Research on Precision Education Management Strategies for College Students Based on the Background of Informatization Innovation and Entrepreneurship

[1] Alsharhan, A., & Aburayya, S. A. S. A. (2021). Using e-learning factors to predict student performance in the practice of precision education. Allied Business Academies. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Srivastava, S., Panda, S., & Williams, W. A. (2022). User-entrepreneurship and innovation: does customer involvement and learning orientation matter?. Journal of business & industrial marketing. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Paladino, A. (2022). Innovation or entrepreneurship: which conies first? exploring the implications for higher education. Journal of product innovation management. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Ju, X. H. (2019). Research on the strategies of improving college students’ comprehensive ability of innovation and entrepreneurship. DEStech Transactions on Social Science Education and Human Science. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Shuli, Z., Hua, Z., & Junlin, W. (2018). Cognition and system construction of civil engineering innovation and entrepreneurship system in emerging engineering education. Cognitive Systems Research, 52. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Paiva, R., Ferreira, M., & Frade, M. (2017). Intelligent tutorial system based on personalized system of instruction to teach or remind mathematical concepts. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(4), 370-381. Search in Google Scholar

[7] María Consuelo, Sáiz-Manzanares, César Ignacio, García Osorio, José Francisco, Díez-Pastor, & Luis Jorge, Martín Antón. (2019). Information discovery and delivery will personalized e-learning increase deep learning in higher education? article information: for authors will personalized e-learning increase deep learning in higher education?. Interlending & document supply, 47(1), 53-63. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Bu, J. C. C. A. (2020). Informality costs: informal entrepreneurship and innovation in emerging economies. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 14(3). Search in Google Scholar

[9] Litau, E. Y. (2022). Patterns of behavioural preferences in innovation and project activities. Journal of organizational change management. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Asad, R., Altaf, S., Ahmad, S., Mahmoud, H., Huda, S., & Iqbal, S., et al. (2023). Machine Learning-Based Hybrid Ensemble Model Achieving Precision Education for Online Education Amid the Lockdown Period of COVID-19 Pandemic in Pakistan. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Aykan, E., Gül Karaku, & Karako, H. (2019). The effect of university students’ individual innovation and lifelong learning trends on entrepreneurship orientation. Sustainability, 11. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Ge, C. (2016). Research and practice on innovation and entrepreneurship education in colleges and universities based on professional perspective. International Journal of Technology, Management. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Yan, X., Gu, D., Liang, C., Zhao, S., & Lu, W. (2018). Fostering sustainable entrepreneurs: evidence from china college students’ “internet plus” innovation and entrepreneurship competition (csipc). Sustainability, 10(9). Search in Google Scholar

[14] Menekse, M. (2023). Envisioning the future of learning and teaching engineering in the artificial intelligence era: opportunities and challenges. Journal of engineering education. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Zou, F., Chen, D., Xu, Q., Jiang, Z., & Kang, J. (2021). A two-stage personalized recommendation based on multi-objective teaching–learning-based optimization with decomposition. Neurocomputing, 452(6). Search in Google Scholar

[16] Gera, R., Saxena, A., Bartolf, D., & Tick, S. (2021). A network science perspective to personalized learning. arXiv e-prints. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Shatnawi, R., Althebyan, Q., Ghaleb, B., & Al-Maolegi, M. (2021). A student advising system using association rule mining. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 16. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Lu, X., Zhu, Y., Xu, Y., & Yu, J. (2021). Learning from multiple dynamic graphs of student and course interactions for student grade predictions. Neurocomputing, 431, 23-33. Search in Google Scholar