Quantification of Ethnic Differences in Facial Profile

1 Jacobsen A. Psychological aspects of dentofacial esthetics and orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod 1984:54:18-35 Search in Google Scholar

2 Downs WB. Variation in facial relationships: Their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod 1948;34: 812-840 Search in Google Scholar

3 Legan HL, Burstone CJ. Soft-tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 1980;38:744-751 Search in Google Scholar

4 Steiner CC. The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1960; 46:721-735 Search in Google Scholar

5 Tweed CH. The Frankfort-mandibular incisor angle (FMIA) in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis. Angle Orthod 1954;24:121-169 Search in Google Scholar

6 Merrifield LL. The profile line as an aid in critically evaluating facial esthetics. Am J Orthod 1978;73:648-657 Search in Google Scholar

7 Ricketts RM. Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalon~etrics. Angle Orthod 1981;51:115-150 Search in Google Scholar

8 Moyers RE, Bookstein FL. The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics. An1 J Orthod 1979;75:599-617 Search in Google Scholar

9 Siriwat PP. Jarabak JR. Malocclusion and facial nlorphology. Is there a relationship? Angle Orthod 1985:55:127-138 Search in Google Scholar

10 Nanda SK. Patterns of vertical growth in the face, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988;93:103-116 Search in Google Scholar

11 Finnoy JP. Wisth PJ, Boe OE. Changes in soft tissue profile during and after orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 1987: 9:68-78 Search in Google Scholar

12 Holdaway R. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. An1 J Orthod 1983:84:1-28 Search in Google Scholar

13 Neger M. Newark NJ. A quantitative method for the evaluation of the soft tissue facial profile. Am J Orthod 1959: 45:-38-751 Search in Google Scholar

14 Kuhl FP, Giardina CR, Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Comp Graphics Image Proc 1982;18;236-258 Search in Google Scholar

15 Ferrario VF. Sforza C, Gianni AB. Analysis of chewing movement using elliptic Fourier descriptors. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1990;5:53-57 Search in Google Scholar

16 sic standards. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1991;6:261-269 Search in Google Scholar

17 Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A. Harmonic analysis and clustering of facial profiles. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1992;7:171-179 Search in Google Scholar

18 Vanco C, Kasai K, Sergi R, Richards LC. Townsend GC. Genetic and Environmental influences on facial profile. ADJ 1995;40:104-109 Search in Google Scholar

19 Inoue M. Fourier analysis of the forehead shape of the skull and sex determination by use of computer. Forensic Sci Int 1990;47:101-112 Search in Google Scholar

20 Halazonetis DJ, Shapiro E, Gheewalla RK, Clark E. Quantitative description of the shape of the mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991;49-56 Search in Google Scholar

21 Kapur KK, Lestrel PE, Garrett NR, Chauncey HH. The use of Fourier analysis to determine age-related changes in the facial profile. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:266-273 Search in Google Scholar

22 Lu KH. Harmonic analysis of the human face. Biometrics 1965 :491-505 Search in Google Scholar

23 O’Higgins P, Williams NW. An investigation into the use of Fourier coefficients in characterizing cranial shape in primates. J of Zoology 1987;211:409 Search in Google Scholar

24 Peck H, Peck S. A concept of facial aesthetics. Angle Orthod 1970;40:284-317 Search in Google Scholar

25 Staib LH, Duncan JS Boundary finding with parametrically deformable models. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intel 1992;14:1061-1075 Search in Google Scholar

26 Sheridan CS, Thomas CDL, Clement JG. A Fourier shape analysis study of sexual dimorphism of facial profile in adolescents and children. ADJ 1995;40:264 Search in Google Scholar

27 Richardson ER. Racial Differences in Dimensional Traits of the Human Face. Angle Orthod 1980;50:301-311 Search in Google Scholar

28 Lundstrom F, Lundstrom A. Clinical evaluation of maxillary and mandibular prognathism. Euro J Orthod 1989;11:408-413 Search in Google Scholar

29 Ricketts RM. Esthetics, environment and the law of lip relation. Am J Orthod 1968;54:272-289 Search in Google Scholar

30 Lundstrom A. Cooke MS. Proportional Analysis of the Facial Profile in Natural Head Position in Caucasian and Chinese Children. Br J Orthod 1991;18:43-49 Search in Google Scholar

31 Miura F. Inoue N. Suzuki K. Cephalometric standards for Japanese according to the Steiner analysis. Am J Orthod 1965; 51:228-295 Search in Google Scholar

32 Endo T. A study of occlusion and dentofacial pattern of a group of unselected school children in Japan. J Jpn Orthod Soc 1970;29:111-126 Search in Google Scholar

33 Yuen SWH. Hiranaka DK. A Photographic Study of the Facial Profiles of Southern Chinese Adolescents. Quint Int 1989: 20:665-676 Search in Google Scholar

34 Sushner NI. A photographic study of the soft-tissue profile of the Negro population. Am J Orthod 1977;72: 373-385 Search in Google Scholar

35 Satravala S, Schlegel KD. The significance of the integumentary profile. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1987; 92:422-426 Search in Google Scholar

36 Farkas. LG. Anthropometry of the head and face. 1994 - 2nd. edn. New York: Raven Press, 1994: Ch. 16 Search in Google Scholar