[
Allmendinger, P., & Houghton, G. (2009). Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: The new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway. Environment and Planning A, 41, 617–33.10.1068/a40208
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Basboga, K. (2020). A theme-based analysis of the intensity of cross-border cooperation across Europe. Journal of Borderlands Studies. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2020.183323010.1080/08865655.2020.1833230
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Birnie, E., & Hitchens, D. (1997). The potential for a Belfast–Dublin Economic Corridor. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 2 (2), 167–87.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Birrell, D. (2006). Local authorities and managing cross border projects. In J. Yarwood (Ed.), The Dublin–Belfast Development Corridor, Ireland’s mega-city region? Aldershot: Ashgate.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Birrell, D., & Hayes A. (2001). Cross-border co-operation in local government development, management and reconciliation. Armagh: Centre for Cross-Border Studies.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bradley, J. (1997). Exploring long-term social and economic consequences of peace and reconciliation in the island of Ireland. In Forum for Peace & Reconciliation: Consultancy Studies, 4. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Broadhurst, K., Ferreira, J., & Berkeley, N. (2021). Place leadership: Developing a model to guide regional partnerships. Regional Studies, 55 (3), 556–67. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2020.183634310.1080/00343404.2020.1836343
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coakley, J., Ó Caoindealbháin, B., & Wilson, R. (2007). The operation of the North–South implementation bodies. In J. Coakley & L. O’Dowd (Eds), Crossing the border: New relationships between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland (pp. 31–60.). Dublin: Irish Academic Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coopers & Lybrand/Indecon. (1994). A corridor of opportunity: Study of the feasibility of developing a Dublin–Belfast Economic Corridor. Dublin & Belfast: IBEC and CBI NI.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Department of Housing, Planning and Local Government. (2018). Project Ireland 2040: National planning framework. Dublin: Department of Housing, Planning and Local Government.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Department of Regional Development NI and Department of Environment, Community and Local Government. (2013). Framework for co-operation: Spatial strategies of Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Retrieved from https://www.infrastructure-ni.gov.uk/sites/default/files/publications/drd/spatial-strategy-framework.pdf [28 October 2021].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
de Vries, J., & Priemus, H. (2003). Mega-corridors in North West Europe: Issues for spatial governance. Journal of Transport Geography, 11, 225–33.10.1016/S0966-6923(03)00033-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
East Border Region. (2021). Ireland/Northern Ireland charter and protocols. Newry: East Border Region.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ESPON. (2015). European towns and territorial cohesion. Retrieved from https://www.espon.eu/topics-policy/publications/maps-month/european-towns-and-territorial-cooperation [28 October 2021].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gonzaléz-Gómez, T., & Gualda, E. (2014). Cross-border networks in informal and formal cooperation in the border regions Andalusia–Algarve–Alentejo and Estonia–South Finland. European Planning Studies, 22 (7), 1407–24. doi: 10-1080/09654313.78948710.1080/09654313.2013.789487
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Government of Ireland. (2021). National development plan 2021–2030. Dublin: Government of Ireland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hall, P. (2008). Opportunities for democracy in cross-border regions? Lessons from the Øresund region. Regional Studies, 42 (3), 423–35. doi:10.1080/0034340070128159210.1080/00343400701281592
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hansen, P., & Serin, G. (2010). Rescaling or institutional flexibility? The experience of the cross-border Øresund region. Regional and Federal Studies, 20 (2), 201–27. doi: 10.1080/1359756100373164610.1080/13597561003731646
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harrison, J. (2020). Seeing like a business: Rethinking the role of business in regional development, planning and governance. Territory, Politics, Governance. doi:10.1080/21622671.2020.17432010.1080/21622671.2020.1743201
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 71 (1), 3–17. doi: 10.2307/49050310.2307/490503
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hayward, K., & Magennis, E. (2014). The business of building peace: Private sector cooperation across the Irish border. Irish Political Studies, 29 (1), 154–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2013.87589610.1080/07907184.2013.875896
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herrschel, T. (2009). City regions, polycentricity and the construction of peripheralities through governance. Urban Research and Practice, 2 (3), 240–50. doi: 10.1080/1753506090331910310.1080/17535060903319103
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hornung-Draus, R. (2021). Cross-border social dialogue from the perspective of employers. European Labour Law Journal, 12 (1), 83–94.10.1177/2031952520908440
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ilbery, B., & Saxena, G. (2011). Integrated rural tourism in the English–Welsh cross-border region: An analysis of strategic, administrative and personal challenges. Regional Studies, 45 (8), 1139–55.10.1080/00343404.2010.486785
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Indecon. (2010). M1 Economic Corridor development study: A report for Fingal, Meath and Louth County Councils. Dublin: Indecon.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
International Centre for Local and Regional Development. (2009). The Newry–Dundalk Twin City Region – Supporting the implementation of cross-border collaborative frameworks. Armagh: International Centre for Local and Regional Development.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Irish Academy of Engineering. (2016). Dublin–Belfast Economic Corridor: A European growth hub on the island. Dublin: Irish Academy of Engineering.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kammerer, M., & Namhata, C. (2018). What drives the adoption of climate change mitigation policy? A dynamic network approach to policy diffusion. Policy Sciences, 51 (4), 477–513.10.1007/s11077-018-9332-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaucic, J., & Sohn, C. (2021). Mapping the cross-border cooperation ‘galaxy’: An exploration of scalar arrangements in Europe. European Planning Studies. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2021.192366710.1080/09654313.2021.1923667
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kennedy, M. (2000). Division and consensus: The politics of cross-border relations in Ireland, 1925–1969. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KPMG. (2014). Report on the Lord Mayors’ Forum, 28 March 2014. Belfast: KPMG.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kunaka, C., & Carruthers, R. (2014). Trade and transport corridor management toolkit. Washington, DC: World Bank.10.1596/978-1-4648-0143-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kurowska-Pysz, J. (2016). Opportunities for cross-border entrepreneurship development in a cluster model exemplified by the Polish–Czech border region. Sustainability, 8, 230.10.3390/su8030230
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lagana, G. (2020). EU Structural Funds Programmes on the island of Ireland: Interreg and the cross-border dimension. In G. Lagana, The European Union and the Northern Ireland peace process (pp. 105–31). Switzerland: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-59117-5_5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Magennis, E. (2007). Public policy cooperation: The common chapter – Shadow of substance? In J. Coakley & L. O’Dowd (Eds), Crossing the border (pp. 245–62). Dublin: Irish Academic Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Magennis, E. (2012). The impact of devolution on everyday life, 1999–2010: The case of cross-border commerce. In C. McGrattan & E. Meehan (Eds), Everyday life after the Irish conflict: The impact of devolution and cross-border cooperation (pp. 117–34). Manchester: Manchester University Press.10.7228/manchester/9780719087288.003.0008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mayer, M. (2008). To what end do we theorize sociospatial relations? Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26 (3), 414–19.10.1068/d9107d
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McArdle, P. (2013). The Newry–Dundalk twin city region: 10 recommendations for further action. Journal of Cross Border Studies, 8, 71–88.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mintrom, M. (2019). So you want to be a policy entrepreneur? Policy Design and Practice, 2 (4), 307–23.10.1080/25741292.2019.1675989
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Molotch, H. (1976). The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 309–22.10.1086/226311
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Murphy, M. C. (2018). Europe and Northern Ireland’s future: Negotiating Brexit’s unique case. London: Agenda Publishing.10.2307/j.ctv5cg7x3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nadin, V., Stead, D., Dąbrowski, M., & Fernandez-Maldonado, A. M. (2021). Integrated, adaptive and participatory spatial planning: Trends across Europe. Regional Studies, 55 (5), 791–80.10.1080/00343404.2020.1817363
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ó Beacháin, D. (2018). From partition to Brexit: The Irish government and Northern Ireland. Manchester: Manchester University Press.10.7765/9781526122780
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Dowd, L., McCall, C., & Damkat, I. (2007). Sustaining cross-border coopera tion? The public, private and civil society sectors. In J. Coakley & L. O’Dowd, Crossing the border (pp. 263–87). Dublin: Irish Academic Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Keeffe, B., & Creamer, C. (2019). Models of cross-border collaboration in a post-Brexit Landscape – Insights from external EU borders. Irish Geography, 52 (1). doi: 10.2014/igj.v52i1.1376
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Perkmann, M. (2007). Policy entrepreneurship and multi-level governance: A comparative study of European cross-border regions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25 (6), 861–79.10.1068/c60m
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Quigley, G. (2015). A time to speak. Belfast: Ulster Bank.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rafferty, G., & Blair, N. (2020). Emergent cross-border functional geographies on the island of Ireland: Pre- and post-Brexit. Irish Geography, 52 (2), 175–91.10.55650/igj.2019.1400
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roper, S. (2007). Cross-border and local cooperation on the island of Ireland. Political Geography, 26 (5), 554–74.10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.04.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rydin, Y. (2021). Governance theories: Stakeholders, networks and collaboration. In Y. Rydin, Theory in planning research. Planning, environment, cities. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saldert, H. (2021). Spanning boundaries between policy and practice: Strategic urban planning in Gothenburg, Sweden. Planning Theory and Practice, 22 (3), 397–413.10.1080/14649357.2021.1930120
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schönweitz, M. (2008). The Öresund Committee: Cross-border institution building in the Baltic Sea region. NordEuropaForum, 18 (2), 75–94.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scott, J. W. (1999). European and North American contexts for cross-border regionalism. Regional Studies, 33 (7), 605–17. doi: 10.1080/0034340995007865710.1080/00343409950078657
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stead, D., & Meijers, E. J. (2009). Spatial planning and policy integration: Concepts, facilitators and inhibitors. Planning Theory and Practice, 10 (3), 317–32.10.1080/14649350903229752
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stone, C. N. (1989). Regime politics, governing Atlanta. 1946–1988. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Svensson, P. (2019). Formalized policy entrepreneurship as a governance tool for policy integration. International Journal of Public Administration, 42 (14), 1212–21.10.1080/01900692.2019.1590401
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tannam, E. (1999). Cross-border cooperation in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland. Basingstoke: Macmillan.10.1057/9780230373532
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tannam, E. (2006). The European Union ‘model’ and administrative cooperation: The case of Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Public Administration, 84 (2), 407–22.10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00009.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Teague, P., Bew, P., & Patterson, H. (1997). Northern Ireland beyond war and peace. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tilly, C. (1985). Models and realities of popular collective action. Social Research, 52 (4), 717–47.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
True, J., & Mintrom, M. (2001). Transnational networks and policy diffusion: The case of gender mainstreaming. International Studies Quarterly, 45 (1), 27–57.10.1111/0020-8833.00181
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wachsmuth, D., & Kilfoil, P. (2021). Two logics of regionalism: The development of a regional imaginary in the Toronto–Waterloo Innovation Corridor. Regional Studies, 55 (1), 63–76. doi: 10.1080/00343404. 2020.181736210.1080/00343404.2020.1817362
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Waite, D. (2021). Agglomeration is in the eye of the beholder: The changing governance of polycentrism. Territory, Politics and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2021.188697810.1080/21622671.2021.1886978
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walsh, C. (2015). Creating a space for cooperation: Soft spaces, spatial planning and territorial cooperation on the island of Ireland. In P. Allmendinger, G. Haughton, J. Knieling & F. Othengrafen (Eds), Soft spaces in Europe: Re-negotiating governance, boundaries and borders (pp. 192–212). London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williams, B., Berry, J., & McGreal, S. (2006). The East Coast Corridor: Spatial development strategies for the Dublin–Belfast metropolitan regions. Journal of Irish Urban Studies, 1 (2), 19–31.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yarwood, J. (2006a). Overview and summary. In J. Yarwood (Ed.), The Dublin–Belfast Development Corridor, Ireland’s mega-city region? Aldershot: Ashgate.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yarwood, J. (2006b). Towards an hypothetical regional plan for the Dublin– Belfast Corridor. In J. Yarwood (Ed.), The Dublin–Belfast Development Corridor, Ireland’s mega-city region? Aldershot: Ashgate.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zimmerbauer, K. (2018). Supranational identities in planning. Regional Studies, 52 (7), 911–21.10.1080/00343404.2017.1360481
]Search in Google Scholar
