[1. Saiki RK, Scharf S, Faloona F, et al. Enzymatic amplification of β-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science (80- ). 1985 Dec 20;230(4732):1350–4.10.1126/science.29999802999980]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Pavón MÁ, López-Calleja IM, González I, Martín R, García T. Targeting conserved genes in Alternaria species. In: Methods in Molecular Biology. Humana Press Inc.; 2017. p. 123–9.10.1007/978-1-4939-6707-0_627924533]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, et al. The MIQE Guidelines: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments. Clin Chem. 2009 Apr 1;55(4):611–22.10.1373/clinchem.2008.11279719246619]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Bustin SA, Wittwer CT. MIQE: A Step Toward More Robust and Reproducible Quantitative PCR. Clin Chem. 2017 Sep 1;63(9):1537–8.10.1373/clinchem.2016.26895328606913]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Witte AK, Sickha R, Mester P, Fister S, Schoder D, Rossmanith P. Essential role of polymerases for assay performance – Impact of polymerase replacement in a well-established assay. Biomol Detect Quantif. 2018 Dec 1;16:12–20.10.1016/j.bdq.2018.10.002628753730560063]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Mojtahedi M, Fouquier D’h´Eroü El A, Huang S. Direct elicitation of template concentration from quantification cycle (C q ) distributions in digital PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:126.10.1093/nar/gku603417634525104023]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Czurda S, Smelik S, Preuner-Stix S, Nogueira F, Lion T. Occurrence of fungal DNA contamination in PCR reagents: Approaches to control and decontamination. J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Jan 1;54(1):148–52.10.1128/JCM.02112-15470271226560539]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Buzard GS, Baker D, Wolcott MJ, Norwood DA, Dauphin LA. Multi-platform comparison of ten commercial master mixes for probe-based real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of bioterrorism threat agents for surge preparedness. Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Nov 30;223(1–3):292-7.10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.10.00323107058]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Johnston AD, Lu J, Ru K lin, Korbie D, Trau M. PrimerROC: accurate condition-independent dimer prediction using ROC analysis. Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 1;9(1):1–14.10.1038/s41598-018-36612-9633877130659212]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Laible M, Schlombs K, Kaiser K, et al. Technical validation of an RT-qPCR in vitro diagnostic test system for the determination of breast cancer molecular subtypes by quantification of ERBB2, ESR1, PGR and MKI67 mRNA levels from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens. BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 7;16(1):398.10.1186/s12885-016-2476-x493630027389414]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2 Assay (EUA), [Internet]. Available from: molecular.abbott.com, [Accessed 25 July 2020].]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Cobas® SARS-CoV-2 Test, [Internet]. Available from: diagnostics.roche.com, [Accessed 25 July 2020].]Search in Google Scholar
[13. TaqPath COVID-19 CE-IVD RT-PCR Kit Frequently Asked Questions, Version 1.0, [Internet]. Available from: thermofisher.com, [Accessed 25 July 2020].s]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Picard-Meyer E, Peytavin de Garam C, Schereffer JL, Robardet E, Cliquet F. Evaluation of six TaqMan RT-rtPCR kits on two thermocyclers for the reliable detection of rabies virus RNA. J Vet Diagnostic Investig. 2019 Jan 12;31(1):47–57.10.1177/1040638718818223650576730541405]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Pavšič J, Žel J, Milavec M. Assessment of the real-time PCR and different digital PCR platforms for DNA quantification. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016 Jan 31;408(1):107–21.10.1007/s00216-015-9107-2470684626521179]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Lion T. Current recommendations for positive controls in RT-PCR assays. Leukemia. 2001 Jul 19;15(7):1033–7.10.1038/sj.leu.240213311455970]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Ruhanya V, Jacobs GB, Glashoff RH, Engelbrecht S. Clinical relevance of total HIV DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cell compartments as a biomarker of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND). Vol. 9, Viruses. MDPI AG; 2017. p. 324.10.3390/v9110324570753129088095]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Gomez LF, Torres IP, Del Pilar M, et al. Detection of Histoplasma capsulatum in Organic Fertilizers by Hc100 Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction and Its Correlation with the Physicochemical and Microbiological Characteristics of the Samples. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;98(5):1303–12.10.4269/ajtmh.17-0214595335229532772]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Wagner EM. Monitoring gene expression: Quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1027:19–45.10.1007/978-1-60327-369-5_223912981]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Buckwalter SP, Sloan LM, Cunningham SA, et al. Inhibition controls for qualitative real-time PCR assays: Are they necessary for all specimen matrices? J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Jun 1;52(6):2139–43.10.1128/JCM.03389-13404277524740078]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Roux G, Ravel C, Varlet-Marie E, Jendrowiak R, Bastien P, Sterkers Y. Inhibition of polymerase chain reaction: Pathogen-specific controls are better than human gene amplification. Marangoni A, editor. PLoS One. 2019 Sep 27;14(9):e0219276.10.1371/journal.pone.0219276676467731560697]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Miranda JA, Steward GF. Variables influencing the efficiency and interpretation of reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR): An empirical study using Bacteriophage MS2. J Virol Methods. 2017 Mar 1;241:1–10.10.1016/j.jviromet.2016.12.00227940257]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Liu J, Gratz J, Amour C, et al. Optimization of Quantitative PCR Methods for Enteropathogen Detection. Chan KH, editor. PLoS One. 2016 Jun 23;11(6):e0158199.10.1371/journal.pone.0158199491895227336160]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Aralar A, Yuan Y, Chen K, et al. Improving quantitative power in digital PCR through digital high-resolution melting. J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jun 1;58(6).10.1128/JCM.00325-20726939432295887]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Schwaber J, Andersen S, Nielsen L. Shedding light: The importance of reverse transcription efficiency standards in data interpretation. Biomol Detect Quantif. 2019;17:100077.10.1016/j.bdq.2018.12.002637495030805297]Search in Google Scholar
[26. De Spiegelaere W, Dern-Wieloch J, Weigel R, et al. Reference Gene Validation for RT-qPCR, a Note on Different Available Software Packages. Cotterill S, editor. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 31;10(3):e0122515.10.1371/journal.pone.0122515438043925825906]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Pharo HD, Andresen K, Berg KCG, Lothe RA, Jeanmougin M, Lind GE. A robust internal control for high-precision DNA methylation analyses by droplet digital PCR. Clin Epigenetics. 2018 Feb 21;10(1):24.10.1186/s13148-018-0456-5582255829484034]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Neduvat AC, Murthy PM, Sundarrajan S, Padmanabhan S. Use of coagulation factor XIII (F13) gene as an internal control for normalization of genomic DNA’s for HLA typing. MethodsX. 2018 Jan 1;5:881–9.10.1016/j.mex.2018.07.020610788930151348]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Caracausi M, Piovesan A, Antonaros F, Strippoli P, Vitale L, Pelleri MC. Systematic identification of human housekeeping genes possibly useful as references in gene expression studies. Mol Med Rep. 2017 Sep 1;16(3):2397–410.10.3892/mmr.2017.6944554805028713914]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Glöckner FO, Yilmaz P, Quast C, et al. 25 years of serving the community with ribosomal RNA gene reference databases and tools. Vol. 261, Journal of Biotechnology. Elsevier B.V.; 2017. p. 169–76.10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.06.119828648396]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002 Jun 18;3(7):research0034.1.10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research003412623912184808]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Mestdagh P, Van Vlierberghe P, De Weer A, et al. A novel and universal method for microRNA RT-qPCR data normalization. Genome Biol. 2009 Jun 16;10(6):R64.10.1186/gb-2009-10-6-r64271849819531210]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Pfaffl MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians TP. Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper - Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett. 2004 Mar;26(6):509–15.10.1023/B:BILE.0000019559.84305.47]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Andersen CL, Jensen JL, Ørntoft TF. Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: A model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res. 2004 Aug 1;64(15):5245–50.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-049615289330]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Hruz T, Wyss M, Docquier M, et al. RefGenes: Identification of reliable and condition specific reference genes for RT-qPCR data normalization. BMC Genomics. 2011 Mar 21;12(1):156.10.1186/1471-2164-12-156307295821418615]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Gao Z, Deng W, Zhu F. Reference gene selection for quantitative gene expression analysis in black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens). Bhat SA, editor. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 16;14(8):e0221420.10.1371/journal.pone.0221420669732931419256]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Leal MF, Belangero PS, Figueiredo EA, et al. Identification of Suitable Reference Genes for Gene Expression Studies in Tendons from Patients with Rotator Cuff Tear. Datti A, editor. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 13;10(3):e0118821.10.1371/journal.pone.0118821435892125768100]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Rho HW, Lee BC, Choi ES, Choi IJ, Lee YS, Goh SH. Identification of valid reference genes for gene expression studies of human stomach cancer by reverse transcription-qPCR. BMC Cancer. 2010 May 28;10(1):240.10.1186/1471-2407-10-240288740320507635]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Montero-Melendez T, Perretti M. Gapdh gene expression is modulated by inflammatory arthritis and is not suitable for qPCR normalization. Inflammation. 2014 Feb 4;37(4):1059–69.10.1007/s10753-014-9829-x24493325]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Al-Sabah A, Stadnik P, Gilbert SJ, Duance VC, Blain EJ. Importance of reference gene selection for articular cartilage mechanobiology studies. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2016 Apr 1;24(4):719–30.10.1016/j.joca.2015.11.007481945126585242]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Lee EJ, Schmittgen TD. Comparison of RNA assay methods used to normalize cDNA for quantitative real-time PCR. Anal Biochem. 2006;357:299–301.10.1016/j.ab.2006.06.01116930526]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Ho-Pun-Cheung A, Cellier D, Lopez-Crapez E. La RT-qPCR en oncologïe: Considérations pour la normalisation. Vol. 66, Annales de Biologie Clinique. Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2008. p. 121–9.]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Libus J, Štorchová H. Quantification of cDNA generated by reverse transcription of total RNA provides a simple alternative tool for quantitative RT-PCR normalization. Biotechniques. 2006 Aug 21;41(2):156–64.10.2144/00011223216925017]Search in Google Scholar