Exploring a lay Gestalt of schizophrenia? A Danish background population’s explanations on why and how first-episode schizophrenia patients’ narratives were intuitively sensed as contextually inappropriate
20. Nov. 2017
Über diesen Artikel
Artikel-Kategorie: research-article
Online veröffentlicht: 20. Nov. 2017
Seitenbereich: 64 - 76
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/sjcapp-2017-008
Schlüsselwörter
© 2017 Charlotte Petersen et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Narration to Picture 1 and 24
Narrative F (Picture 1) | Narrative I (Picture 1) | Narrative J (Picture 1) | Narrative C (Picture 24) |
---|---|---|---|
and then…and then they take the frog home again… | |||
Are you (Danish: man) allowed to give the boy a name?…………. (…THE QUESTIONS CONTINUE…) |
Lay experts’ explanative trends; formal, affective and meaning aspects
FORMAL ASPECTS | |||
---|---|---|---|
Length | Fluency | Unfilled pauses | Filled pauses |
“short” (n=31) | “not fluent” (n=15) | “many/ | “uhm” (n=18) |
“not detailed” (n=13) | “not going as a story ought to” (n=1) | “long pauses” (n=22) | |
“enumeration” (n=5) | “notches” (n=4) | ||
“only one sentence at a time” (n=1) | “stops” (n=4) | ||
“keyword form” (n=1) | “dots” (n=1) | ||
“minimalistic” (n=1) |