The consistency method of linguistic information and other four preference information in group decision-making

[1] Bordogna G, Pasi G. A fuzzy linguistic approach generalizing boolean information retrieval: a model and its evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 1993, 44: 70–82. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Yager R R. Applications and extensions of OWA aggregations. International Journal of Man-Machine Studied, 1992, 37: 103-132. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Zadeh, L. A. “A Computational Approach to Fuzzy Quantifiers in Natural Languages,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 1983, 9: 149–184. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Meng Fanyong, Tang Jie, Hamido Fujita Meng Fanyong, Tang Jie, Hamido Fujita. Linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations and their application to multi-criteria decision making[J]. Information Fusion, 2019, 46:77-90. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Fang Liua, Qin Yu, Witold PedryczWei, Guo Zhang. A group decision making model based on an inconsistency index of interval multiplicative reciprocal matrices[J]. Knowle dge-Base d Systems, Knowledge-Based Systems, 145(2018): 67–76. Search in Google Scholar

[6] J. Hu, L. Pan, Y. Yang, H. Chen, A group medical diagnosis model based on intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets, Appl. Soft Comput. 77 (2019) 453–466, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.01.041.2. Search in Google Scholar

[7] F.Y. Meng, C.Q. Tan, A new consistency concept for interval multiplicative pre-ference relations, Appl. Soft Comput. 52 (2017) 262–276. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Delgado M, Herrera F, Herrera ViedmaE et al. Combining numerical and linguistic information in group decision making [J]. Information Sciences, 1998, 107(2):177-194. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Wujiang. Study of Methods for Transforming Four Preference Information in Group Decis ion Making [J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2004, 26(3):64-67. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Xiao sihan, Fan zhiping, Wang mengguang. Uniform approach to two forms of preference information – AHP judgement matrices and fuzzy preference relation matrices in group decision making[J]. Journal of system sengineering, 2002, 17(1):82-86. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Chen huayou, Liu Chunlin. Relative entropy aggregation method in group decision making based on different types of preference information [J]. Journal of Southeast University, 2005, 35(2):311-315. Search in Google Scholar

[12] TANG Yan-wu, CHEN Hua-you. A New Method of Adjusting the Inconsistency of Judgment Matrices with Linguistic Terms Based on Compatibil ity [J]. Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics, 2010, 24(2):112-118. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Yangjing. Rsearch on aggregation method witj different forms of preference information based on fuzzy clustering[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Thory, 2017, 47(10):1-7. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Gao, Jie; Xu, Zeshui; Ren, Peijia. An emergency decision making method based on the multiplicative consistency of probabilistic linguistic preference relations[J]. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2019, 10(7):1613-1629. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Tian, ZP, Nie, RX, Wang, JQ. Consistency and consensus improvement models driven by a personalized normalization method with probabilistic linguistic preference relations[J]. Information Fusion, 2021, 69, 156-179. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Gao J, Xu ZS, Liang ZL, Liao HC. Expected consistency-based emergency decision making with incomplete probabilistic linguistic preference relations [J]. Knowledge-based Systems, 2019, 176, 15-28. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Wei Cuiping, Feng Xiangqian, Zhang Yuzhong. Method for measuring the satisfactory consistency of a linguistic judgment matrix [J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2009, 29(1):104-110. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Fan Zhiping, Jiang Yanping. A judgment method for the satisfying consistency of linguistic judgment matrix [J]. Control and Decision, 2004, 19 (8): 903-906. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1998, 97:33-48. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Tanino T. On group decision making under fuzzy preference[C]//J Kacprzyk, M Fedrizzi. Multiperson Decision Making Using Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1990:172-185. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Saaty T L. The analytic hierarchy process [M]. New York: McGraw 2 Hill, 1980.80-210. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Yager RR. An approach to ordinal decision making. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 1995, 12: 237–261. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Xiao Sihan, Fan Zhiping, Wang Mengguang. Consistency analysis of fuzzy judgment matrix [J]. Journal of system engineering, 2001, 16(2):142-145. Search in Google Scholar