[
Altemus L A (1960): A comparison of cephalofacial relationships. Angle Orthod 30: 223-240.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beaton W D Cleall J F (1973): Cinefluorographic and cephalometric study of Class I acceptable occlusion. Amer J Orthod 64: 469-479.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berstein M Rosol M L Gianelly A A (1976): A biometric study of orthopedically directed treatment of Class II malocclusion. Amer J Orthod 70: 683-689.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bishara S E Augspurger E F (1975: The role of mandibular plane inclination in orthodontic diagnosis. Angle Orthodont 45: 273-281.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bjork A (1947): The face in profile. Sven Tandlak Tidskr Suppl 40, No. 5B.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bjork A (1950): Some biological aspects of prognathism and occlusion of the teeth. Acta Odontol Scand 9: 1-40.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cotton W N Takano W S and Wong W M (1951): The Downs analysis applied to three other ethnic groups. Angle Orthodont 21: 213-220.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Downs W B (1956) Analysis of the dento-facial profile. Angle Orthodont 26: 191-212.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gresham H (1963) A cephalometric comparison of some skeletal and denture pattern components in two groups of children with acceptable occlusions. Angle Orthodont 33: 114-119.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gresham H (1965) A comparison of skeletal and denture patterns in Australian and North American children. Austdent J 10: l-5.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gresham H (1968) Craniofacial and dento-facial components of children in England compared with a similar group of children in New Zealand and in Australia. Dent Pract 18: 315-320.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harvold E P and Hatton M E (1961): Craniofacial characteristics in a representative population, abstr. J dent Res 40: 762.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henry R G ( 1963): A study of Australian children with excellent occlusion. Austdent J. 8: 123-126.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hirsh N D (1927): Cephalic index of American born children of three foreign groups. Am J phys Anthropol 10: 79-90.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hopkins J B and Murphy J (1971) Variations in good occlusions. Angle Orthodont 41: 55-65.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Iyer V S and Lut W (1966): Cephalometric comparison of Indian and English facial profiles. Am J phys Anthopol 24: 117-126.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jacobson A (1975): The “Wits” appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthodont 67: 125-138.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaplan B A (1954): Environment and human plasticity. Am Anthrop 56: 780-800.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kowalski C J and Walker G F (1972): The use of incisal angles in the Steiner cephalometric analysis. Angle Orthodont 42: 87-95.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lande M J (1952): Growth behaviour of the human bony facial profile as revealed by serial cephalometric roentgenology. Angle Orthodont 22: 78-90.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maj G Luzi C and Lucchese P (1958): A new method of cephalometric analysis suitable for the different constitutional types of head. Dent Practitioner 8: 358-364.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miller C D (1961): Stature and build of Hawaii born youth of Japanese ancestry. Am J phys Anthopol 19: 159-171.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nanda R S (1971): Growth changes in skeletal facial profile and their significance in orthodontic diagnosis. Am J Orthodont 59: 501-513.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Palmisano R G (1968): Italians in the Australian environment. M D Sc thesis University of Sydney.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ricketts R M (1970): A foundation for cephalometric communication. Am J Orthodont 46: 330-357.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Riedel R A (1952): The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion. Angle Orthodont 22: 142-145.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steiner C C (1953) Cephalometries for you and me. Am J Orthodont 39: 729-755.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steiner C C (1959): Cephalometries in clinical practice. Angle Orthodont 29: 8-29.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taylor W H and Hitchcock H P (1966): The Alabama analysis. Am J Orthodont 52: 245-265.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tweed C H (1954): The Frankfurt Mandibular Incisor angle in orthodontic diagnosis, Treatment planning and prognosis. Angle Orthodont 24: 121-169.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Uesato G (1968): Esthetic facial balance of American Japanese. Am J Orthodont 54: 601-611.
]Search in Google Scholar
