[Ahammed M., Chae B.J., Lohakare J., Keohavong B., Lee M.H., Lee S.J., Kim D.M., Lee J.Y., Ohh S.J. (2014). Comparison of aviary, barn and conventional cage raising of chickens on laying performance and egg quality. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 27: 1196–1203.10.5713/ajas.2013.13394]Search in Google Scholar
[Al-Haweizy A.A., Al-Sardary S.Y. (2008). Effect of dehydrated alfalfa and age on egg weight, albumen percentage, albumen index and haugh units in Hy-line W-98 layers. Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica, 1: 25–28.]Search in Google Scholar
[Anyaegbu B.C., Onunkwo D.N., Irebuisi D. (2016). Evaluation of hen age, body weight and egg weight on percent egg component and the internal composition of Harco hen eggs. Sci-Afric. J. Sci. Issues, 4: 943–945.]Search in Google Scholar
[Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). (1995). Official methods of analysis. 923.03: 16th ed. Arlington.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barzilai N., Huffman D.M., Muzumdar R.H., Bartke A. (2012). The critical role of metabolic pathways in aging. Diabetes, 61: 1315–1322.10.2337/db11-1300]Search in Google Scholar
[Calabrese V., Mancuso C., Sapienza M., Puleo E., Calafato S., Cornelius C., Finocchiaro M., Mangiameli A., Di Mauro M., Giuffrida Stella A.M., Castellino P. (2007). Oxidative stress and cellular stress response in diabetic nephropathy. Cell Stress Chaperon., 12: 299–306.10.1379/CSC-270.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Chang-Ho K., Jong-Ho S., Jae-Cheong L., Kyung-Woo L. (2014). Age-related changes in egg quality of Hy-Line Brown hens. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 13: 510–514.10.3923/ijps.2014.510.514]Search in Google Scholar
[Collins L.M., Dziak J.J., Li R. (2009). Design of experiments with multiple independent variables: a resource management perspective on complete and reduced factorial designs. Psychol. Methods, 14: 202–224.10.1037/a0015826]Search in Google Scholar
[Dattilo S., Mancuso C., Koverech G., Mauro P.D., Ontario M.L., Petralia C.C., Petralia A., Luigi Maiolino L., Serra A., Calabrese E.J., Calabrese V. (2015). Heat shock proteins and hormesis in the diagnosis and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Immun. Ageing, 12: 20.10.1186/s12979-015-0046-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Denli M., Bukun B., Tutkun M. (2016). Comparative performance and egg quality of laying hens in enriched cages and free-range systems. Sci. Pap. Ser. D Anim. Sci., LIX: 29–32.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dvořák P., Suchý P., Straková E., Koprivá V. (2012). Possibilities of enhancing the colour of egg yolk. J. Sci. Food Agric., 92: 853–856.10.1002/jsfa.4657]Search in Google Scholar
[Englmaierová M., Tůmová E., Charvátová V., Skřivan M. (2014). Effects of laying hens housing system on laying performance, egg quality characteristics, and egg microbial contamination. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 59: 345–352.10.17221/7585-CJAS]Search in Google Scholar
[Farooq M., Mian M.A., Durrani F.R., Syed M. (2012). Egg production performance of commercial laying hens in Chakwal district, Pakistan. Pakistan: Livestock Research for Rural Development; http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd14/2/faro142.htm.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferrante V., Lolli S., Vezzoli G., Cavalchini L.G. (2009). Effects of two different rearing systems (organic and barn) on production performance, animal welfare traits and egg quality characteristics in laying hens. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 8: 165–174.10.4081/ijas.2009.165]Search in Google Scholar
[Gassmann M., Greminacher B., Rohde B., Vogel J. (2009). Quantifying western blots: pitfalls of densitometry. Electrophoresis, 30: 1845–1855.10.1002/elps.200800720]Search in Google Scholar
[Givisiez P.E.N., da Silva M.M., Mazzi C.M., Ferro M.I.T., Ferro J.A., Gonzales E., Macari M. (2001). Heat or cold chronic stress affects organ weights and Hsp70 levels in chicken embryos. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 82: 83–87.10.4141/A00-049]Search in Google Scholar
[Golden J.B., Arbona D.V., Anderson K.E. (2012). A comparative examination of rearing parameters and layer production performance for Brown egg-type pullets grown for either free-range or cage production. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 21: 95–102.10.3382/japr.2011-00370]Search in Google Scholar
[Gu X.H., Hao Y., Wang X.L. (2012). Overexpression of heat shock protein 70 and its relationship to intestine under acute heat stress in broilers: 2. Intestinal oxidative stress. Poultry Sci., 91: 790–799.10.3382/ps.2011-01628]Search in Google Scholar
[Hansen P.J. (2004). Physiological and cellular adaptations of zebu cattle to thermal stress. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 82–83: 349–360.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.04.011]Search in Google Scholar
[Holt P.S., Davies R.H., Dewulf J., Gast R.K., Huwe J.K., Jones D.R., Waltman D., Willian K.R. (2011). The impact of different housing systems on egg safety and quality. Poultry Sci., 90: 251–262.10.3382/ps.2010-00794]Search in Google Scholar
[Ismail F.S.A., Hayam M.A., Abo El-Maaty, Rabie M.H., Aswad A.Q. (2015). Productive performance of bovans white laying hens fed high nutrient density diets under Egyptian summer conditions. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 10: 865–874.10.3923/ajava.2015.865.874]Search in Google Scholar
[Ketta M., Tumova L. (2018). Relationship between eggshell thickness and other eggshell measurements in eggs from litter and cages. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 17: 234–239.10.1080/1828051X.2017.1344935]Search in Google Scholar
[Krawczyk J. (2009). Effect of layer age and egg production level on changes in quality traits of eggs from hens of conservation breeds and commercial hybrids. Ann. Anim. Sci., 9: 185–193.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kucukyilmaz K., Bozkurt M., Herken E.N., Cinar M., Catli A.U., Bintas E., Coven F. (2012). Effects of rearing systems on performance, egg characteristics and immune response in two layer hen genotype. Asian-Austral. J. Anim. Sci., 25: 559–568.10.5713/ajas.2011.11382]Search in Google Scholar
[Laemmli U.K. (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacterio-phage T4. Nature, 227: 680–685.10.1038/227680a0]Search in Google Scholar
[Lewko L., Gornowicz E. (2011). Effect of housing system on egg quality in laying hens. Ann. Anim. Sci., 11: 607–616.10.2478/v10220-011-0012-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Minelli G., Sirri F., Folegatti E., Meluzzi A., Franchini A. (2007). Egg quality traits of laying hens reared in organic and conventional systems. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 6: 728–730.10.4081/ijas.2007.1s.728]Search in Google Scholar
[Mugnai C., Dal Bosco A., Castellini C. (2009). Effect of rearing system and season on the performance and egg characteristics of Ancona laying hens. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 8: 175–188.10.4081/ijas.2009.175]Search in Google Scholar
[National Research Council (NRC). (1994). Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th Rev ed. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sci., p. 19.]Search in Google Scholar
[Patir H., Upadhyay R.C. (2010). Purification, characterization and expression kinetics of heat shock protein 70 from Bubalus bubalis. Res. Vet. Sci., 88: 258–262.10.1016/j.rvsc.2009.09.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Perić L., Dukić Stojčić M., Bjedov S. (2016). Effect of production systems on quality and chemical composition of table eggs. Serbian J. Agric. Sci., 65: 27–31.10.1515/contagri-2016-0014]Search in Google Scholar
[Pištěková V., Hovorka M., Večerek V., Straková E., Suchý P. (2006). The quality comparison of eggs laid by laying hens kept in battery cages and in a deep litter system. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 51: 318–325.10.17221/3945-CJAS]Search in Google Scholar
[Pourouchottamane R., Ramesh Saravana Kumar V., Venkatsubramanian V., Kataktalware M.A., Mishra A., Muzamil S., Pankaj PK. (2012). Influence of rearing system on the production performance of commercial layers. Appl. Biol. Res., 14: 000–000.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rath P.K., Mishra P.K., Mallick B.K., Behura N.C. (2015). Evaluation of different egg quality traits and interpretation of their mode of inheritance in White Leghorns. Vet. World, 8: 449–452.10.14202/vetworld.2015.449-452]Search in Google Scholar
[Ribeiro P.A.P., Matos Jr J.B., Lara L.J.C., Araujo L.F., Albuquerque R., Baiao N.C. (2014). Effect of dietary energy concentration on performance parameters and egg quality of white leghorn laying hens. Braz. J. Poultry Sci., 16: 381–388.10.1590/1516-635X1604381-388]Search in Google Scholar
[Rouf M.G., Ahammed M., Ahammad M.U., Rahman M.R. (2015). Effects of cage and barn rearing system on early laying performance of pullet. Bang. J. Anim. Sci., 44 :151–156.10.3329/bjas.v44i3.26365]Search in Google Scholar
[Simsek U.G., Ciftci M., Ozcelik M., Azman M.A., Tonbak F., Ozhan N. (2015). Effects of cinnamon and rosemary oils on egg production, egg quality, hatchability traits and blood serum mineral contents in laying quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Ankara Üniv. Vet. Fak. Derg., 62: 229–236.10.1501/Vetfak_0000002685]Search in Google Scholar
[Simsek U.G., Baykalir Y., Erisir M., Benzer F. (2018). Effects of conventional and organic rearing systems and hen age on oxidative stress parameters of blood and ovarian tissues in laying hens. Ankara Üniv. Vet. Fak. Derg., 65: 85–91.10.1501/Vetfak_0000002832]Search in Google Scholar
[Singh R., Cheng K.M., Silversides F.G. (2009). Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens. Poultry Sci., 88: 256–264.10.3382/ps.2008-00237]Search in Google Scholar
[Stanley V.G., Nelson D., Daley M.B. (2014). Evaluation of two laying systems (floor vs. cage) on egg production, quality and safety. Iran. J. Appl. Anim. Sci., 4: 597–601.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tactacan G.B., Guenter W., Lewis N.J., Rodriguez-Lecompte J.C., House J.D. (2009). Performance and welfare of laying hens in conventional and enriched cages. Poult. Sci., 88: 698–707.10.3382/ps.2008-00369]Search in Google Scholar
[Tamzil M.H., Noor R.R., Hardjosworo P.S., Manalu W., Sumantri C. (2013). Acute heat stress responses of three lines of chickens with different heat shock protein (HSP)-70 geno-types. Int. J. Poultry Sci., 12: 264–272.10.3923/ijps.2013.264.272]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomas D.V., Ravindran V. (2005). Comparison of layer performance in cage and barn systems. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 4: 554–556.]Search in Google Scholar
[Towbin H., Staehelin T., Gordon J. (1979). Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from poly-acrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 76: 4350–4354.10.1073/pnas.76.9.4350]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Den Brand H., Parmentier H.K., Kemp B. (2004). Effects of housing system (outdoor vs cages) and age of laying hens on egg characteristics. Br. Poultry Sci., 45: 745–752.10.1080/00071660400014283]Search in Google Scholar
[Yenice G., Kaynar O., Ileriturk M., Hıra F., Hayırlı A. (2016). Quality of eggs in different production systems. Czech J. Food Sci., 34: 370–376.10.17221/33/2016-CJFS]Search in Google Scholar
[Yilmaz-Dikmen B., Ipek A., Sahan U., Petek M., Sozcu A. (2016). Egg production and welfare of laying hens kept in different housing systems (conventional, enriched cage, and free range). Poultry Sci., 95: 1564–1572.10.3382/ps/pew082]Search in Google Scholar
[Yilmaz-Dikmen B., Ipek A., Sahan U., Sozcu A., Baycan S.C. (2017). Impact of different housing systems and age of layers on egg quality characteristics. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 41: 77–84.10.3906/vet-1604-71]Search in Google Scholar
[Zaghini A., Martelli G., Roncada P., Simioli M., Rizzi L. (2005). Mannanoligosaccha-rides and aflatoxin B1 in feed for laying hens: Effects on egg quality, aflatoxins B1 and M1 residues in eggs and aflatoxin B1 levels in liver. Poultry Sci., 84: 825–832.10.1093/ps/84.6.825]Search in Google Scholar
[Zita L., Ledvinka Z., Tumova E., Klesalova L. (2012). Technological quality of eggs in relation to the age of laying hens and Japanese quails. R. Bras. Zootec., 41: 2079–2084.10.1590/S1516-35982012000900016]Search in Google Scholar