The risk status of Polish local breeds under conservation programmes – new approach

Alderson L. (2003). Criteria for the recognition and prioritisation of breeds of special genetic importance. Anim. Genet. Res. Info., 33: 1–9.Search in Google Scholar

Alderson L. (2010). Breeds at Risk. Criteria and Classification. Report from a seminar held in London, 16–17.02.2010. Convenor.Search in Google Scholar

Bundesanstaltfür Landwirtschaftund Ernährung(BLE)(2019). Einheimische Nutztierrassen in Deutschland und Rote Liste gefährdeter Nutztierrassen 2019. https://www.genres.de/fileadmin/SITE_MASTER/content/Publikationen_IBV/buch_roteliste_2019_web.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Dobrzański J., Calik J., Krawczyk J., Szwaczkowski T. (2019). Conservation of goose genetic resources in Poland – past and present status. World. Poultry Sci. J., 75: 387–399.Search in Google Scholar

Duchev Z. (2014). New breed classification system. The new interface and the status of Implementation. ERFP WG Documentation and Information meeting, Thessaloniki, 05–06.03.2014. https://www.rfp-urope.org/fileadmin/SITE_ERFP/WG_Docu/new_breeds_class.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

FAO(2004). Secondary guidelines for the development of management plans of the animal genetic resource at the national level. FAO Publications, Rome.Search in Google Scholar

FAO (2007 a). The State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (B. Rischkowsky, D. Pilling, eds). FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Assessments. Rome.Search in Google Scholar

FAO (2007 b). Report of The International Technical Conference on Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Interlaken, Switzerland, 3–7.09.2007, Rome. http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/programmes/en/genetics/documents/Interlaken/Final_Report_en.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

FAO 2013). In vivo conservation of animal genetic resources. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines. No. 14, Rome.Search in Google Scholar

FAO (2015). The Second Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, edited by B.D. Scherf and D. Pilling. FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Assessments. Rome. Available at: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4787e/index.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Gandini G., Ollivier L., Danell B., Distl O., Georgudis A., Groeneveld E., Martyniuk E., van Arendonk J., Woolliams J. (2005). Criteria to assess the degree of endangerment of livestock breeds in Europe. Livest. Prod. Sci., 91: 173–182.Search in Google Scholar

Gicquel E., Boettcher P., Besbes B., Furre S., Fernández J., Danchin-Burge C., Berger B., Baumung R., Feijóo J.R.J., Leroy G. (2019). Impact of conservation measures on demography and genetic variability of livestock breeds. Animal, 1–11.Search in Google Scholar

Groeneveld L.F., Lenstra J.A., Eding H., Toro M.A., Scherf B., Pilling D., Negrini R., Finlay E.K., Jianlin H., Groeneveld E., Weigend S., Globaldiv Consortium(2010). Genetic diversity in farm animals – A review. Anim. Genet., 41, Suppl 1: 6–31.Search in Google Scholar

IUCN(2019). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2019-2. https://www.iucnredlist.orgSearch in Google Scholar

Krawczyk J., Calik J. (2010). Comparison of performance in five generations of laying hens from Polish conservation flocks (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk. Zoot., 37: 41–54.Search in Google Scholar

Krupiński J. (2019). Praktyczne aspekty badań projektu „Kierunki wykorzystania oraz ochrona zasobów genetycznych zwierząt gospodarskich w warunkach zrównoważonego. Konferencja „Rasy rodzime, ekologia, współpraca” (in Polish). MRiRW, 17.12.2019, Warszawa. http://www.izoo.krakow.pl/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=19&Itemid=50Search in Google Scholar

Krupiński J., Polak G. (2018). Conservation of farm animal biodiversity in the conditions of sustainable agriculture (in Polish). Prz. Hod., 5: 1–8.Search in Google Scholar

Leroy G., Mary-Huard T., Verrier E., Danvy S., Charvolin E., Danchin-Burge C. (2013). Methods to estimate effective population size using pedigree data: examples in dog, sheep, cattle and horse. Genet. Sel. Evol., 45: 1.Search in Google Scholar

Leroy G., Carroll E.L., Bruford M.W., De Woody J.A., Strand A., Waits L., Wang J. (2017). Next-generation metrics for monitoring genetic erosion within populations of conservation concern. Evol. Appl., https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.1256410.1111/eva.12564605018230026798Search in Google Scholar

Leroy G., Gicquel E., Boettcher P., Besbes B., Furre S., Fernandez J., Danchin-Burge C., Alnahhas N., Baumung R. (2019). Coancestry rate’s estimate of effective population size for genetic variability monitoring. Conserv. Genet. Res., https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-019-01092-010.1007/s12686-019-01092-0Search in Google Scholar

Loftus R., Scherf B. (1993). World watch list for domestic animal diversity. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Search in Google Scholar

Ministerodelle Politiche Agricole Alimentarie Forestali(2013). Linee guida per la conservazione e la caratterizzazione della biodiversità vegetale, animale e microbica di interesse per l’agricoltura. Piano Nazionale sulla Biodiversità di Interesse Agricolo, Inea, Roma.Search in Google Scholar

MRi RW(2012). Strategia Zrównoważonego Rozwoju Wsi, Rolnictwa i Rybactwa na lata 2012–2020. Warszawa, Poland.Search in Google Scholar

MRi RW(2013). Krajowa Strategia Zrównoważonego Użytkowania i Ochrony Zasobów Genetycznych Zwierząt Gospodarskich. Warszawa, Poland.Search in Google Scholar

Polak G. (2016). Are the breeders of native horse breeds interested in preserving the animal genetic resources? Proc. 67th EAAP, Tallin, Estonia, 29.08–02.09.2016. Book of Abstracts, 21: 582.Search in Google Scholar

Santiago E., Caballero A. (1995). Effective size of populations under selection. Genetics, 139: 1013–1030.Search in Google Scholar

Scherf B.D. (2000). World Watch List for domestic animal diversity. 3rd ed. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Search in Google Scholar

Siekierski C. (2018). The role of agriculture and rural areas in the context of the new EU multiannual financial framework for 2021–2027. Proc. VIII Int. Conf.: Family farms in the face of the challenges of sustainable development. UR, Kraków, Poland, 21.06.2018.Search in Google Scholar

Sturaro E. (2017). Socio-economic parameters for trends and risks. Report from meeting in Padova 3–4 November 2016. Beograd, 3.05.2017.Search in Google Scholar

Verrier E., Audiot A., Bertrand C., Chapuis H., Charvolin E., Danchin-Burge C., Danvy S., Gourdine J.L., Gaultier P., Guémené D., Laloë D., Lenoir H., Leroy G., Naves M., Patin S., Sabbagh M. (2015). Assessing the risk status of livestock breeds: a multi-indicator method applied to 178 French local breeds belonging to ten species. Anim. Genet. Res., Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 57: 105–118.Search in Google Scholar

Wainwright W., Ahmadi B.V., Mcvittie A., Simm G., Moran D. (2019). Prioritising support for cost effective rare breed conservation using multi-criteria decision analysis frontiers in ecology and evolution. Front. Ecol. Evol., doi: 10.3389/fevo.2019.0011010.3389/fevo.2019.00110Search in Google Scholar

Wright S. (1931). Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics, 16: 97–159.Search in Google Scholar