Analysis of the Plea Leniency System and Plea Bargaining System in the Era of Big Data

[1] Yao, M., & CUFE. (2015). Improvement of the Guilty Plea Proceedings - Plea Bargaining for Reference. Theoretic Observation. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Wilford, M. M., & Redlich, A. D. (2018). Deciphering the Guilty Plea: Where Research Can Inform Policy. Psychology Public Policy and Law, 24(2), 145-146. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Zadora, K. (2020). Alternative Forms of Dispute Resolution to Court Proceedings. General Comments on Negotiations and Mediation in Polish Law. Roczniki Administracji i Prawa, 4(XX), 225-234. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Metcalfe, C. (2021). Toward a Method for Evaluating Court Actor Influences on Plea Negotiations: A Preliminary Exploration of Public Defenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2021(4). Search in Google Scholar

[5] Anidjar, L. Y., Katz, O., & Zamir, E. (2020). Enforced Performance in Common Law Versus Civil Law Systems: An Empirical Study of a Legal Transformation. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 68(1), 1-54. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Hou, H. D., & Lin, D. M. (2019). Current Situation and Improvement of Leniency for Guilty Plea and Accepting Punishment in Chinese Public Security Organs - Taking Beijing Pilot Work as an Example. Journal of Beijing Police College. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Wang, R. J. (2016). On Cohesiveness of Leniency for Guilty Plea and Accepting Punishment: From Perspective of Investigation System. Journal of Sichuan Police College. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Yao, L., Wang, Y., & Cheng, C. (2017). Several Evidence-Related Issues on the Pretrial Leniency System of Guilty Plea. Evidence Science. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Ge, T., Law, S. O., & University H. (2018). Analysis of the Problems in the Trial of the Leniency System of Guilty Plea. Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition). Search in Google Scholar

[10] Zhang, L., & Rui, H. (2018). On the Plea and Punishes Leniency System. Administration and Law. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Wei, Y. (2017). Discussion on the Pilot Work of Leniency System in Guilty Plea. Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Li, Z. (2018). Research on the Protection of Aggrieved Person in the System of Leniency for Guilty Plea and Accepting Punishment in China. Journal of Huanghe S&T University. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Brook, C. A., et al. (2016). A Comparative Look at Plea Bargaining in Australia, Canada, England, New Zealand, and the United States. William & Mary Law Review. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Korchago, E. (2021). Plea bargaining institute in Russia: searching for the due process of law in criminal cases. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Wilford, M. M., Wells, G. L., & Frazier, A. (2021). Plea-Bargaining Law: the Impact of Innocence, Trial Penalty, and Conviction Probability on Plea Outcomes. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 46(3), 554-575. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Bjerk, D., & McAfee, P. (2021). SOCIALLY OPTIMAL PLEA BARGAINING WITH COSTLY TRIALS AND BAYESIAN JURIES. Economic Inquiry. Search in Google Scholar

[17] H., Van, Dyke, & Parunak. (2018). Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques (4th ed.). Computing Reviews. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Xu, S. (2017). Exploration on Criminal Case Division According to Complexity - Perspective from Guilty Plea Leniency System Pilot. Nanjing University Law Review. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Weidong, C. (2017). Several issues on the pilot run of the leniency system of guilty plea. Journal of National Prosecutors College. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Langbein, J. H. (2022). The Turn to Confession Bargaining in German Criminal Procedure: Causes and Comparisons with American Plea Bargaining. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 2022(1), 1. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Salihu, H. A. (2022). Plea bargaining in the Nigerian criminal justice system: A procedural tool for loot recovery or justice administration? Crime, Law and Social Change, 78(2), 145-164. Search in Google Scholar