<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>Enhancing the technical methods of teaching physical instruction in the information age and building an ideal guarantee system for teaching physical instruction reform and innovation are essential components of higher education development. The construction path of the physical literacy teaching reform guarantee system is presented in this paper, along with the development of an evaluation model for the effects of physical instruction reform teaching. This model serves as the basis for evaluating the impact following the implementation of the physical instruction teaching reform. The assessment model relies on the hierarchy analysis approach, which also establishes the second-level fuzzy complete judgment matrix, creates the rubric set for the assessment of the teaching reform effect, and demonstrates the weight value of each indicator in the evaluation model. With respect to the research object in the case analysis of the CA University physical instruction teaching reformation effect, the evaluation’s overall rating is 0.693, and it receives a “good” grade. The 50-meter run, seated forward bending test, and BMI endurance test items showed significant differences (P&lt;0.05). Significant differences (P&lt;0.05) were also presented in the dimensions of athletic ability, athletic participation, athletic awareness, athletic character, and learning interest in physical instruction learning outcomes, except for the dimension of athletic participation interest.</p>
</abstract>

Enhancing the technical methods of teaching physical instruction in the information age and building an ideal guarantee system for teaching physical instruction reform and innovation are essential components of higher education development. The construction path of the physical literacy teaching reform guarantee system is presented in this paper, along with the development of an evaluation model for the effects of physical instruction reform teaching. This model serves as the basis for evaluating the impact following the implementation of the physical instruction teaching reform. The assessment model relies on the hierarchy analysis approach, which also establishes the second-level fuzzy complete judgment matrix, creates the rubric set for the assessment of the teaching reform effect, and demonstrates the weight value of each indicator in the evaluation model. With respect to the research object in the case analysis of the CA University physical instruction teaching reformation effect, the evaluation’s overall rating is 0.693, and it receives a “good” grade. The 50-meter run, seated forward bending test, and BMI endurance test items showed significant differences (P<0.05). Significant differences (P<0.05) were also presented in the dimensions of athletic ability, athletic participation, athletic awareness, athletic character, and learning interest in physical instruction learning outcomes, except for the dimension of athletic participation interest.

The Construction of Physical instruction Teaching Reform and Innovation Guarantee System in the Information Age

Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Enhancing the technical methods of teaching physical instruction in the information age and building an ideal guarantee system for teaching physical...

The Construction of Physical instruction Teaching Reform and Innovation Guarantee System in the Information Age

Online veröffentlicht: 22. Mai 2024

Seitenbereich: -

Eingereicht: 17. Feb. 2024

Akzeptiert: 27. Apr. 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1198

Schlüsselwörter
Hierarchical analysis, Judgment matrix, Teaching reform, Teaching reform evaluation model

© 2024 Bo Dong, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The Construction of Physical instruction Teaching Reform and Innovation Guarantee System in the Information Age

Online veröffentlicht: 22. Mai 2024

Seitenbereich: -

Eingereicht: 17. Feb. 2024

Akzeptiert: 27. Apr. 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1198

SchlüsselwörterHierarchical analysis, Judgment matrix, Teaching reform, Teaching reform evaluation model

© 2024 Bo Dong, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Schlüsselwörter
Hierarchical analysis, Judgment matrix, Teaching reform, Teaching reform evaluation model