The policy efficiency evaluation of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei regional government guidance fund based on the entropy method

Region	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018
Beijing	0	14	26	26	88	33	132	184	42	40	167	260	205	155	1372
Tianjin	0	13	0	91	47	41	37	46	31	0	84	81	278	102	851
Hebei	12	12	16	33	179	121	167	149	128	99	702	1221	981	774	4594
	12	39	42	150	314	195	336	379	201	139	953	1562	1464	1031	6817

Policy efficiency of government guide fund

Beijing	Tianjin	Hebei
0.725	0.806	0.808

Standardised policy output values of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region

Year	Beijing	Tianjin	Hebei
2005	0.116	0.031	0.036
2006	0.152	0.042	0.048
2007	0.200	0.056	0.065
2008	0.239	0.080	0.083
2009	0.271	0.091	0.093
2010	0.332	0.115	0.117
2011	0.401	0.151	0.150
2012	0.487	0.179	0.168
2013	0.566	0.211	0.183
2014	0.624	0.238	0.191
2015	0.688	0.264	0.198
2016	0.788	0.297	0.220
2017	0.865	0.290	0.237
2018	0.995	0.238	0.252

GRA analysis result of government guidance fund policy and policy output

Region	Intensity	Objectives	Measures
Beijing	0.633	0.678	0.649
Tianjin	0.772	0.775	0.749
Hebei	0.733	0.689	0.722

Results of normalisation of the policy output indicator data of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region

Year	Transaction volume in the market technology			Domestic invention patent applications			Regional GDP			Regional GDP per capita

	Beijing	Tianjin	Hebei	Beijing	Tianjin	Hebei	Beijing	Tianjin	Hebei	Beijing	Tianjin	Hebei
2005	0.076	0.006	0	0.02	0.006	0	0.055	0	0.109	0.102	0.07	0
2006	0.109	0.008	0.001	0.024	0.007	0.001	0.075	0.01	0.135	0.116	0.087	0.007
2007	0.139	0.01	0.001	0.032	0.007	0.001	0.106	0.024	0.174	0.151	0.111	0.016
2008	0.162	0.012	0.001	0.049	0.009	0.002	0.129	0.05	0.217	0.166	0.146	0.027
2009	0.195	0.015	0.001	0.051	0.009	0.003	0.148	0.065	0.239	0.174	0.159	0.033
2010	0.25	0.017	0.001	0.059	0.011	0.004	0.183	0.095	0.295	0.197	0.194	0.046
2011	0.299	0.025	0.003	0.08	0.017	0.006	0.221	0.132	0.369	0.223	0.235	0.064
2012	0.39	0.035	0.004	0.094	0.022	0.009	0.25	0.161	0.406	0.242	0.261	0.073
2013	0.453	0.042	0.003	0.121	0.038	0.011	0.285	0.189	0.439	0.266	0.284	0.08
2014	0.498	0.06	0.003	0.14	0.04	0.013	0.312	0.212	0.457	0.284	0.301	0.084
2015	0.548	0.079	0.005	0.16	0.05	0.018	0.342	0.226	0.464	0.306	0.311	0.085
2016	0.626	0.086	0.008	0.188	0.067	0.023	0.39	0.25	0.504	0.345	0.334	0.094
2017	0.713	0.086	0.013	0.178	0.044	0.023	0.432	0.262	0.539	0.381	0.347	0.102
2018	0.788	0.108	0.042	0.212	0.046	0.032	0.523	0.169	0.512	0.461	0.237	0.094

Quantitative Standard Table of Policies

First-level indicator	Second-level indicator	Score	Evaluation criteria
Policy intensity	Policy intensity	5	Rules, bylaws, regulations
		4	Reconsideration, approval, measures, interim regulations
		3	Notices, resolutions, notifications, announcements
		2	Rules, guidelines, plans, measures, opinions
		1	Plans, outlines

Policy objectives	Industrial development and transformation	5	‘Must’, ‘Forbidden’, ‘Strictly Follow’, ‘Strictly Enforce’ and other strongest and most detailed descriptions
		4	‘No less than/exceeding’, ‘strict use’ and other strong words
		3	Strong words such as ‘full use’, ‘fully mobilise’ and ‘maximum use’, etc.
		2	‘Under the premise of..., it is also possible’, ‘perfect’, ‘sound’, ‘support’ and other general descriptions
		1	General descriptions such as ‘may be based on’, ‘enhance’ and ‘increase’

	Transformation of scientific and technological achievements	5	‘Must’, ‘Forbidden’, ‘Strictly Follow’, ‘Strictly Enforce’ and other strongest and most detailed descriptions
		4	‘No less than/exceeding’, ‘strict use’ and other strong words
		3	Strong words such as ‘full use’, ‘fully mobilise’ and ‘maximum use’, etc.
		2	‘Under the premise of..., it is also possible’, ‘perfect’, ‘sound’, ‘support’ and other general descriptions
		1	General descriptions such as ‘may be based on’, ‘enhanced’ and ‘increase’

	Technological innovation	5	‘Must’, ‘Forbidden’, ‘Strictly Follow’, ‘Strictly Enforce’ and other strongest and most detailed descriptions
		4	‘No less than/exceeding’, ‘strict use’ and other strong words
		3	Strong words such as ‘full use’, ‘fully mobilise’ and ‘maximum use’, etc.
		2	‘Under the premise of..., it is also possible’, ‘perfect’, ‘sound’, ‘support’ and other general descriptions
		1	General descriptions such as ‘may be based on’, ‘enhanced’ and ‘increase’

	Financial Innovation	5	‘Must’, ‘Forbidden’, ‘Strictly Follow’, ‘Strictly Enforce’ and other strongest and most detailed descriptions
		4	‘No less than/exceeding’, ‘strict use’ and other strong words
		3	Strong words such as ‘full use’, ‘fully mobilise’ and ‘maximum use’, etc.
		2	‘Under the premise of..., it is also possible’, ‘perfect’, ‘sound’, ‘support’ and other general descriptions
		1	General descriptions such as ‘may be based on’, ‘enhanced’ and ‘increase’

	National economic development and social	5	‘Must’, ‘Forbidden’, ‘Strictly Follow’, ‘Strictly Enforce’ and other strongest and most detailed descriptions
		4	‘No less than/exceeding’, ‘strict use’ and other strong words
		3	Strong words such as ‘full use’, ‘fully mobilise’ and ‘maximum use’, etc.
		2	‘Under the premise of..., it is also possible’, ‘perfect’, ‘sound’, ‘support’ and other general descriptions
		1	General descriptions such as ‘may be based on’, ‘enhanced’ and ‘increase’

	Real economy development	5	‘Must’, ‘Forbidden’, ‘Strictly Follow’, ‘Strictly Enforce’ and other strongest and most detailed descriptions
		4	‘No less than/exceeding’, ‘strict use’ and other strong words
		3	Strong words such as ‘full use’, ‘fully mobilise’ and ‘maximum use’, etc.
		2	‘Under the premise of..., it is also possible’, ‘perfect’, ‘sound’, ‘support’ and other general descriptions
		1	General descriptions such as ‘may be based on’, ‘enhanced’ and ‘increase’

Policy measures	Administrative measures	5	List specific measures, implement strict implementation and control standards for each item and give specific and detailed explanations
		4	List specific measures, write strict implementation standards for each item and give instructions
		3	List more specific measures and briefly explain
		2	List basic measures without explanation
		1	Only talk about relevant content from a macro perspective, without specific measures

	Fiscal and taxation measures	5	List specific measures, implement strict implementation and control standards for each item and give specific and detailed explanations
		4	List specific measures, write strict implementation standards for each item and give instructions
		3	List more specific measures and briefly explain
		2	List basic measures without explanation
		1	Only talk about relevant content from a macro perspective, without specific measures

	Personnel measures	5	List specific measures, implement strict implementation and control standards for each item and give specific and detailed explanations
		4	List specific measures, write strict implementation standards for each item and give instructions
		3	List more specific measures and briefly explain
		2	List basic measures without explanation
		1	Only talk about relevant content from a macro perspective, without specific measures

	Financial service measures	5	List specific measures, implement strict implementation and control standards for each item and give specific and detailed explanations
		4	List specific measures, write strict implementation standards for each item and give instructions
		3	List more specific measures and briefly explain
		2	List basic measures without explanation
		1	Only talk about relevant content from a macro perspective, without specific measures

Government Guidance Fund Policy and Policy Output Secondary Indicators by GRA

Region	Turnover of the technology market	Number of domestic invention patent applications	GDP	GDP per capita
Beijing	0.680	0.687	0.629	0.614
Tianjin	0.765	0.762	0.762	0.760
Hebei	0.781	0.812	0.705	0.698

Policy Output Indicator System and Weight of Government Guidance Funds

Target level	First-level indicator	Weight	Second-level indicator	Weight	Director
Policy output	Innovation performance	0.667	Turnover of technology market	0.788	+
	Innovation performance	0.667	Number of domestic invention patent applications	0.212	+
	Economic performance	0.333	GDP	0.539	+
	Economic performance	0.333	GDP per capita	0.461	+

Comprehensive Evaluation Index System of Policy Output of Government Guidance Funds

Indicators	First-level indicators	Second-level indicators
Output efficiency	Innovation performance	Number of domestic invention patent applications
	Innovation performance	Turnover of the technology market
	Economic performance	GDP
	Economic performance	GDP per capita

eISSN:: 2444-8656
Sprache:: Englisch

Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:: Volume Open
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:: Biologie, andere, Mathematik, Angewandte Mathematik, Allgemeines, Physik

Zeitschrift RSS Feed

The policy efficiency evaluation of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei regional government guidance fund based on the entropy method

Online veröffentlicht: 22. Nov. 2021

Seitenbereich: 433 - 446

Eingereicht: 06. Juni 2021

Akzeptiert: 24. Sept. 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2021.1.00049

Schlüsselwörterpolicies of government guidance funds, analytic hierarchy process, entropy method, grey relational analysis

© 2021 Jing Cui et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Fig. 1

Quantitative results of the policies of government guidance funds

Policy efficiency of government guide fund

Standardised policy output values of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region

GRA analysis result of government guidance fund policy and policy output

Results of normalisation of the policy output indicator data of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region

Quantitative Standard Table of Policies

Government Guidance Fund Policy and Policy Output Secondary Indicators by GRA

Policy Output Indicator System and Weight of Government Guidance Funds

Comprehensive Evaluation Index System of Policy Output of Government Guidance Funds

Schlüsselwörter
policies of government guidance funds, analytic hierarchy process, entropy method, grey relational analysis