.TadinadaAMarczakAYadavSMukherjeePM. Applications of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics: A Review. Turk. J Orthod2016;29:73–79.10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2016.011Search in Google Scholar
Rios HF, Borgnakke WS, Benavides E. The Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Management of Patients Requiring Dental Implants: An American Academy of Periodontology Best Evidence Review. J Periodontol 2017;88:946–959.RiosHFBorgnakkeWSBenavidesE. The Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Management of Patients Requiring Dental Implants: An American Academy of Periodontology Best Evidence Review. J Periodontol2017;88:946–959.10.1902/jop.2017.16054828967330Search in Google Scholar
Kapila SD, Nervina JM. CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015;44:20140282.KapilaSDNervinaJM. CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol2015;44:20140282.10.1259/dmfr.20140282427744325358833Search in Google Scholar
Guerrero ME, Noriega J, Jacobs R. Preoperative implant planning considering alveolar bone grafting needs and complication prediction using panoramic versus CBCT images. Imaging Sci Dent 2014;44:213–220.GuerreroMENoriegaJJacobsR. Preoperative implant planning considering alveolar bone grafting needs and complication prediction using panoramic versus CBCT images. Imaging Sci Dent2014;44:213–220.10.5624/isd.2014.44.3.213418235625279342Search in Google Scholar
Mendonça LM, Gaêta-Araujo H, Cruvinel PB, Tosin IW, Azenha MR, Ferraz EP. Can diagnostic changes caused by cone beam computed tomography alter the clinical decision in impacted lower third molar treatment plan. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2021;50:20200412.MendonçaLMGaêta-AraujoHCruvinelPBTosinIWAzenhaMRFerrazEP. Can diagnostic changes caused by cone beam computed tomography alter the clinical decision in impacted lower third molar treatment plan. Dentomaxillofac Radiol2021;50:20200412.10.1259/dmfr.20200412807799433197216Search in Google Scholar
Merrett SJ, Drage NA, Durning P. Cone beam computed tomography: a useful tool in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. J Orthod 2009;36:202–210.MerrettSJDrageNADurningP. Cone beam computed tomography: a useful tool in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. J Orthod2009;36:202–210.10.1179/1465312072319319741183Search in Google Scholar
Eslami E, Barkhordar H, Abramovitch K, Kim J, Masoud MI. Cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional radiography in visualization of maxillary impacted-canine localization: A systematic review of comparative studies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;151:248–258.EslamiEBarkhordarHAbramovitchKKimJMasoudMI. Cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional radiography in visualization of maxillary impacted-canine localization: A systematic review of comparative studies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2017;151:248–258.10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.07.01828153153Search in Google Scholar
Yeung A, Jacobs R, Bornstein MM. Novel low-dose protocols using cone beam computed tomography in dental medicine: a review focusing on indications, limitations, and future possibilities. Clin Oral Invest 2019;23:2573–2581.YeungAJacobsRBornsteinMM. Novel low-dose protocols using cone beam computed tomography in dental medicine: a review focusing on indications, limitations, and future possibilities. Clin Oral Invest2019;23:2573–2581.10.1007/s00784-019-02907-y31025192Search in Google Scholar
Feragalli B, Rampado O, Abate C, Macrì M, Festa F, Stromei F. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols. Radiol Med 2017;122:581–588.FeragalliBRampadoOAbateCMacrìMFestaFStromeiF. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols. Radiol Med2017;122:581–588.10.1007/s11547-017-0758-228365888Search in Google Scholar
Kissel P, Mah JK, Bumann A. Modern 3D cephalometry in pediatric orthodontics—downsizing the FOV and development of a new 3D cephalometric analysis within a minimized large FOV for dose reduction. Clin Oral Investig 2021;25:4651–4670.KisselPMahJKBumannA. Modern 3D cephalometry in pediatric orthodontics—downsizing the FOV and development of a new 3D cephalometric analysis within a minimized large FOV for dose reduction. Clin Oral Investig2021;25:4651–4670.10.1007/s00784-021-03779-x33492515Search in Google Scholar
Guerrero ME, Noriega J, Jacobs R. Preoperative implant planning considering alveolar bone grafting needs and complication prediction using panoramic versus CBCT images. Imaging Sci Dent 2014;44:213–220.GuerreroMENoriegaJJacobsR. Preoperative implant planning considering alveolar bone grafting needs and complication prediction using panoramic versus CBCT images. Imaging Sci Dent2014;44:213–220.10.5624/isd.2014.44.3.213418235625279342Search in Google Scholar
Codari M, Caffini M, Tartaglia GM, Sforza C, Baselli G. Computer-aided cephalometric landmark annotation for CBCT data. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2017;12:113–121.CodariMCaffiniMTartagliaGMSforzaCBaselliG. Computer-aided cephalometric landmark annotation for CBCT data. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg2017;12:113–121.10.1007/s11548-016-1453-927358080Search in Google Scholar
