[Anele U.Y., Yang W.Z., Mcginn P.J., Tibbetts S.M., Mcallister T.A. (2016). Ruminal in vitro gas production, dry matter digestibility, methane abatement potential and fatty acid biohydrogenation of six species of microalgae. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 96: 354–363.]Search in Google Scholar
[AOAC (1990). Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Vo, 1990.]Search in Google Scholar
[AOAC (2012). Fat (crude) or ether extraction in animal feed, in: Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 19th ed., AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bach A., Calsamiglia S., Stern M.D. (2005). Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen. J. Dairy. Sci., 88: E9–E21.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baker S.K. (1999). Rumen methanogens and inhibition of methanogenesis. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 50: 1293–1298.]Search in Google Scholar
[Beauchemin K.A., Kreuzer M., O ‘ Mara F., Mc Allister T.A. (2008). Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: A review. Aust. J. Exp. Agric., 48: 21–27.]Search in Google Scholar
[Boeckaert C., Vlaeminck B., Dijkstra J., Issa-Zacharia A., Van Nespen T., Van Straalen W., Fievez V. (2008). Effect of dietary starch or micro algae supplementation on rumen fermentation and milk fatty acid composition of dairy cows. J. Dairy. Sci., 91: 4714–4727.]Search in Google Scholar
[Boguhn J., Zuber T., Rodehutscord M. (2013). Effect of donor animals and their diet on in vitro nutrient degradation and microbial protein synthesis using grass and corn silages. J Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 97: 547–557.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bohutskyi P., Betenbaugh M.J., Bouwer E.J. (2014). The effects of alternative pretreatment strategies on anaerobic digestion and methane production from different algal strains. Bioresour. Technol., 155: 366–372.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chalupa W. (1977). Manipulating rumen fermentation. J. Anim. Sci., 46: 585–599.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cottle D., Nolan J., Wiedemann S. (2011). Ruminant enteric methane mitigation, a review. Anim. Prod. Sci., 51: 491–514.]Search in Google Scholar
[de Macario E.C., Macario A.J.L. (2009). Methanogenic archaea in health and disease: a novel paradigm of microbial pathogenesis. Int. J. Med. Microbiol., 299: 99–108.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dubois B., Tomkins N., Kinley R.D., Bai M., Seymour S., Paul N.A., Nys R. (2013). Effect of tropical algae as additives on rumen in vitro gas production and fermentation characteristics. Am. J. Plant Sci., 4: 34–43.]Search in Google Scholar
[Durmic Z., Moate P.J., Eckard R., Revell D.K., Williams R., Vercoe P.E. (2014). In vitro screening of selected feed additives, plant essential oils and plant extracts for rumen methane mitigation. J. Sci. Food Agric., 94: 1191–1196.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fievez V., Boeckaert C., Vlaeminck B., Mestdagh J., Demeyer D. (2007). In vitro examination of DHA-edible micro-algae, 2. Effect on rumen methane production and apparent degradability of hay. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 136: 80–95.]Search in Google Scholar
[Han K.J., Mc Cormick M.E. (2014). Evaluation of nutritive value and in vitro rumen fermentation gas accumulation of de-oiled algal residues. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol., 5: 31.]Search in Google Scholar
[Horwitz W. (1975). Official Methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, AOAC, Washington, DC, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Isaac A.R., Johnson W.C. (1998). Elemental Determination by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry, Handbook of Reference Methods for Plant Analysis. Ed. Karla, Y.P. – CRC Press, Washington, D.C., pp.165–170.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kholif A., Morsy T., Matloup O., Anele U., Mohamed A., El-Sayed A. (2017). Dietary Chlorella vulgaris microalgae improves feed utilization, milk production and concentrations of conjugated linoleic acids in the milk of Damascus goats. J. Agric. Sci., 155: 508–518.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kinley R.D., de Nys R., Vucko M.J., Machado L., Tomkins N.W. (2016). The red macroalgae Asparagopsistaxiformis is a potent natural antimethanogenic that reduces methane production during in vitro fermentation with rumen fluid. Anim. Prod. Sci., 56: 282–289.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kotrbáček V., Doubek J., Doucha J. (2015). The chlorococcalean alga Chlorella in animal nutrition, a review. J. Appl. Phycol., 27: 2173–2180.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lodge-Ivey S.L., Tracey L.N., Salazar A. (2014). The utility of lipid extracted algae as a protein source in forage or starch-based ruminant diets. J. Anim. Sci., 92: 1331–1342.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lum K.K., Kim J., Lei X.G. (2013). Dual potential of microalgae as a sustainable biofuel feedstock and animal feed. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol., 4: 53.]Search in Google Scholar
[Machado L., Magnusson M., Paul N.A., de Nys R., Tomkins N.W. (2014). Effects of marine and freshwater macroalgae on in vitro total gas and methane production. Plos One 9: e85289.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maia M.R.G., Fonseca A.J.M., Oliveira H.M., Mendonça C., Cabrita A.R.J. (2016). The potential role of seaweeds in the natural manipulation of rumen fermentation and methane production. Sci. Rep., 6: 32321.]Search in Google Scholar
[Medipally S.R., Yusoff F.M., Banerjee S., Shariff M. (2015). Microalgae as sustainable renewable energy feedstock for biofuel production. BioMed Res. Int. 13 pp.10.1155/2015/519513438561425874216]Search in Google Scholar
[Menke K.H., Steingass H. (1987). Schtzung des energetischen Futterwerts aus der in vitro mit Pansensaft bestimmten Gasbildung und der chemischen Analyse. II. Regressions gleichungen. Übers Tierernӓhrg 15: 59–94.]Search in Google Scholar
[Menke K.H., Steingass H. (1988). Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Develop., 28: 7–55.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moate P.J., Williams S.R., Hannah M.C., Eckard R.J., Auldist M.J., Ribaux B.E., Jacobs J. L., Wales W.J. (2013). Effects of feeding algal meal high in docosahexaenoic acid on feed intake, milk production, and methane emissions in dairy cows. J. Dairy. Sci., 96: 3177–3188.]Search in Google Scholar
[Monteny G.J., Bennink A., Chadwick D. (2006). Greenhouse gas abatement strategies for animal husbandry. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 112: 163–170.]Search in Google Scholar
[National Research Council. (2001). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 2001. National Academy of Sciences. 6th Rev Ed. Washington, D.C. https://doi.org/10.17226/9825.10.17226/9825]Search in Google Scholar
[Piorreck M., Baasch K.H., Pohl P. (1984). Biomass production, total protein, chlorophylls, lipids and fatty acids of freshwater green and blue-green algae under different nitrogen regimes. Phytochemist., 23: 207–216.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tsiplakou E., Abdullah M.A.M., Skliros D., Chatzikonstantinou M., Flemetakis E., Labrou N., Zervas G. (2017). The effect of dietary Chlorella vulgaris supplementation on micro-organism community, enzyme activities and fatty acid profile in the rumen liquid of goats. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 101: 275–283.]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Kessel J.A.S., Russell J.B. (1996). The effect of pH on ruminal methanogenesis. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 20: 205–210.]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B., Lewis B.A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy. Sci., 74: 3583–3597.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wild K.J., Steingaß H., Rodehutscord M. (2019). Variability of in vitro ruminal fermentation and nutritional value of cell-disrupted and non-disrupted microalgae for ruminants. GCB Bioenergy, 11: 345–359.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wu S., Feng X., Wittmeier A. (1997). Microwave digestion of plant and grain reference materials in nitric acid or a mixture of nitric acid and hydrogen peroxide for the determination of multi-elements by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. J. Anal. Atom Spectrom., 12: 797–806.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yan L., Lim S.U., Kim I.H. (2012). Effect of fermented chlorella supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, fecal microbial and fecal noxious gas content in growing pigs. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 25: 1742–1747.]Search in Google Scholar
