Uneingeschränkter Zugang

The Role of Social Influence and Network Churn in Beliefs about Electronic Medical Record Technology


Zitieren

Figure 1:

Hypothesized model
Hypothesized model

Figure 2.

Illustrative example of network churn in an ego network
Illustrative example of network churn in an ego network

Figure 3.

Differences in beliefs about perceived usefulness from T1 to T2
Differences in beliefs about perceived usefulness from T1 to T2

Figure 4:

Moderating effect of network tie deletion on the relationship between changes in peer beliefs about usefulness and changes in ego’s beliefs about usefulness
Moderating effect of network tie deletion on the relationship between changes in peer beliefs about usefulness and changes in ego’s beliefs about usefulness

OLS regressions of individual’s perceived usefulness (change score) on covariates

Model 1Model 2Model 3
Intercept0.04 (0.65)0.09 (0.65)0.25 (0.64)
Change in Peer Perceived Usefulness0.30 (0.11)**0.33 (0.11)**0.35 (0.12)**
Change in Network Size0.01 (0.04)0.04 (0.04)0.03 (0.04)
Homophily (Yules Q) (change score)−0.18 (0.09)*−0.18 (0.09)*−0.18 (0.09)*
Gender0.01 (0.29)0.01 (0.29)−0.11 (0.29)
Age−0.02 (0.01)*−0.02 (0.01)*−0.02 (0.01)*
Nurse−0.41 (0.17)*−0.49 (0.18)**−0.48 (0.18)**
Clinical Unit (reference = Unit 6)
Unit 10.29 (0.26)0.35 (0.27)0.42 (0.25)
Unit 20.17 (0.28)0.22 (0.28)0.26 (0.26)
Unit 30.25 (0.31)0.27 (0.32)0.19 (0.30)
Unit 40.10 (0.26)0.12 (0.26)0.13 (0.27)
Unit 5−0.21 (0.31)−0.13 (0.31)0 (0.33)
Tie Additions−0.03 (0.07)
Tie Additions x Peer Perceived Usefulness0.09 (0.12)
Tie Deletions−0.03 (0.08)
Tie Deletions x Peer Perceived Usefulness−0.33 (0.12)**
Adjusted R20.070.070.12
N141137137

Correlation matrix

Variable Name12345678
1Change in Perceived Usefulness
2Change in Peer Perceived Usefulness0.23**
3Tie Additions0.02−0.07
4Tie Deletions−0.16*−0.14−0.02
5Change in Network Size0.130.020.80**0.59**
6Change in Homophily (Yules Q)−0.16−0.010.090.17*−0.06
7Gender (% Female)0.020.010.030.010.020.04
8Age−0.13−0.04−0.100.02−0.090.040.02
9Nurse (% Nurses)−0.13−0.120.09−0.010.08−0.12−0.14−0.18*

Descriptive statistics

Clinical Unit
Unit 1Unit 2Unit 3Unit 4Unit 5Unit 6Total
N242235601635192
Age34.2735.6244.0136.1433.8132.4736.48
Gender (% Female)95.83%86.36%91.43%85.00%100%97.14%91.15%
Nurse (% Nurses)62.50%77.27%91.43%78.33%56.25%65.71%74.48%
Tie Additions0.961.591.311.121.311.41.26
Tie Deletions1.671.681.40.951.881.111.31
Average Ego Network SizeT12.583.092.61.423.692.462.35
T21.8832.511.583.132.742.29
Ego Perceived UsefulnessT13.813.423.233.493.693.493.49
T23.292.762.292.582.633.062.73
Peer Perceived UsefulnessT13.73.423.293.33.753.53.45
T23.112.742.122.332.793.132.64
Homophily (Yules Q)T1−0.020.08−0.040.070.050.060.03
T2−0.050.030.1500.270.060.07
eISSN:
1529-1227
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
Volume Open
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Sozialwissenschaften, andere