Optimization Strategy of Digital Economy to Promote the Efficiency of Rural-Urban Integration Based on Big Data Analysis
26. Sept. 2025
Über diesen Artikel
Online veröffentlicht: 26. Sept. 2025
Eingereicht: 26. Jan. 2025
Akzeptiert: 28. Apr. 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-1084
Schlüsselwörter
© 2025 Canliang Liu, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

The mediation effect of the factor configuration efficiency is tested
Variable | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 |
---|---|---|---|
Digital economic development | 0.05792*** | 0.11043*** | 0.05206*** |
Factor configuration efficiency | 0.05918*** | ||
Control variable | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Provincial fixation effect | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Year fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes |
N | 350 | 350 | 350 |
R2 | 0.85261 | 0.60277 | 0.86755 |
The average Malmquist index in Guangdong province in 2017-2023 year
Year | Effch | Techch | Pech | Sech | Tfpch | Tfpch sort |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017-2018 | 0.9955 | 2.9426 | 1.0024 | 0.9975 | 2.9319 | 1 |
2018-2019 | 1.0041 | 0.9426 | 0.9983 | 1.0069 | 0.9446 | 5 |
2019-2020 | 0.8847 | 1.5478 | 1.0004 | 0.8836 | 1.3708 | 2 |
2020-2021 | 1.0795 | 0.5428 | 0.9962 | 1.083 | 0.5845 | 6 |
2021-2022 | 1.0561 | 0.9556 | 1.0034 | 1.0528 | 1.0093 | 3 |
2022-2023 | 0.9996 | 1.0022 | 1.0012 | 1.0011 | 1.0014 | 4 |
Mean | 1.0033 | 1.3223 | 1.0003 | 1.0042 | 1.3071 |
The average Malmquist index in the Qingyuan city in 2017-2023
Year | Effch | Techch | Pech | Sech | Tfpch | Tfpch sort |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017-2018 | 1.0098 | 3.4217 | 1.0012 | 1.0115 | 3.4518 | 1 |
2018-2019 | 1.0006 | 1.5492 | 0.9985 | 1.0005 | 1.5504 | 2 |
2019-2020 | 0.5457 | 0.8676 | 1 | 0.5446 | 0.4736 | 6 |
2020-2021 | 1.8353 | 0.55 | 0.9989 | 1.8363 | 1.0124 | 3 |
2021-2022 | 1.0008 | 0.9555 | 0.9972 | 1.0003 | 0.9546 | 4 |
2022-2023 | 0.9993 | 0.7329 | 0.9975 | 0.9986 | 0.7362 | 5 |
Mean | 1.0653 | 1.3462 | 0.9989 | 1.0653 | 1.3632 |
The heterogeneity of urban and rural development of digital economy
Variable | East | Middle | West |
---|---|---|---|
Digital economic development | 0.12597*** | -0.08943*** | 0.06689*** |
Control variable | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Constant | 0.1842 | -0.27035 | 0.50986 |
Provincial fixation effect | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Year fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes |
N | 130 | 120 | 100 |
R2 | 0.91013 | 0.80212 | 0.78006 |
The results of variable regression
Variable | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 |
---|---|---|---|
Digital economic development | 0.05792*** | 0.05206*** | |
Factor configuration efficiency | 0.09597*** | 0.05918*** | |
Urban and rural integration development level | 0.03505*** | 0.03816*** | 0.03280*** |
Economic integration | -0.00085 | -0.00010 | -0.00102 |
Industry digitization | -0.00628 | -0.02207 | -0.00709 |
Digital industrialization | 0.04494*** | 0.06398*** | 0.04501*** |
Constant | -0.15904** | -0.20022** | -0.14399* |
Provincial fixation effect | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Year fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes |
N | 350 | 350 | 350 |
R2 | 0.85261 | 0.83024 | 0.86755 |
The average Malmquist index in Guangdong province in 2017-2023
City | Effch | Techch | Pech | Sech | Tfpch | Tfpch sort |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guangzhou | 0.998 | 0.7487 | 0.9981 | 0.9987 | 0.7467 | 20 |
Zhuhai | 1.0039 | 0.8709 | 0.9998 | 1.0071 | 0.8787 | 19 |
Shantou | 1.0011 | 0.9381 | 0.9994 | 0.9999 | 0.9382 | 18 |
Foshan | 1.0043 | 0.9764 | 1.0024 | 1.0035 | 0.9789 | 15 |
Shaoguan | 1.0016 | 1.0129 | 0.9998 | 1.0015 | 1.0136 | 14 |
Heyuan | 0.9984 | 0.9693 | 0.9993 | 1.0012 | 0.9734 | 17 |
Meizhou | 0.9992 | 1.023 | 1.0011 | 1.0008 | 1.0256 | 13 |
Huizhou | 1.0022 | 0.9754 | 1.0006 | 0.9977 | 0.9736 | 16 |
shantou | 1.0006 | 1.3904 | 1.0011 | 1.0008 | 1.3905 | 5 |
Dongguan | 1.0073 | 1.4423 | 1.005 | 1.0025 | 1.4524 | 1 |
Zhongshan | 1.0025 | 1.4243 | 1.0007 | 1.0012 | 1.4287 | 4 |
Jiangmen | 1.0055 | 1.4369 | 0.9971 | 1.0037 | 1.4417 | 3 |
Yangjiang | 1 | 1.3829 | 1 | 0.9985 | 1.3849 | 6 |
Zhanjiang | 1.002 | 1.2965 | 0.999 | 1.0006 | 1.2955 | 7 |
Maoming | 1.0022 | 1.2613 | 1 | 0.9993 | 1.2632 | 8 |
Zhaoqing | 0.9994 | 1.1845 | 0.9998 | 1.0011 | 1.1834 | 10 |
Qingyuan | 1.0012 | 1.1017 | 1.0018 | 1.0001 | 1.1018 | 12 |
Chaozhou | 0.9998 | 1.1555 | 1.0017 | 1.0015 | 1.1537 | 11 |
Jieyang | 1.0019 | 1.2303 | 1.0022 | 1.0008 | 1.2321 | 9 |
Cloud float | 1 | 1.4404 | 0.9992 | 0.9985 | 1.442 | 2 |
Mean | 1.0016 | 1.1631 | 1.0004 | 1.0010 | 1.1649 |
Urban and rural integration input output index system
Overall index | DEA coordinates | Index dimension | Index name |
---|---|---|---|
Urban and rural integrated development level measure system | Input index | Digital economic development | Urban and rural industrial integration |
Factor configuration efficiency | Urban and rural social security coverage | ||
Urban and rural integration development level | Level of land urbanization | ||
Digital economic development level measure system | Output indicator | Digital infrastructure | Internet penetration |
Industry digitization | Digital financial development | ||
Digital industrialization | Telecommunications revenue |