[Board R.G., Tullett S.G. (1975). The pore arrangement in the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) eggshell as shown by plastic models. J. Microsc., 103: 281-284.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burton F.G., Tullett S.G. (1983). Acomparison of the effects of eggshell porosity on the respiration and growth of domestic fowl, duck and turkey embryos. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A, 75, 2: 167-174.]Search in Google Scholar
[Christensen V.L., Davis G.S., Lucore L.A. (1996). Eggshell conductance and other functional qualities of ostrich eggs. Poultry Sci., 75: 1404-1410.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heredia A., Rodriguez- Hernandez A.G., Lozano L.F., Pena - Rico M.A., Ve -lazquez R., Basiuk V.A., Bucio L. (2005). Microstructure and thermal change of texture of calcite crystals in ostrich eggshell Struthio camelus. Mat. Sci. Eng. C, 25: 1-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[Horbańczuk J.O. (2002). The ostrich. Polish Academy of Sciences Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Warsaw, 182 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kożuszek R., Kontecka H., Nowaczewski S., Leśnierowski G., Kijowski J., Rosiński A. (2009). Quality of pheasant (Phasianus colchicus L.) eggs with different shell colour. Arch. Geflugelkd., 73, 3: 201-207.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krystianiak S., Kożuszek R., Kontecka H., Nowaczewski S. (2005). Quality and ultrastructure of eggshell and hatchability of eggs in relation to eggshell colour in pheasants. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep., 23, 1: 5-14.]Search in Google Scholar
[Michalak K., Mróz E. (2004). Shell microstructure of turkey hatching eggs differing in surface appearance (in Polish). Zesz. Nauk. Prz. Hod., 72, 4: 15-26.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mikhailov K.E. (1997). Avian eggshells: an atlas of Scanning Electron Micrographs. The British Ornithologists’ Club, Occasional Publications, 3, p. 6.]Search in Google Scholar
[Minnaar P., Minnaar M. (1993). The emu farmer’s hand-book. Induna Company. Groveton, Texas, 177 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Panheleux M., Bain M., Fernandez M.S., Morales I., Gautron J., Arias J.L., Solo -mon S.E., Hincke M., Nys Y. (1999). Organic matrix composition and ultrastructure of eggshell:acomparative study. Brit. Poultry Sci., 40, 2: 240-252.]Search in Google Scholar
[Puchajda H., Pudyszak K., Mróz E., Cywa - Benko K. (2000). Eggshell ultrastructure and macroscopic structure of eggs from White Kołuda and Biłgoraj geese (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk. Zoot., 27, 1: 65-78.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosiński A., Elminowska - Wenda G., Gielecki J., Cywa - Benko K. (1993). Application of digital image analysis system in the examination of hen outer egg shell membrane (in Polish). Zesz. Nauk. Prz. Hod., 8: 36-41.]Search in Google Scholar
[Soliman F.N.K., Rizk R.E., Brake J. (1994). Relationship between shell porosity, shell thickness, egg weight loss, and embryonic development in Japanese quail eggs. Poultry Sci., 73: 1607-1611.]Search in Google Scholar
[Solomon S.E. (1997). Egg and Eggshell Quality. Iowa State University Press, Iowa, USA, 149 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Szczerbińska D. (2002). Characterisation of the reproductive performance of emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) with particular reference to eggshell ultrastructure and its association with egg hatchability indices (in Polish). AR Szczecin, Treatises, 210.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tullett S.G. (1984). The porosity of avian eggshells. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A, 78, 1: 5-13.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tyler C. (1953). Studies on eggshells II. Amethod for marking and counting pores. J. Sci. Food Agric., 4: 266-272.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiercińska M., Szczerbińska D. (2010). The characteristics of Rhea eggshell ultrastructure and hatchability (in Polish). Acta Sci. Pol. Zootech., 9, 2: 65-74. ]Search in Google Scholar
