[
1. Whyte A, Boeddinghaus R. The maxillary sinus: physiology, development and imaging anatomy. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48:20190205.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Lata S, Mohanty SK, Vinay S et al. Is Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) a Potential Imaging Tool in ENT Practice?: A Cross-Sectional Survey Among ENT Surgeons in the State of Odisha, India. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;70:130-6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Zhu J, Lin W, Yuan W, Chen L. New Insight on Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Odontogenic Maxillary Sinusitis. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2021;6: Article ID 9997180.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Luz J, Greutmann D, Wiedemeier D et al. 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Implant Dent. 2018:4:17.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Mudgade DK, Motghare PC, Kunjir GU et al. Prevalence of anatomical variations in maxillary sinus using cone beam computed tomography. J Indian Academy Oral Med Radiol. 2018;30:18-23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Tyndall DA, Price JB, Tetradis S et al. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;113:817-26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Kumar M, Shanavas M, Sidappa A, Kiran M. Cone beam computed tomography – know its secrets. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7:64-8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Dedeoğlu N, Altun O. Evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomical variations and pathologies in elderly, young, posterior dentate and edentulous patient groups with cone-beam computed tomography. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2019;78:595-59.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Shahidi S, Zamiri B, Momeni Danaei S et al. Evaluation of Anatomic Variations in Maxillary Sinus with the Aid of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in a Population in South of Iran. J Dent (Shiraz). 2016;17:7-15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Orhan K, Kusakci Seker B, Aksoy S et al. Cone beam CT evaluation of maxillary sinus septa prevalence, height, location and morphology in children and an adult population. Med Princ Pract. 2013;22:47-53.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Kim MJ, Jung UW, Kim CS et al. Maxillary sinus septa: prevalence, height, location, and morphology. A reformatted computed tomography scan analysis. J Periodontol. 2006;77:903-8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Khalighi Sigaroudi A, Dalili Kajan Z, Rastgar S, Neshandar Asli H. Frequency of different maxillary sinus septal patterns found on cone-beam computed tomography and predicting the associated risk of sinus membrane perforation during sinus lifting. Imaging Sci Dent. 2017;47:261-7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Koymen R, Gocmen-Mas N, Karacayli U et al. Anatomic evaluation of maxillary sinus septa: surgery and radiology. Clin Anat. 2009;22:563-70.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Al-Zahrani MS, Al-Ahmari MM, Al-Zahrani AA, et al. Prevalence and morphological variations of maxillary sinus septa in different age groups: a CBCT analysis. Ann Saudi Med. 2020; 40: 200–6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Pommer B, Ulm C, Lorenzoni M et al. Prevalence, location and morphology of maxillary sinus septa: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2012;39:769-73.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Jain V, Mathur VP, Pillai RS, Kalra S. A preliminary study to find out maximum occlusal bite force in Indian individuals. Indian J Dent Res. 2014;25:325-30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Alhumaidan G, Eltahir MA, Shaikh SS. Retrospective analysis of maxillary sinus septa – A cone beam computed tomography study. Saudi Dent J. 2021;33:467-473.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Dandekeri SS, Hegde C, Kavassery P et al. CBCT Study of Morphologic Variations of Maxillary Sinus Septa in Relevance to Sinus Augmentation Procedures. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2020;10:51-56.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Caversaccio M, Boschung U, Mudry A. Historical review of Haller’s cells. Ann Anat 2011;193:185-90.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Kamdi P, Nimma V, Ramchandani A et al. Evaluation of haller cell on CBCT and its association with maxillary sinus pathologies. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2018;30:41.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Mathew R, Omami G, Hand A et al. Cone beam CT analysis of Haller cells: prevalence and clinical significance. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42:20130055.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Pekiner FN, Borahan MO, Dumlu A, Özbayrak S. Infraorbital ethmoid (Haller) cells: a cone-beam computed tomographic study. Oral Radiol. 2014;30:219-25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Raina A, Guledgud MV, Patil K. Infraorbital ethmoid (Haller’s) cells: a panoramic radiographic study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012;41:305-8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Ozcan KM, Selcuk A, Oruk V et al. Ethmomaxillary sinus. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;265:185-8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Zhou F, Cao C, Fan W et al. The imaging anatomy of ethmomaxillary sinus and its impact on chronic rhinosinusitis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;278:719-726.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Liu J, Dai J, Wen X et al. Imaging and anatomical features of ethmomaxillary sinus and its differentiation from surrounding air cells. Surg Radiol Anat. 2018;40:207-215.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Dasar U, Gokce E. Evaluation of variations in sinonasal region with computed tomography. World J Radiol. 2016;8: 98-108.
]Search in Google Scholar
, und | 26. Okt. 2022