Government programme | ICDDR,B programme | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cluster A | Cluster B | Cluster C | Cluster D | |
Observation | 83 | 106 | 145 | 96 |
Isolates | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
Number of components (>2 actors) | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
Mean no. of connections | 2.2 | 2.3 | 3.5 | 2.7 |
Proportion of actors with one connection* | 47.0% | 50.0% | 23.4% | 36.5% |
Density (std. dev.) | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
(0.4) | (0.3) | (0.3) | (0.3) | |
Total number of bi-components > 2 actors | 5 | 4 | 8 | 4 |
% of actors in bi-components of > 2 actors | 32.5% | 36.8% | 74.5% | 56.3% |
No. of nodes acting as cut points in bi-components of > 2 actors | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
No. of nodes acting as cut points | 29 | 32 | 28 | 25 |
Government programme | ICDDR,B programme | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cluster A | Cluster B | Cluster C | Cluster D | |
Degree centrality (std. dev.) | 2.2 (1.6) | 2.3 (1.7) | 3.5 (2.3) | 2.7 (1.8) |
Max. degree centrality score | 6 | 7 | 12 | 9 |
Group degree centrality | 4.7% | 4.6% | 3.0% | 6.8% |
Government programme | % of females | ICDDRB programme | % of females |
---|---|---|---|
Cluster A | 2.40% | Cluster C | 22.06% |
Cluster B | 20.80% | Cluster D | 5.20% |
Government programme | ICDDR,B programme | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cluster A | Cluster B | Cluster C | Cluster D | |
Pearson’s correlation between age and social connections | −0.13 |
−0.09 |
−0.08 |
−0.06 |
Pearson’s correlation between education and social connections | −0.04 |
−0.01 | −0.05 |
−0.06 |
Proportion of connections to non-relatives | 66% | 53% | 50% | 64% |
Proportion of connections outside the village | 29% | 41% | 32% | 33% |
Pearson’s correlation between a |
0.14 |
0.13 |
0.30 |
0.13 |