[AACC (2011). International approved methods of analysis. 11th Ed. St. Paul, MN, USA. Andersson A.A.M., Dimberg L., Åman P., Landberg R. (2014). Recent findings on certain bioactive components in whole grain wheat and rye. J. Cereal Sci., 59: 294–311.10.1016/j.jcs.2014.01.003]Search in Google Scholar
[AOAC (2005). Association of official analytical chemists. Official methods of analysis. 18th ed. AOAC International, Washington, DC.]Search in Google Scholar
[Araujo R.C., Piresa A.V., Mourãoa G.B., Abdallab A.L., Sallamc S.M.A. (2011). Use of blanks to determine in vitro net gas and methane production when using rumen fermentation modifiers. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 166–167: 155–162.10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Benninghoff J., Paschke-Beese M., Südekum K.H. (2015). In situ and in vitro ruminal degradation of maize grain and untreated or xylose-treated wheat, barley and rye grains. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 210: 86–93.10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.10.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Bertipaglia L.M.A., Fondevila M., van Laar H., Castrillo C. (2010). Effect of pelleting and pellet size of a concentrate for intensively reared beef cattle on in vitro fermentation by two different approaches. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 159: 88–95.10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.05.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Crowe T.C., Seligman S.A., Copeland L. (2000). Inhibition of enzymic digestion of amylose by free fatty acids in vitro contributes to resistant starch formation. J. Nutr., 130: 2006–2008.10.1093/jn/130.8.2006]Search in Google Scholar
[Englyst H.N., Cummings J.H. (1984). Simplified method for the measurement of total non-starch polysaccharides by gas-liquid chromatography of constituent sugars as alditol acetates. Analyst, 109: 937–942.10.1039/an9840900937]Search in Google Scholar
[Faisant N., Planchot V., Kozlowski F., Pacourent M.P., Colonna P., Champ M. (1995). Resistant starch of determination adapted to products containing high level of resistant starch. Sci. Alim., 15: 83–89.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goering H.K., Van Soest P.J. (1970). Forage fibre analysis. In: Agricultural Handbook No. 379. Agricultural Research service, USDA, Washington, DC, 20 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grajewski J., Błajet-Kosicka A., Twarużek M., Kosicki R. (2012). Occurrence of mycotoxins in Polish animal feed in years 2006–2009. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 95: 870–877.10.1111/j.1439-0396.2012.01280.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoseney R.C. (1994). Principles of cereal science and technology. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Knowlton K.F., Glenn B.P., Erdman R.A. (1998). Performance, ruminal fermentation, and site of starch digestion in early lactation cows fed corn grain harvested and processed differently. J. Dairy Sci., 81: 1972–1984.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75771-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Kowalski Z.M., Pisulewski P.M.P., Peyraud J-L., Kamiński J. (1995). The effect of drier outflow temperature on rumen protein degradability and intestinal digestibility of rumen-undegraded protein of dehydrated grass and lucerne. Ann. Zootech., 44 (suppl.1): 88.10.1051/animres:19950558]Search in Google Scholar
[Krieg J., Seifried N., Steingass H., Rodehutscord M. (2017). In situ and in vitro ruminal starch degradation of grains from different rye, triticale and barley genotypes. Animal, 11 (10): 1745–1753.10.1017/S1751731117000337]Search in Google Scholar
[McAllister T.A., Phillippe C., Rode L.M., Cheng K.J. (1993). Effect of the protein matrix on the digestion of cereal grains by ruminal microorganisms. J. Anim. Sci., 71: 205–212.10.2527/1993.711205x]Search in Google Scholar
[Mabjeesh S.J., Cohen M., Arieli A. (2000). In vitro methods for measuring the dry matter digestibility of ruminant feedstuffs: Comparison of methods and inoculum source. J. Dairy Sci., 83: 2289–2294.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75115-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Menke H.H., Steingass H. (1988). Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Develop., 28: 7-55.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mertens D.R. (2002). Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: Collaborative Study. J. AOAC Int., 85 (6): 1217–1240.]Search in Google Scholar
[Micek P. (2008). Nutritional usefulness to ruminants of grain of Polish cereal species and cultivars. Scientific papers of University of Agriculture in Krakow. Habilitation thesis No 326, 1–127 (in Polish).]Search in Google Scholar
[Mills J.A.N., France J., Dijkstra J. (1999). A review of starch digestion in the lactating dairy cow and proposals for a mechanistic model. 2. Postruminal starch digestion and small intestinal glucose absorption. J. Anim. Feed Sci., 8 (4): 451–481.10.22358/jafs/69123/1999]Search in Google Scholar
[Nikokyris P.N., Kandylis K. (1997). Feed protein fractions in various solvents of ruminant feedstuffs. J. Sci. Food Agric., 75: 198–204.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199710)75:2<198::AID-JSFA863>3.0.CO;2-C]Search in Google Scholar
[NRC (2001). National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th rev. ed., National Academy Press, Washington, DC.]Search in Google Scholar
[Offner A., Sauvant D. (2004). Prediction of in vivo starch digestion in cattle from in situ data. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 111: 41–56.10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00216-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Owens F.N., Zinn R.A., Kim Y.K. (1986). Limits to starch digestion in the ruminant small intestine. J. Anim. Sci., 63: 1634–1648.10.2527/jas1986.6351634x]Search in Google Scholar
[Ørskov E.R. (1986). Starch digestion and utilization in ruminants. J. Anim. Sci., 63: 1624–1633.10.2527/jas1986.6351624x]Search in Google Scholar
[Ørskov E.R., McDonald P. (1979). The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J. Agric. Sci., 92: 499–503.10.1017/S0021859600063048]Search in Google Scholar
[Petr J. (2005). Yield potential of rye, hybrid and population varieties in ecological and intensive cultivation. Sci. Agric. Bohem., 36 (2): 41–48.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peyraud J.L., Genest-Rulquin Ch., Verité R. (1988). Mesure de la digestion de l’azote des aliments dans l’intestin des ruminants par la technique des sachets mobiles. 1. Evaluation de la quantité de matières azotées indigestibles en sachet des principaux aliments. Reprod. Nutr. Dev., 28: 129–130.10.1051/rnd:19881139]Search in Google Scholar
[Philippeau C., Le Deschault de Monredon F., Michalet-Doreau B. (1999). Relationship between ruminal starch degradation and the physical characteristics of corn grain. J. Anim. Sci., 77: 238–243.10.2527/1999.771238x]Search in Google Scholar
[Philippeau C., Michalet-Doreau B. (1998). Influence of genotype and ensiling of corn grain on in situ degradation of starch in the rumen. J. Dairy Sci., 81: 2178–2184.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75796-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Plaizier J.C., Krause D.O., Gozho G.N., McBride B.W. (2009). Subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows: the physiological causes, incidence and consequences. Vet. J., 176: 21–31.10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.12.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Rémond D., Cabrera-Estrada J.I., Champion M., Chauveau B., Coudure R., Poncet C. (2004). Effect of corn particle size on site and extent of starch digestion in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 87: 1389–1399.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73288-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Robertson J.B., Van Soest P.J. (1981). The detergent system analysis and its application to human foods. In “The analysis of dietary fiber in food”, ed. by J. Theander, Dekker INC, pp 123–157.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rowe J.B., Choct M., Pethick D.W. (1999). Processing cereal grains for animal feeding. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 50 (5): 721–736.10.1071/AR98163]Search in Google Scholar
[Sauvant D. (1997). Conséquences digestives et zootechniques des variations de la vitesse de digestion de l’amidon chez les ruminants. INRA Prod. Anim., 10: 287–300.10.20870/productions-animales.1997.10.4.4003]Search in Google Scholar
[Seifried N., Steingass H., Schipprack W., Rodehutscord M. (2016). Variation in ruminal in situ degradation of crude protein and starch from maize grains compared to in vitro gas production kinetics and physical and chemical characteristics. Arch. Anim. Nutr., 70: 333–349.10.1080/1745039X.2016.1215028]Search in Google Scholar
[Svihus B., Uhlen A.K., Harstad O.M. (2005). Effect of starch granule structure, associated components and processing on nutritive value of cereal starch: A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 122: 303–320.10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.02.025]Search in Google Scholar
[Tagliapietra F., Cattani M., Hansen H., Hindrichsen I., Bailoni L., Schiavon S. (2011). Metabolizable energy content of feeds based on 24 or 48 h in situ NDF digestibility and on in vitro 24 h gas production methods. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 170: 182–191.10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.09.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Tothi R., Lund P., Weisbjerg M.R., Hvelplund T. (2003). Effect of expander processing on fractional rate of maize and barley starch degradation in the rumen of dairy cows estimated using rumen evacuation and in situ techniques. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 104: 71–94.10.1016/S0377-8401(02)00292-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang M., Jiang J., Tan Z.L., Tang S.X., Sun Z.H., Han X.F. (2009). In situ ruminal crude protein and starch degradation of three classes of feedstuffs in goats. J. Appl. Anim. Res., 36: 23–28.10.1080/09712119.2009.9707023]Search in Google Scholar
[Woods V.B., Moloney A.P., O’Mara F.P.O. (2003). The nutritive value of concentrate feedstuffs for ruminant animals: Part II: In situ ruminal degradability of crude protein. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 110: 131–143.10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00222-0]Search in Google Scholar