This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Francová, A., Chrastný, V., Vítková, M., Šillerová, H., Komárek M. (2020). Health risk assessment of metal(loid)s in soil and particulate matter from industrialized regions: A multidisciplinary approach. Environmental Pollution, 260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114057.FrancováA.ChrastnýV.VítkováM.ŠillerováH.KomárekM.2020Health risk assessment of metal(loid)s in soil and particulate matter from industrialized regions: A multidisciplinary approachEnvironmental Pollution260https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114057.Search in Google Scholar
Świelik R., Trojanowska M. (2022). Review Chemical Fractionation in Environmental Studies of Potentially Toxic Particulate-Bound Elements in Urban Air, Toxics; 10(3), 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10030124ŚwielikR.TrojanowskaM.2022Review Chemical Fractionation in Environmental Studies of Potentially Toxic Particulate-Bound Elements in Urban AirToxics103124https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10030124Search in Google Scholar
Paplińska-Goryca M., Misiukiewicz-Stępień P., Proboszcz M., Nejman-Gryz P., Górska K., Zajusz-Zubek E., Krenke R. (2021). Interactions of nasal epithelium with macrophages and dendritic cells variously alter urban PM-induced inflammation in healthy, asthma and COPD. Scientific Reports, (art. no. 13259). 11, 1–21. DOI:
10.1038/s41598-021-92626-w.Paplińska-GorycaM.Misiukiewicz-StępieńP.ProboszczM.Nejman-GryzP.GórskaK.Zajusz-ZubekE.KrenkeR.2021Interactions of nasal epithelium with macrophages and dendritic cells variously alter urban PM-induced inflammation in healthy, asthma and COPDScientific Reports(art. no. 13259).1112110.1038/s41598-021-92626-wOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mainka A., Zajusz-Zubek E. (2015). Indoor air quality in urban and rural preschools in Upper Silesia, Poland: particulate matter and carbon dioxide, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12, 7697–7711.MainkaA.Zajusz-ZubekE.2015Indoor air quality in urban and rural preschools in Upper Silesia, Poland: particulate matter and carbon dioxideInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1276977711Search in Google Scholar
Lopuszanska-Dawid M., Kołodziej H., Lipowicz A., Szklarska A., Kopiczko A., Bielicki T. (2020). Social class-specific secular trends in height among 19-year old Polish men: 6th national surveys from 1965 till 2010, Economics and Human Biology, 37, 100832. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31924589/.Lopuszanska-DawidM.KołodziejH.LipowiczA.SzklarskaA.KopiczkoA.BielickiT.2020Social class-specific secular trends in height among 19-year old Polish men: 6th national surveys from 1965 till 2010Economics and Human Biology37100832https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31924589/.Search in Google Scholar
PN-EN 14212:2013-02/AC:2014-06E Ambient air quality – Standard method for the measurement of the concentration of sulphur dioxide by ultraviolet fluorescence.PN-EN 14212:2013-02/AC:2014-06E Ambient air quality – Standard method for the measurement of the concentration of sulphur dioxide by ultraviolet fluorescenceSearch in Google Scholar
PN-EN 14211:2013-02 Ambient air quality - Standard method for the measurement of the concentration of nitrogen dioxide and nitrogen monoxide by chemiluminescence.PN-EN 14211:2013-02 Ambient air quality - Standard method for the measurement of the concentration of nitrogen dioxide and nitrogen monoxide by chemiluminescenceSearch in Google Scholar
PN-EN 12341:2014-07 Ambient air - Standard gravimetric measurement method for the determination of the PM10 or PM2,5 mass concentration of suspended particulate matter.PN-EN 12341:2014-07 Ambient air - Standard gravimetric measurement method for the determination of the PM10 or PM2,5 mass concentration of suspended particulate matterSearch in Google Scholar
Afshari, A., Mojahed M., Yusuff R. (2010). Simple Additive Weighting approach to personnel selection problem. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 1(5), 511–515.AfshariA.MojahedM.YusuffR.2010Simple Additive Weighting approach to personnel selection problemInternational Journal of Innovation and Technology Management.15511515Search in Google Scholar
Alinezhad, A., Sarrafha, K., Amini, A. (2014). Sensitivity analysis of SAW technique: the impact of changing the decision making matrix elements on the final ranking of alternatives. Iranian Journal of Operations Research, 5(1), 82–94.AlinezhadA.SarrafhaK.AminiA.2014Sensitivity analysis of SAW technique: the impact of changing the decision making matrix elements on the final ranking of alternativesIranian Journal of Operations Research.518294Search in Google Scholar
Chen, T.Y. (2012). Comparative analysis of SAW and TOPSIS based on interval-valued fuzzy sets: discussions on score functions and weight constraints. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(2), 1848–1861.ChenT.Y.2012Comparative analysis of SAW and TOPSIS based on interval-valued fuzzy sets: discussions on score functions and weight constraintsExpert Systems with Applications.39218481861Search in Google Scholar
Churchman, C.W., Ackoff, R.L. (1954). An approximate measure of value. Journal of Operations Research Society of America, 2(1), 172–187.ChurchmanC.W.AckoffR.L.1954An approximate measure of valueJournal of Operations Research Society of America.21172187Search in Google Scholar
Deni, W., Sudana, O., Sasmita, A. (2013). Analysis and implementation fuzzy multi-attribute decision making SAW method for selection of high achieving students in faculty level. International Journal of Computer Science, 10(1), 674–680.DeniW.SudanaO.SasmitaA.2013Analysis and implementation fuzzy multi-attribute decision making SAW method for selection of high achieving students in faculty levelInternational Journal of Computer Science.101674680Search in Google Scholar
Goodridge, W. S. (2016). Sensitivity analysis using Simple Additive Weighting method. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 8(5), 27–33.GoodridgeW. S.2016Sensitivity analysis using Simple Additive Weighting methodInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications852733Search in Google Scholar
Huang, Y.S., Chang, W.C., Li, W.H., Lin, Z.L. (2013). Aggregation of utility-based individual preferences for group decision-making. European Journal of Operational Research, 229(2), 462–469.HuangY.S.ChangW.C.LiW.H.LinZ.L.2013Aggregation of utility-based individual preferences for group decision-makingEuropean Journal of Operational Research.2292462469Search in Google Scholar
Hwang, C. L., Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making methods and application. Springer, United States.HwangC. L.YoonK.1981Multiple attribute decision making methods and applicationSpringerUnited StatesSearch in Google Scholar
Janssen, R. (1996). Multiobjective decision support for environmental management. Kulwer Academic Publishers, Holland.JanssenR.1996Multiobjective decision support for environmental managementKulwer Academic PublishersHollandSearch in Google Scholar
Kobryń, A. (2014). Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji w gospodarowaniu przestrzenią. Difin, Polska.KobryńA.2014Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji w gospodarowaniu przestrzeniąDifinPolskaSearch in Google Scholar
Koffka, K., Goodridge, W. (2015). Fault tolerant multi-criteria multi-path routing in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 7(6), 55–63.KoffkaK.GoodridgeW.2015Fault tolerant multi-criteria multi-path routing in wireless sensor networksInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications.765563Search in Google Scholar
Kumar, M., Jayaswal, P., Kushwah K. (2013). Exploring fuzzy SAW method for maintenance strategy selection problem of material handling equipment. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 3(2), 600–605.KumarM.JayaswalP.KushwahK.2013Exploring fuzzy SAW method for maintenance strategy selection problem of material handling equipmentInternational Journal of Current Engineering and Technology32600605Search in Google Scholar
Memariani, A., Amini, A., Alinezhad, A. (2009). Sensitivity analysis of simple additive weighting method (SAW): the results of change in the weight of one attribute on the final ranking of alternatives. Journal of Industrial Engineering, 4, 13–18.MemarianiA.AminiA.AlinezhadA.2009Sensitivity analysis of simple additive weighting method (SAW): the results of change in the weight of one attribute on the final ranking of alternativesJournal of Industrial Engineering41318Search in Google Scholar
Mokhtari, E., Khamehchian, M., Montazer, G., Nikudel, M. (2016). Landfill site selection using Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method and artificial neural network method; a case study from Lorestan province, Iran. International Journal of Geography and Geology, 5(10), 209–223.MokhtariE.KhamehchianM.MontazerG.NikudelM.2016Landfill site selection using Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method and artificial neural network method; a case study from Lorestan province, IranInternational Journal of Geography and Geology.510209223Search in Google Scholar
Putra, D. W. T., Punggara A. A. (2018). Comparison analysis of simple additive Weighting (SAW) and weigthed product (WP) in decision support systems. In: MATEC Web of Conferences. [on line] 215(1), 1003. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/705b/2d3c3ba9e882f113f53c83ec185f7aef6425.pdf?_ga=2.165226936.624443085.1618500084-257788093.1618500084 [Accessed 25 Jan. 2021].PutraD. W. T.PunggaraA. A.2018Comparison analysis of simple additive Weighting (SAW) and weigthed product (WP) in decision support systemsIn:MATEC Web of Conferences[on line]21511003Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/705b/2d3c3ba9e882f113f53c83ec185f7aef6425.pdf?_ga=2.165226936.624443085.1618500084-257788093.1618500084 [Accessed 25 Jan. 2021].Search in Google Scholar
Simanaviciene, R., Ustinovichius, L. (2010). Sensitivity analysis for multiple criteria decision making methods: TOPSIS and SAW. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(6), 7743–7744.SimanavicieneR.UstinovichiusL.2010Sensitivity analysis for multiple criteria decision making methods: TOPSIS and SAWSocial and Behavioral Sciences.2677437744Search in Google Scholar
Tahyudin, I., Rosyidi, R., Ahmar, A. S., Haviluddin, H. (2018). Comparison of the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) with the Technique for Others Reference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(2.2), 87–89.TahyudinI.RosyidiR.AhmarA. S.HaviluddinH.2018Comparison of the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) with the Technique for Others Reference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methodsInternational Journal of Engineering and Technology72.28789Search in Google Scholar
Trzaskalik, T. (2014). Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji. Przegląd metod i zastosowań. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, 74, 239–263.TrzaskalikT.2014Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji. Przegląd metod i zastosowańZeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej74239263Search in Google Scholar
Trzaskalik, T. (red.), (2014). Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji. Metody i zastosowania. Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Polska.TrzaskalikT.(red.),2014Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji. Metody i zastosowaniaPolskie Wydawnictwo EkonomicznePolskaSearch in Google Scholar
https://www.traseo.pl/mapy-turystyczne/mapa/74/gliwice-i-okolice-polska-galileoshttps://www.traseo.pl/mapy-turystyczne/mapa/74/gliwice-i-okolice-polska-galileosSearch in Google Scholar
Rozporządzenie Ministra Środowiska z dnia 11 grudnia 2020 r. w sprawie dokonywania oceny poziomów substancji w powietrzu (Dz.U. z 2020 r., poz. 2279).Rozporządzenie Ministra Środowiska z dnia 11 grudnia 2020 r. w sprawie dokonywania oceny poziomów substancji w powietrzu (Dz.U. z 2020 r., poz. 2279)Search in Google Scholar