Real-time monitoring and deep learning prediction modeling of rainfall infiltration effects in slope stability risk assessment

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

The orthogonal design factors and levels of the stability analysis are used

Influencing factor	Level
	1	2	3	4
Solar rainfall (mm)	100	200	300	400
Heavy (kN/m3)	17.31	19.04	19.62	20.18
Cohesive (kPa)	7	10	13	16
Internal friction Angle	15	18	20	22
Saturation coefficient(m/hr)	0.007	0.014	0.018	0.022
Saturated volume moisture content(%)	32	36	42	46
Crack depth (m)	0.5	1	1.5	2
POE high (m)	15	30	45	60
Slope ratio	1:1.2	1:1.6	1:1.8	1:2

The long slope open-dew parameters used in the analysis of stability

Severity (kN/m3)	Cohesion (kPa)	Interior friction Angle	Saturation coefficient(m/hr)	Saturated volume moisture content(%)
Same as the weathering layer	16.73	21.64	1.9×10-4	Same as the weathering layer

Training sample

Serial number	Solar rainfall (mm)	Heavy (kN/m3)	Cohesive (kPa)	Internal friction Angle	Saturation coefficient (m/hr)	Saturated volume moisture content (%)	Crack depth (m)	POE high (m)
1	90.2	17.49	8	19.51	0.0197	39.49	1.12	12.38
2	129.98	18.24	7.35	12.42	0.0151	35.44	0.84	27.72
3	82.6	19.58	9.75	17.27	0.0178	38.99	1.24	28.85
4	116.97	19.25	7.77	7.25	0.0222	38.31	1.13	11.39
5	86.01	15.87	8.59	21.07	0.0155	36.07	1.32	29.78
6	97.59	17.5	8.74	14.55	0.016	38.94	1.18	32.94
7	97.47	20.42	8.73	16.85	0.0112	29.64	1.41	29.97
8	100.16	22.07	8.41	10.73	0.0159	37.48	1.14	25.69
9	106.46	21.97	9.45	14.98	0.0048	34.92	1.39	24.22
10	66.79	16.76	9.44	14.51	0.0131	34.14	1.42	28.87
11	108.81	15.53	7.78	15.5	0.0144	38.53	1.19	22.37
12	112.55	14.54	9.55	13.91	0.0117	30.55	1.49	8.59
13	74.15	14.66	6.61	18.85	0.0125	32.1	1	24.29
14	118.54	13.84	8.87	15.93	0.0123	35.94	1.4	12.48
15	126.51	16.78	9.33	17.18	0.0111	39.56	1.16	21.68
16	85.62	19.62	7.83	15.85	0.0122	33.49	1.33	25.66
17	103.12	17.27	11.42	15.72	0.0137	34.36	1.39	37.05
18	93.1	16.85	7.31	19.34	0.023	37.04	1.32	20.32
19	104.98	16.62	7.9	16	0.0119	36.74	1.22	19.32
20	90.94	20.59	7.49	16.06	0.0173	40.67	1.42	26.07
21	97.5	14.73	5.25	17.06	0.0168	41.39	1.29	29.27
22	112.17	15.97	8.9	17.62	0.0219	33.95	1.4	24.37
23	108.86	17.46	8.92	14.16	0.0132	34.26	1.12	33.65
24	93.44	19.02	9.92	18.15	0.0164	37.54	1.45	17.35
25	104.8	17.32	7.58	16.95	0.0184	36.09	1.21	15.36
26	84.1	16.72	9.21	11.24	0.015	37.37	1.32	36.66
27	120.65	15.51	10.29	14.99	0.0136	40.14	0.94	27.44
28	118.06	19.82	5.87	20.39	0.0141	35.17	1.15	22.84
29	108.23	18.02	9.4	15.31	0.0121	39.23	1.06	27.27
30	113.38	20.08	10.84	13.75	0.0128	26.09	1.25	16.44
31	101.19	15.93	7.03	13.41	0.017	35.65	1.34	33.17
32	102.99	16.42	7.61	15.28	0.0049	34.91	1.23	10.22

The prediction of the model in a stable state

Serial number	Solar rainfall (mm)	Heavy (kN/m3)	Cohesive (kPa)	Internal friction Angle	Saturation coefficient (m/hr)	Saturated volume moisture content (%)	Crack depth (m)	POE high (m)
1	90.453	18.822	8.609	19.818	0.01984	40.866	1.1408	13.0754
2	130.233	19.572	7.959	12.728	0.01524	36.816	0.8608	28.4154
3	82.853	20.912	10.359	17.578	0.01794	40.366	1.2608	29.5454
4	117.223	20.582	8.379	7.558	0.02234	39.686	1.1508	12.0854
5	86.263	17.202	9.199	21.378	0.01564	37.446	1.3408	30.4754

The results of the model in the test library

Serial number	Solar rainfall (mm)	Heavy (kN/m3)	Cohesive (kPa)	Internal friction Angle	Saturation coefficient (m/hr)	Saturated volume moisture content (%)	Crack depth (m)	POE high (m)
1	90.43	18.61	8.59	19.79	0.01982	40.75	1.138	13.0742
2	130.21	19.36	7.94	12.7	0.01522	36.7	0.858	28.4142
3	82.83	20.7	10.34	17.55	0.01792	40.25	1.258	29.5442
4	117.2	20.37	8.36	7.53	0.02232	39.57	1.148	12.0842
5	86.24	16.99	9.18	21.35	0.01562	37.33	1.338	30.4742

The experimental results in the calculation of the model

Serial number	Rainfall duration(h)	Lift up	grade	Cohesive force	Internal friction	Saturated volume moisture content(%)	Crack depth (m)	POE high (m)
0	0	20	40	10.04	15.26	35.21	1.418	25.064
1	8	20	40	10.03	14.79	35.52	1.138	34.344
2	16	20	40	10.37	15.78	38.8	1.468	18.412
3	24	20	40	10.14	14.19	37.35	1.228	16.232