[Ahn D.U., Sell J.L., Jo C., Chamruspollert M., Jeffrey M.(1999). Effect of dietary conjugated linoleic acid on the quality characteristic of chicken eggs during refrigerated storage. Poultry Sci., 78: 922–928.]Search in Google Scholar
[Angelovičová M., Ševčíková V., Angelovič M., Bučko O.(2014). Comparison of two different breeding systems of laying hens in relation to egg shell quality. Sci. Pap. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol., 47: 166–171.]Search in Google Scholar
[AOCSOfficial Method Ch6–91.(1997). Determination of the composition of the sterol fraction of animal and vegetable oils and fats by TLC and capillary GLC. Methods and Recommended Practices of the AOCS, Sixth edition. Firestone D. (ed.). AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, USA, pp. 1–5.]Search in Google Scholar
[Basmacioğlu H., Ergül M.(2005). Research on the factors affecting cholesterol content and some other characteristics of eggs in laying hens. The effects of genotype and rearing system. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 29: 157–164.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biesiada-Drzazga B., Janocha A.(2009). Impact of hen breed and rearing system on the quality of eggs for consumption (in Polish). Zywn-Nauk. Technol. Ja., 3: 67–74.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bozkurt Z., Tekerli M.(2009). The effects of hen age, genotype, period and temperature of storage on egg quality. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak., 15: 517–524.]Search in Google Scholar
[Calik J.(2014). Effect of length of productive life of Rhode Island Red (R-11) hens on their performance and egg quality. Acta Sci. Pol. Zootech., 13: 39–50.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chang-Ho K., Jong-Ho S., Jae-Cheong L., Kyung-Woo L.(2014). Age-related changes in egg quality of Hy-line brown hens. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 13: 510–514.]Search in Google Scholar
[Czaja L., Gornowicz E.(2006). Effect of genome and hen’s age on table egg quality (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk. Zoot., 33: 59–70.]Search in Google Scholar
[Drabik K., Chabroszewska P., Vasiukov K., Adamczuk A., Blicharska E., Batkowska J.(2018). The influence of the breeding system on the content of heavy metals in eggs (in Polish). In: Nauki Przyrodnicze i Medyczne: Świat żywy a technologie w otoczeniu ludzi i zwierząt, pp. 93–’3102.]Search in Google Scholar
[Englmaierová M., Tůmova E., Charvátová V., Skřivan M.(2014). Effects of laying hens housing system on laying performance, egg quality characteristics, and egg microbial contamination. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 59: 345–352.]Search in Google Scholar
[Funk E.(1948). The relation of the yolk index determined in natural position to the yolk index as determined after separating the yolk from the albumen. Poultry Sci., 27: 367–367.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gerzilov V., Datkova V., Mihaylova S., Bozakova N.(2012). Effect of poultry housing systems on egg production. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 18: 953–957.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haugh R.R.(1937). The Haugh unit for measuring egg quality. The US Egg Poultry Magazine, 43: 522–573.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hidalgo A., Rossi M., Clerici F., Ratti S.(2008). A market study on the quality characteristics of eggs from different housing systems. Food Chem., 106: 1031–1038.]Search in Google Scholar
[Holt P.S., Davies R.H., Dewulf J., Gast R.K., Huwe J.K., Jones D.R., Waltman D., Willian K.R.(2011). The impact of different housing systems on egg safety and quality. Poultry Sci., 90: 251–262.]Search in Google Scholar
[ISO/FDIS 17059. Oilseeds — Extraction of oil and preparation of methyl esters of triglyceride fatty acids for analysis by gas chromatography (Rapid method).]Search in Google Scholar
[Jiang S., Cui L.Y., Hou J.F., Shi C., Ke X., Yang L.C., Ma X.P.(2014). Effects of age and dietary soybean oil level on eggshell quality, bone strength and blood biochemistry in laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci., 55: 653–661.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ketta M., Tůmova E.(2014). Differences in the eggshell quality and tibia strength in Lohmann White and Czech Hen housed in cages and on litter. Acta Fytotechn. Zootechn., 17: 75–78.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kontecka H., Nowaczewski S., Sierszuła M., Witkiewicz K.(2012). Analysis of changes in egg quality of broiler breeders during the first reproduction period. Ann. Anim. Sci., 12: 609–620.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krawczyk J., Gornowicz E.(2010). Quality of eggs from hens kept in two different free-range systems in comparison with a barn system. Arch. Geflügelk., 74: 151–157.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krawczyk J., Sokołowicz Z., Szymczyk B.(2011). Effect of housing system on cholesterol, vitamin and fatty acid content of yolk and physical characteristics of eggs from Polish native hens. Arch. Geflügelk., 75: 151–157.]Search in Google Scholar
[Küçükyılmaz K., Bozkurt M., Yamaner C., Çınar M., Çatlı A.U., Konak R.(2012). Effect of an organic and conventional rearing system on the mineral content of hen eggs. Food Chem., 132: 989–992.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ledvinka Z., Tůmová E., Englmaierová M., Podsedníček M.(2012). Egg quality of three laying hen genotypes kept in conventional cages and on litter. Arch. Geflügelk., 76: 38–43.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leśnierowski G., Kijowski J.(1995). Separation, polymer formation and antibacterial activity of lysozyme. Pol. J. Food Nut. Sci., 49: 3–16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lewko L., Gornowicz E.(2011). Effect of housing system on egg quality in laying hens. Ann. Anim. Sci., 11: 607–616.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lichovníková M., Zeman L.(2008). Effect of housing system on the calcium requirement of laying hens and on eggshell quality. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 53: 162–168.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lolli S., Hidalgo A., Alamprese C., Ferrante V., Rossi M.(2013). Layer performances, eggshell characteristics and bone strength in three different housing systems. Biotechnol. Anim. Husb., 29: 591–606.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lordelo M., Fernandes E., Bessa R.J.B., Alves S.P.(2017). Quality of eggs from different laying hen production systems, from indigenous breeds and specialty eggs. Poultry Sci., 96: 1485–1491.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matt D., Veromann E., Luik A.(2009). Effect of housing systems on biochemical composition of chicken eggs. Agron. Res., 7: 662–667.]Search in Google Scholar
[Minelli G., Sirri F., Folegatti E., Meluzzi A., Franchini A.(2007). Egg quality traits of laying hens reared in organic and conventional systems. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 6: 728–730.]Search in Google Scholar
[Odabaşi Z., Miles R.D., Balaban M.O., Portier K.M.(2007). Changes in brown eggshell color as the hen ages. Poultry Sci., 86: 356–363.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ojedapo L.O.(2013). Effect of two housing systems (cages vs deep litters) on external and internal egg characteristics of a commercial laying birds reared in derived savanna zone of Nigeria. Transnat. J. Sci. Techn., 3: 25–34.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pištěková V., Hovorka M., Večerek V., Straková E., Suchy P.(2006). The quality comparison of eggs laid by laying hens kept in battery cages and in a deep litter system. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 51: 318–325.]Search in Google Scholar
[PN-A-04018:1975/Az3(2002). Agricultural and food products. Determination of nitrogen by the Kjeldahl method and conversion to protein (Az3 change).]Search in Google Scholar
[PN-A-86509(1994). Egg products – Physicochemical tests]Search in Google Scholar
[Radu-Rusu R.M., Usturoi M.G., Leahu A., Amariei S., Radu-Rusu C.G., Vacaru-Opriş I.(2014). Chemical features, cholesterol and energy content of table hen eggs from conventional and alternative farming systems. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 44: 33–42.]Search in Google Scholar
[Roll V.F.B., Briz R.C., Levrino G.A.M.(2009). Floor versus cage rearing: effects on production, egg quality and physical condition of laying hens housed in furnished cages. Ciênc. Rural., 39: 1527–1532.]Search in Google Scholar
[Samiullah R.J.R., Chousalkar K.K.(2014). Effect of production system and flock age on egg quality and total bacterial load in commercial laying hens. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 23: 59–70.]Search in Google Scholar
[SAS(2011). User’s Guide. Statistical Analysis System Institute, Inc. CaryNorth California.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scheideler S.E., Jaroni D., Froning G.(1998). Strain and age effects on egg composition from hens fed diets rich in n-3 fatty acids. Poultry Sci., 77: 192–196.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sekeroglu A., Sarica M., Demir E., Ulutas Z., Tilki M., Saatci M., Omed H.(2010). Effects of different housing systems on some performance traits and egg qualities of laying hens. Anim. Vet. Adv., 9: 1739–1744.]Search in Google Scholar
[Singh R., Cheng K.M., Silversides F.G.(2009). Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens. Poultry Sci., 88: 256–264.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sokołowicz Z., Krawczyk J., Herbut E.(2012). Quality of eggs from organically reared laying hens during their first and second year of production (in Polish). Zywn-Nauk. Technol. Ja., 4: 185–194.]Search in Google Scholar
[Suk Y.O., Park C.(2001). Effect of breed and age of hens on the yolk to albumen ratio in two different genetic stocks. Poultry Sci., 80: 855–858.]Search in Google Scholar
[Svobodová J., Tůmová E., Englmaierová M.(2014). The effect of housing system on egg quality of Lohmann White and Czech hen. Acta Fytotechn. Zootechn., 17: 44–46.]Search in Google Scholar
[Świerczewska E., Skiba T., Sokołowska A., Noworyta-Głowacka J., Kopeć W., Korzeniowska M., Bobak L.(2005). Egg white biologically active proteins activity in relation to laying hen’s age. Proc. of XI European Symposium on the quality of eggs and egg products. Doorwerth, the Netherlands, WPSA, 23–26 May 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tauson R.(2005). Management and housing systems for layers – effects on welfare and production. World Poultry Sci. J., 61: 477–490.]Search in Google Scholar
[Trziszka T., Dobrzański Z., Skiba T., Kopeć W.(2007). Effect of breeding and housing systems of layers on egg quality and the activity of cystatin and lysozyme. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci., 57: 583–586.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vanden Brand H., Parmentier H., Kemp B.(2004). Effects of housing system (outdoor vs cages) and age of laying hens on egg characteristics. Br. Poult. Sci., 45: 745–752.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vlčková J., Tůmová E., Ketta M., Englmaierová M., Chodová D.(2018). Effect of housing system and age of laying hens on eggshell quality, microbial contamination, and penetration of microorganisms into eggs. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 63: 51–60.]Search in Google Scholar
[Voslářová E., Hanzalek Z., Večerek V., Straková E., Suchý P.(2006). Comparison between laying hen performance in the cage system and the deep litter system on a diet free from animal protein. Acta Vet. Brno, 75: 219–225.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang X.L., Zheng J.X., Ning Z.H., Qu L.J., Xu G.Y., Yang N.(2009). Laying performance and egg quality of blue-shelled layers as affected by different housing systems. Poultry Sci., 88: 1485–1492.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yilmaz A.A., Bozkurt Z.(2009). Effects of hen age, storage period and stretch film packaging on internal and external quality traits of table eggs. Sci. Pap. Anim. Sci. Biotech., 42: 462–469.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yilmaz Dikmen B., Ipek A., Şahan Ü., Sözcü A., Baycan S.C.(2017). Impact of different housing systems and age of layers on egg quality characteristics. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 41: 77–84.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zita L., Tůmová E., Štolc L.(2009). Effects of genotype, age and their interaction on egg quality in brown-egg laying hens. Acta Vet. Brno, 78: 85–91.]Search in Google Scholar
