Research on the Development of Green Logistics Under the New Quality Productivity

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Evaluation Results of New Quality Logistics Productivity

Years	Benefit Ratio Value (Q)	Ranking
2012	1	10
2013	0.834670916	9
2014	0.58491405	7
2015	0.490701892	6
2016	0.442801545	5
2017	0.322976099	3
2018	0.610526433	8
2019	0.411178388	4
2020	0.063410033	1
2021	0.205734809	2

Evaluation Indicators System for Traditional Logistics

Primary Indicator	Secondary Indicator	Attribute
Green Logistics Environment (X1)	Per Capita Gross Domestic Product (C1)	+
	Social Retail Sales (C2)	+
	Resident Consumption Expenditure (C3)	+
	Resident Disposable Income (C4)	+
	Highway Transport Route Length (C5)	+
	Freight Volume by Highway (C6)	+
Green Logistics Strength (X2)	Railway Transport Route Length (C7)	+
	Railway Freight Volume (C8)	+
	Inland Waterway Navigation Mileage (C9)	+
	Waterway Freight Volume (C10)	+
	Passenger Turnover (C11)	+
	Cargo Turnover (C12)	+
Green Logistics Level (X3)	Total Energy Consumption of Logistics Industry (C13)	-
	Carbon Emission Intensity of Logistics Industry (C14)	-

Combined Weights

Indicator	Combined Weight w	Indicator	Combined Weight w
Per Capita GDP	0.056	Railway Freight Volume	0.125
Total Retail Sales	0.039	Inland Waterway Navigation Length	0.268
Per Capita Consumption Expenditure	0.044	Waterway Freight Volume	0.045
Per Capita Disposable Income	0.047	Passenger Turnaround	0.092
Highway Transportation Route Length	0.035	Cargo Turnaround	0.041
Highway Freight Volume	0.062	Total Energy Consumption of Logistics Industry	0.050
Railway Transportation Line Length	0.034	Logistics Industry Carbon Emission Intensity	0.062

Technological Innovation Capability Evaluation Indicators

Criteria Level	Primary Indicators	Secondary Indicators	Attributes
Technological Innovation Capability		R&D funding in the logistics industry A1	+
		Number of large-scale logistics enterprises with R&D.A2	+
	Innovation	Number of R&D personnel in the logistics industry A3	+
		Number of R&D institutions in the logistics industry A4	+
	Openness	Number of foreign patent technologies introduced A5	-

Evaluation of New Quality Productive Logistics SRT

Years	Group Effect Value(S)	Individual Regret Value(R)	Actual Utility Value(T)
2012	0.746750551	0.136500000	0.662557547
2013	0.682208261	0.127290508	0.543409795
2014	0.598696389	0.102552243	0.436508507
2015	0.614867339	0.087197143	0.409114444
2016	0.584553040	0.082352857	0.399317391
2017	0.499201548	0.068151687	0.397362823
2018	0.557601598	0.104584677	0.485860686
2019	0.472332469	0.084569524	0.415542141
2020	0.327073343	0.058537388	0.222468460
2021	0.197739411	0.084070000	0.318927829

Logistics Evaluation Index System under the New Quality Productive Forces

Criteria Level	Primary Indicators	Secondary Indicators	Attributes
Technological Innovation Capability		R&D funding in the logistics industry A1	+
		Number of large-scale logistics enterprises with R&D. A2	+
	Innovation	Number of R&D personnel in the logistics industry A3	+
		Number of R&D institutions in the logistics industry A4	+
	Openness	Number of foreign patent technologies introduced A5	-
Evaluation Indicators for Digital Informatization Level		Degree of Environmental Collaborative Governance A6	+
	Coordination	Proportion of GDP in the Logistics Industry A7	+
		Level of Logistics Data Center Construction A8	+
	Sharing	Completeness of Logistics Information Sharing Policies A9	+
		Degree of Information Sharing in the Logistics Chain A10	+
Evaluation Index of Environmental Friendliness Index		The Logistics Industry Energy Consumption A11	+
	Green	Carbon emission index of logistics industry A12	+
		Solid Waste Utilization Rate in the Logistics Industry A13	+
		Number of Air Pollution Control Facilities in the Logistics Industry A14	+

Optimal and Worst Values

S-	S+	R-	R+	T-	T+
0.259	0.720	0.072	0.155	0.015	0.188

Evaluation Index of Environmental Friendliness Index

Criteria Level	Primary Indicators	Secondary Indicators	Attributes
Evaluation Index of Environmental Friendliness Index	Green	The Logistics Industry Energy ConsumptionA11	+
		Carbon emission index of logistics industry A12	+
		Solid Waste Utilization Rate in the Logistics Industry A13	+
		Number of Air Pollution Control Facilities in the Logistics Industry A14	+

Evaluation Indicators for Digital Informatization Level

Criteria Level	Primary Indicators	Secondary Indicators	Attributes
Evaluation Indicators for Digital Informatization Level		Degree of Environmental Collaborative GovernanceA6	+
	Coordination	Proportion of GDP in the Logistics IndustryA7	+
		Level of Logistics Data Center ConstructionA8	+
	Sharing	Completeness of Logistics Information Sharing PoliciesA9	+
		Degree of Information Sharing in the Logistics ChainA10	+

Traditional Logistics Evaluation Results

Years	Benefit Ratio Value (Q)	Sort
2012	0.7764402464613	9
2013	0.8209447358420	10
2014	0.6644035100802	8
2015	0.5738066455416	6
2016	0.4005149694325	4
2017	0.2378465154588	3
2018	0.1371442767316	2
2019	0.0473493269012	1
2020	0.6473555257813	7
2021	0.4752411025057	5

Group Utility Values, Individual Regret Values, Actual Utility Values

Years	Group Effect Value	Individual Regret Value	Actual Utility Value
2012	0.6926794782977048	0.08381216275799874	0.1881485561926
2013	0.7205476930873459	0.09600960096009600	0.1821813262456
2014	0.6537981761404902	0.09200810563354571	0.1415768058347
2015	0.6266991034313488	0.08800671938117428	0.1158834034903
2016	0.5536015156307172	0.07250725072507250	0.0848030826387
2017	0.454508470030696	0.07198891151167316	0.0491690872252
2018	0.3565798706743576	0.08280828082808280	0.0266547850182
2019	0.3157077696099502	0.07185184058589770	0.0154238363018
2020	0.3962961090627796	0.15471547154715470	0.1507570898956
2021	0.25886398903613694	0.14984652394061534	0.1308793843004